Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Co-Op Gold Card and PPI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3741 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear CAG members

 

Hopefully this is posted in the right area - apologies if not!

 

I recently lost my pip case against the CO-OP for my old gold card - oh and I had to write to them as they didn't den contact me wrt the PPI on my gold card! reasons given below:-

 

My complaint was around

 

1) At no point in the raising of the account did the Co_op salesman state that it was optional,

 

2) I was self employed - no safety net on payments

 

3) I did not fee it was adequately explained

 

4) It would not cover me at all

 

Response from Co-Op (paraphrasing)

 

No failings in the sale of the PPI

 

when completing the appln form I ticked the box saying I wanted PPI and signed - as I signed it I was aware that PPI was optional,

 

Based on the fact I was self-employed and if I became ill or sick it may have been financially difficult for me to maintain card payments. However, in the event of a successful claim the policy would have paid 5% of the monthly outstanding balance for unto 24 months and 18 months in the case of redundancy.

 

You stated that your wife would have covered payments if you had been unable to work (not sure he understood what I meant here) .

 

The policy document that was issued .... accurately describes the features, exclusions and limitations of the PPI policy. The Policy document would have confirmed that despite being self empaled you were still able to make a claim against the policy subject to meeting the criteria.

 

So in essence the policy was appropriate for my circumstances!!

 

What a disappointment!!

 

Any ideas anyone?

 

 

Kind Regards

 

 

 

Alan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again

 

Having re-read through the policy - it does not pay out if you have a pre-existing medical condition - such as asthma - so back to the Co-Op to try again?

 

Any advice from anyone gratefully received.

 

 

 

Alan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was their letter marked "Final Decision"?

 

If so you are free to pass this to fos and open a complaint with them.

 

Did you tell the Co-Op that you had a pre-existing medical condition?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although you could try an carry on dialogue with them I am not sure you will get anywhere.

 

You can now lodge your complaint with fos, giving them all of the details as to what has happened thus far and they will investigate for you.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks for that - I will start the case with the FOS but the stupid thing was I was phoned out of the blue by the Co-Op and asked to remember things from 1998? I'll keep you posted.

 

 

Regards

 

 

 

Alan

Link to post
Share on other sites

what was the criteria for meeting a s/e unemployment claim?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

Any help I am able to give is from my own experience only. Should you have any doubt you should contact a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...