Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lloyds loan ppi,decision, bank.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3626 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

[ATTACH]52103[/ATTACH]Hello Everyone, I received a letter, back in April 14, telling me I may have been mis-sold a PPI product on my Lloyds Loan, Seeing as they had wrote to me, when I hadn't put a complaint in. I thought I'd fill in the questionaire, and see what happens.

 

This loan was taken out Dec 2005 for 3500 over 60mths, anyway in 2007 my partner was diagnosed with cancer of the lymph nodes. so we made a claim on the policy. which did pay the loan off , eventually!.

 

I really didn't expect to get very far with the complaint, and have received there decision today, and to be honest I do not understand it one bit, and was hoping that someone could glance over the documents, to see if it adds up? as I wouldn't trust them as far as i could throw them. I've attached a number of docs, agreement, statements etc. I just want to make sure that they are not thinking they can get one over on me, by sending me a letter that does nothing but confuse me, and that i will do nothing more.

If its correct then fine I just wanted to make sure.

 

any way I look forward to any replies, and thank you in advance, for your time to look and the letters.

 

 

Pauline (pac man)

 

Hope Ive uploaded docs right !

Edited by pac man
remove details
Link to post
Share on other sites

They are saying that the amount paid out under the policy exceeds and redress you are due and therefore there is nothing further for them to pay.

 

The redress would be £1600 odd an the amount paid out by them under a claim is £4400 odd so you have had far more out than you paid in.

 

You can check whether the redress part is right by referring to No.1 in my signature and using the spreadsheets but it will only be worth pushing this if the redress figure exceeds the amount they have paid out.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if the files are a bit out of order and yes I understand partly what they are saying. But do the calculations add Up? how they have worked it out is that the correct way ?

 

that is what I'm asking

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

But do the calculations add Up? how they have worked it out is that the correct way ?

 

that is what I'm asking

 

Thanks

 

Impossible to say whether the figures are correct. You would need to let us have the figures from the loan agreements and all of the repayments made in order to be able to work it out.

 

Simply put, they would work out what redress you would be due with the successful claim. They then look at what was paid out under the policy.

 

If what they paid out in claims exceeds what you paid them then there is no money to come back to you.

 

As I say, without the base data we cannot work out whether the values they have arrived are correct.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, first repayment 16 jan 2006.

made 17 payments - after putting in claim, and waiting for a decision, they told me if my claim approved they would back date it to the date i first notified them - this was the beginning of june 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know im probably confusing matters but i paid 17 payments - for the 18th payment I missed the Direct Debit , but when the insurance paid out it should of been back dated and cover that

so where its says the 19th july 2007 - £3507.05 from insurance, I also had a letter to comfirm the loan was settled . but after some time i was notified that it was not settled because of the missed direct debit, and then see statements 3&4 it shows as being paid 17th Feb 2010 , after i got late charges and tring to take the june 2007 payment with out notifying me and sometime later aswell - 2010

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so your PPI repayments were £22.36 per month.

 

Use this spreadsheet and enter each payment of £22.36 you actually made.

 

Set the " claim to" date to today.

 

When done, let us know what figures the spreadsheet comes up with.

 

[ATTACH]52140[/ATTACH]

 

Hi & thank you, have done the sheet with last payment in may 2007 and the figure is 618.95? but if you look at my statements they took more money from me in 2010 and only

credited the lump sum then so should i include the 2010 payments also?.

 

thanks & got to go to work now so, will have to come back later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so still under what Lloyds said you paid.

 

They are coming out at £1100 odd.

 

But since you have had £4000 odd in money paid out on the policy, on a premium of £928 at the outset, what you paid out is never going to exceed £4000.

 

Accordingly there will be no repayment due to you.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for checking that, its greatly appreciated, just wondered why on appendix a it says i made 50 payments of PPI, when I only made 15 thus making the "how much i paid in monthly repayments wrong and price of ppi at the beginning ( 928.02) as this cost 413.58 for the finance of arranging the PPI

 

I thought they might of been trying to pull the wool over my eyes in some way with there calculations - would 'nt of put it past them. ( I'm Just a suspicious person :)

 

Anyway thanks again for your time,and checking it for me .

 

pacman.

Edited by pac man
adding
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...