Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CSA mess up, who can help?


skookum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3592 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Basically I had a period of unemployment and started work 18th May (Sunday).

 

I called the CSA on Monday 19th and informed them of a change in circumstance. At the time I was on a zero hours contract so didn't have guaranteed hours. I soon got 40 hours per week and informed them all the way of the changes.

 

I calculated an average over a month of 15% of my salary and paid every week from my first pay packet.

 

Basically they sent me a letter saying I was in arrears as I had not paid for the weeks commencing the 7th May. I explained to them I didn't start work until the 19th but wouldn't have any of it. They even said they had reason to believe I had worked cash in hand as my bank statements didn't back up their claims.

 

I thought this would be easy to sort out so I called the DWP who confirmed my claim didn't stop till the Friday 16th. I asked for a letter to confirm this and then made the School boy error of saying why I needed it.

 

Immediately I was put on hold and the lady returned to me saying she couldn't confirm when my claim stopped. I was baffled as she had just read it all out to me. It seems my entire file was lost as they no longer had my address, bank details or contact numbers.

 

I was left with being told they would investigate why they could not get my information up. A letter will be sent confirming when my claim stopped but they could not tell me over the phone when that was.

 

I feel I am being really stitched up. The CSA take nothing I say or the evidence I give. They just take my ex's verbal claims as gospel. The CSA even want £37 out of a pay packet of £42 I got for an afternoons trial.

 

Is there anyone I can take this too?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that is there get out. Because my bank statements back up my version which I was broke and only receiving JSA. They causally turned round and said 'it isn't showing in your bank because you probably got paid cash in hand'.

 

I am at my wits end. I am not being tight I don't get much more than minimum wage. I am struggling to make ends meet as it is and they are demanding this payment which I simply cannot pay and don't even owe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When my daughter argued her ex worked cash in hand the CSA told her she'd have to provide concrete evidence.

 

Ask them what actual evidence they have and put in a complaint (they should have a complaints procedure).

 

Even if you provided DWP evidence, they'd still try to argue cash in hand without evidence. This is clearly unfair.

 

As for the DWP, you usually send letters with regards when claim has stopped. Doubt this is a conspiracy, just incompetence. Write a letter of complaint to them also.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Possibly worth contacting your MP on this. The CSA can't legally assume that you worked cash in hand simply because your doing so wouldn't actually violate the laws of physics. If they want to suggest that you have undocumented income (and to base their assessment of your liability on this supposed fact) then they can't just say "well, it's possible." They need to have some evidence.

 

As to the DWP not confirming when your claim stopped, goodatresearch is probably correct: it's not likely a conspiracy. However, don't take no for an answer, as it's really not that difficult for a benefit processor to write such a letter. I used to write them all the time.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had a further conversation with them.

 

They have concluded their investigation and find I owe arrears of £181.

 

They have broken them down as £50 for the alleged cash in hand work I never did. £30 for the short full in payments from 14/04 to date as the original assessment was wrong.

 

The final one is a short full in payments whilst I spent 20 weeks on JSA. During those 20 weeks I had the money taken straight from my benefit which a call just now with the DWP has confirmed was done.

 

I phoned them back and said I understand the short full from the 14/04 but the rest is nonsense.

 

I have been given till the end of the month to pay this amount before legal proceedings will be considered and maybe a deduction of earnings.

 

I have no idea what to do now and i don't have the money. The council left me in over a £1000 of rent and council tax arrears which still are not sorted.

 

Going back to work has roughly left me in £1400 of debt (rent, council tax, DWP Loan, CSA). Even though I paid eveyt hing in full from the first weeks pay check up till this date.

 

My landlord and Council are demanding so much a week to cover these arrears I am now working for after travel costs -£15 a week which my retired parents are supporting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely your entitled to a copy of the evidence of the cash in hand? Wouldnt they need proper evidence if they take legal action? Have you talked to your ex about this, are they just taking her word for this or is she stating its hasn't come from her?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely your entitled to a copy of the evidence of the cash in hand? Wouldnt they need proper evidence if they take legal action? Have you talked to your ex about this, are they just taking her word for this or is she stating its hasn't come from her?

 

She is a very bitter person even though we split up 6 years ago. She is very close to my mother and told her some cock and bull story she thought I was paying too much.

 

The reality is she wants more, a lot more. My retired parents look after our child every other weekend and all the school holidays for nothing. I pay them what I can when i can but I even end up taking from them.

 

I just phoned the CSA and offered them top whack what I can pay week, about £10 more than my regular weekly payment. They have rejected it and will write to me in due course.

 

In all honesty it is making me ill now. I work nights and now spend the whole day I should be sleeping trying to sort out all these problems. I am back on meds again from my GP and fear I am going to relapse into depression and anxiety that cost me my last job.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you told CSA about the fact that your mum has your child every other weekend and hols? This should reduce the amount you have to pay as this reduces her costs and your paying your mum anyway?

 

I know this is making you ill but I'd be tempted to tell them to take me to court as their claim cannot be substantiated. They cannot just rely on your exs allegations, they wouldnt with my daughter and insisted on actual evidence.

 

Put all this in writing as a complaint so you have a paper trail and ask them to disclose the source of their evidence. I can't see how they can win this without evidence, otherwise all exs would get away with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

if the QC stays with the non-resident parents mother (or any other address apart from the NRPs address) then shared care is NOT applicable

If they say you were working cash in hand ask then what they have based the £50.00 per week assessment on (if its a DMD that depends on the number of QC's (£30 for 1 £40 for 2 or £50 for 3 or more)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...