Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Citi Financial giving me runaround


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3808 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone it is my first time posting so I hope I am on the right forum.

 

We have been paying a secured loan with Citi for years (2006).

 

In 2009 it went to a suspended repossession order and since then we have never missed a payment even though it has been a struggle.

 

A few weeks ago I received a handful of annual statements from them

but did not really know why they had sent me them all in one go.

 

On Saturday 4th January,

 

we received the following letter:

 

Account number is ****************

 

Further to our recent correspondence regarding annual statements

we would like to advise you that due to our failure to supply these statements in accordance with the Consumer Credit Act 1974

we have refunded all interest and fees accrued during the period of non-compliance 01/10/2009 until 30/09/2013.

 

The breakdown of sums refunded to your account is as follows:

 

Interest £7880.20

Fees £981.13

 

The current balance of your account after the refund is £211.27.

 

Citi had a phone number that you could contact if you had any questions,

my husband rang them but they have refused to deal with us,

and have told us that we must deal with their solicitors (Wallers, very rude people) as that is where our account is,

 

he rang them and we were told that the 211.27 is not our final amount

and we have to request a redemption figure and it will take 7-10 days,

they won't tell us how much it is, and

 

I am very concerned that it is going to be an amount that we cannot pay in one go

and we end up back in court after all this time.

 

We rang Citi again but they will not say anything but wait for the redemption figure.

 

Maybe I was naive to think that if we paid the 211.27 that was it, as that is all the letter says.

Any advice would be appreciated.

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

they shouldn't be charging any PENALTY or arrears fees anyway, they are unlawful!!

 

so have you aLL the statements from birth?

 

and the agreement?

 

did you attend court

on the CCJ

and the CO?

 

did you KNOW they were doing these?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do have a copy of the agreement somewhere,

 

and the only other things we received from them was the letters charging us 10 pounds every month for arrears.

 

My husband attended the hearing for the suspended repossession order,

 

there was no other hearing apart from that.

 

We did involve the FSA at one point regarding the fees and they said that Citi would pay back the fees

but when contacted said they would take them off the account at the end of the loan.

 

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry it is my first time and my last post disappeared.

 

The only thing we received of Citi is the letters each month telling us they were charging us 10 pounds for being in arrears.

 

We did involve the FSA but they seemed powerless and said upon speaking to Citi that they would refund all the charges at the end of the loan.

 

I do have a copy of the agreement somewhere,

 

and my husband did attend the hearing regarding the suspended repossession order but that was the only hearing there ever was.

Link to post
Share on other sites

when was the spo hearing?

 

did they not get a CCJ first on you?

 

as for the penalty charges you can get them ALL back at their int rates

 

seems like they owe you.

 

send citi an sar

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok well legal is not my strong point

 

so p'haps they didn't need to.

 

get that sar off

 

lets get all the data first.

 

I suspect they didn't refund [the charges before 2009?

will wipe the £211 out now?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes £10 PO

 

no need for a covering letter

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...