Jump to content


Claimform Carter/Lowell old welcome rewrite of a car finance 'debt' - already VT'd


BIGMAN2708
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3527 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Okay, now I have conflicting advice. One saying ignore the letter as it is their usual blurb sent out in these situations and secondly I should consider their settlement offer. But as stated they have not provided proof of the debt yet.

 

They have offered a settlement based on monthly payments but I could only afford monthly of around £40 based on my financial situation. So if I did make them an offer they could still decline my offer.

 

Going back to my defence/set off, can this still come into play or do you think they will go straight for a strike out if I fail to reply to their offer?

 

Or I they trying to call my bluff?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

ignore me andys the legal man.....

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As strong as your defence may be and may be successful.......you must also give consideration to all options...we are not telling you to proceed or to settle.

Offers of settlement can be viewed in different ways....they fear your defence...they cant be bothered to proceed or its not financially viable to proceed...or they cant disclose or prove their claim.

 

For whatever the reason they have decided to mediate...as I have stated the offer is negotiable...and using your defence/set off a deal could be struck...without proceeding without the risk of losing or attaining a CCJ...so with that in mind you could strike a deal of £10pm on an agreed figure considerably less than their claim....nothing is set in stone...and you don't need to respond by their time limit.That time limit is there to pressure you into an a decision before they decide to proceed to the next stage.

 

Whether that be an application to strike out or just to proceed to allocation...either option will cost them more expense...which reduces the profit in their purchase of your bad debt.

 

So just think about it.......

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

As strong as your defence may be and may be successful.......you must also give consideration to all options...we are not telling you to proceed or to settle.

Offers of settlement can be viewed in different ways....they fear your defence...they cant be bothered to proceed or its not financially viable to proceed...or they cant disclose or prove their claim.

 

For whatever the reason they have decided to mediate...as I have stated the offer is negotiable...and using your defence/set off a deal could be struck...without proceeding without the risk of losing or attaining a CCJ...so with that in mind you could strike a deal of £10pm on an agreed figure considerably less than their claim....nothing is set in stone...and you don't need to respond by their time limit.That time limit is there to pressure you into an a decision before they decide to proceed to the next stage.

 

Whether that be an application to strike out or just to proceed to allocation...either option will cost them more expense...which reduces the profit in their purchase of your bad debt.

 

So just think about it.......

 

Thanks Andy. Will look at it tomorrow with a clear head and post my thoughts tomorrow. Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy. Have been thinking over the situation this morning trying to decide my next move. Have taken your valuable advice on board. I think with my current financial situation and the effect long term this could have I feel it might be best to try and cut a deal. They may well not be able to prove their claim but I fear this is a bit of a gamble.

 

But I am still thinking about my defence/set off and wondering if I should not cut a deal and pursue the fact that the majority of the debt is made up of excessive fees/interest charges. Also, the fact that they have not provided the documents requested make me think that they will not be able to prove their claim.

 

Do I know wait for the DQ from the Court or do I respond to the Solicitors settlement letter? I assume the mediation would commence once I have completed the DQ form? Would this be the right time to then strike a deal?

 

Your advice would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Carter wants you to settle pre DQs (to save further expense) but in reality mediation should follow DQs and run independently to the claim process.

So considering he's so keen there is no harm trying to deal pre DQ.

 

The supplying of documents is irrelevant...they will only disclose at the relevant stage in proceedings (just before trial).With regards to excessive fees/interest charges please bear in mind that some DJ if not most might not agree and are part of the T&Cs that you agreed to...so nothing is a done deal.

 

If you wish to start now you must start low...considering the amounts involved.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I see what you mean. What do you reckon would be a reasonable but low offer, as you say it is a large sum. Realistically I can only afford around £30 a month. Was thinking of offering 25% of the debt which is approx £1600. In your opinion is this reasonable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What of the claim do you think you are legally indebted to....work a figure out and base your offer on that.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I will go through the statements tonight and work a figure out. The settlement letter they sent me included a form which would be sent to the court for them to “Stay” the Judgement based on my offer. Should I complete this or just put the offer in writing for now until they agree?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A consent cant be finalised until you negotiate the terms of the settlement...which then becomes the Consent Order which stays the claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...