Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Halifax PPI and Package Account Fees reclaiming for dad **WON BOTH**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3370 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

give it a go

 

 

and post up the new spread

 

 

save yourself time having to explain things.

use the description labels correct ly

 

 

input first

 

 

the loan 1 PPI payments [name them 'Loan 1 PPI']

then list - Loan 1 PPI payments made through Loan 2

     

     

    then list Loan 2 PPI Payments [Loan 2 PPI]

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 204
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

nope you don't add the lump sum at all.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 126 refers to the PPI sums paid

 

 

 

 

where did 5.39 loan 1

and

10.74 30/4/2003 come from?

 

 

loan2 PPI was £9.95 not 9.14 or 9.10

or have I missed an interest rate change somewhere.??

 

 

and £18.75 1/6/9?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found statements for all of loan 2 so I just used the charge it said.

 

and the other charges are the one's i found for loan 1 and 2 in the "Halifax Insurance Paperwork"

 

should I change loan 2 PPI charge to 9.95 or use the ones the statement say?

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have written eveidence monthly of what was actually on the statements for ppi

yes you use those figures.

 

 

at the end of the day

 

 

although we find the spreadsheets are usually correct

they are in essence, guess work.

 

 

and should only be used as a guide.

 

 

lets them know , you know, what you are going on about,

 

 

they comply to the fos guideline calcs too.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay I use them,

 

Glad the spreadsheet is finished and I have updated my covering letter letting him know there under FOS rules.

 

 

Covering Letter:

 

Headquarters

Trinity Road

Halifax

West Yorkshire

HX1 2RG

 

 

Date: 09/01/2015

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Re: Account numbers: 0/0000000-0, 0/0000000-0

 

We am writing in relation to payment protection insurance (PPI) policies, associated with the above accounts, which we do not believe was sold to us correctly or fairly.

 

We believe you have not treated us fairly for the following reasons:

 

· The term of our PPI covers was shorter than the term of our loans and it wasn’t made clear to us that we wouldn’t be protected towards the end of the term

 

· The total cost of adding PPI to our loans was not clearly explained to us

 

· We felt that we was being pressured into taking the covers and unable to say no

 

· We was not told how to go about cancelling our polices

 

· We already had cover in place that could have protected our repayments but wasn’t asked about this, and we were told that we needed to take out PPI cover for our loans.

 

Unless you can provide proof that the polices were appropriate for our circumstances and that we was treated fairly when you sold us the insurances, we will expect a full refund of all premiums, the interest that we have incurred as a result of having the PPI covers and 8% simple interest until settled.

 

We have attached PPI questionnaires for both loans, evidence of PPI polices and a PPI redress calculation that’s under the Financial Ombudsman Service rules.

 

Under the FCA guidelines, Halifax has 8 weeks to resolve our complaint. We trust that you will deal with my case within this period. If not, we will refer the matter to the Financial Services Ombudsman.

We look forward to your prompt response to this letter.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Dad Signed

Mum Signed

 

Dad name printed

Mum name printed

 

Will this be okay?

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

were sold not was

 

 

wasnt made clear we would only be protected for XXtrs on an XXyrs loan

 

 

the overall cost , this being associated interest , was not explained, nor mentioned at all

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So I need to change:

 

We are writing in relation to payment protection insurance (PPI) policies, associated with the above accounts, which we do not believe was sold to us correctly or fairly.

 

To:

 

We are writing in relation to payment protection insurance (PPI) policies, associated with the above accounts, which we do not believe were sold to us correctly or fairly.

 

The term of our PPI covers was shorter than the term of our loans and it wasn’t made clear to us that we wouldn’t be protected towards the end of the term

 

To:

 

The term of our PPI covers were shorter than the term of our loans

and it wasn’t made clear we would only be protected for 5 years on an 9 year loan (Is this right? because the first loan was for 9years, but the second loan was from 2003 to 2009)

 

The total cost of adding PPI to our loans was not clearly explained to us

 

To:

 

The overall cost , this being associated interest, was not explained, nor mentioned at all

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

The term of our PPI covers were shorter than the term of our loans

and it wasn’t made clear we would only be protected for 5 years on an 9 year loan (Is this right? because the first loan was for 9years, but the second loan was from 2003 to 2009)

 

 

in each loan, the relevant PPI cover did not run for the full term, but the interest charged on the PPI premiums did.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right ok thanks for clearing that up for me,

 

I will leave it saying "The term of our PPIlink3.gif covers were shorter than the term of our loans

and it wasn’t made clear we would only be protected for 5 years on an 9 year loan"

 

I'll upload all of what I am going to put in my claim.

 

Covering letter

PPI questionnaires

All the ppi letters

Spreadsheet

 

Many Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I posted it today, got it tracked so I can keep an eye on it.

 

 

Good luck with that Andrew :)

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you :)

 

I'm not sure what the royal mail mean on there update. It says:

 

An attempt to deliver your item with 000000000000 was made on 10/01/15

but we were unable to deliver as there was no access to the delivery address.

 

 

The Item will be returned to HALIFAX to await instructions from the addressee or will be returned to sender.

 

 

You can arrange a redelivery online,

call the HALIFAX office to arrange a re-delivery,

or collect the item from HALIFAX by bringing proof of identification and address.

 

There are instructions on the card on how to collect your item or arrange a Redelivery.

 

 

Last update: 10 January 2015, 09:42am

 

Does that mean they will try again Monday?

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you :)

 

 

 

Does that mean they will try again Monday?

 

Thanks

Andrew

 

Sounds like you will need to get in touch with them and arrange a redelivery, either online or by phone.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

as a formal complaint 8 weeks

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply xd,

 

Won't they at least send a letter to say there looking into it or something before the 8 weeks? Also I put in the PPI Questionnaires that I was handling the case in the bit "If someone or claims handler is claiming for you" so will they address the letter to me or my mum and dad?

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

no idea wait and see

they typically ack the complaint yes

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay thank you dx I'll wait and see, just thinking since they didn't send the credit agreement for the 2009 Halifax loan in the SAR should I complain or will i not need it when claiming the PPI for the 2009 loan?

 

Thanks

 

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

might be an idea to see if they make ref to it first.

 

 

they are bound to make an offer tor replty

 

 

no harm in trying to get it mind yourself

simple phonecall referring to the sar and why it was not there?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

 

Got two letters from Halifax today, both the same and was saying were looking and getting information for the PPI claim. I'll upload the letter, I guess we just wait for an offer now then?

 

Thanks

Andrew

We live in a world where seeing is not believing, where only a few know what really happened.

NatWest Problem *****Refunded*****

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...