Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Who can change late default date on HFC Marbles Card if debt is now with Lowell Portfolio I


molly2
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3821 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a credit card with Marbles several years ago.

 

I entered a DMP and have been paying substantially reduced payments ever since.

 

After 3.5 years of phone calls from them they gave up, defaulted the debt and sold on to a DCA.

 

I believe I may have a right to get the default date moved back by 3 years to within 6 months of stopping contractual payments and then it will drop off my credit file 3 years sooner.

 

Who do I write to to ask for my default date to be changed?

 

I can't see the DCA being interested nor Marbles.

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

formal complaint to marbles first

 

then the ico if no joy

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They defaulted 3.5 years after the actual point of default?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx,

 

i take it that marbles' data controller is able to alter the default date on a debt now registered with a DCA,

either directly or by asking the DCA to alter it then ?

 

ren, yes Marbles default date is 3.5 years after I stopped contractual credit card payments.

 

They added over 20% of interest in those 3.5 years to boot!

Link to post
Share on other sites

the default would/should have been placed before the sale.

 

as for the intrest after sale

 

if its not in the ORIGINAL T&C'S they cant add anything.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry yes it was marbles who added interest for 3.5 years and then added the default marker. The DCA has not added any interest or charges as yet.

 

my question was: if i write to marbles to ask them to alter the default date of the debt which now belongs to the DCA, can they legally do this?

 

marbles marked their own debt as satisfied when they sold it to the DCA so no longer control anything on my credit file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the oc put the default on the oc are responsible for correct reporting

it being that by ICO guidelines, the default should have been placed within 3-6mts of the cause of action

[the third missed payment]

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

The DCA is updating the debt on credit file monthly. Marbles have removed their entry from the credit file entirely now (Noddle and Equifax checked).

 

The letter of assignment from OC to DCA said :

 

We are writing to notify you that: Progressive Credit Limited has assigned all of its respective rights, title and interest in respect of the above referenced account (including the outstanding balance) to DCA Portfolio Ltd, effective 01/04/2012

...

Under the terms of the above assignments, and as defined in the Data Protection Act 1998, DCA Portfolio Ltd is now the Data Controller of your Personal Data contained in the records of this account. DCA Financial Ltd has been appointed by DCA Portfolio Ltd to manage your account and it is essential that all future payments and correspondence regarding this account be directed to DCA Financial Ltd at: [DCA address]

 

Should I write to the O,C asking them to inform DCA Portfolio Ltd of the correct default date, as suggested by dx100 ?

 

Or does the above imply that the DCA is the one I should be writing to (presumably with evidence of payment made from 2008 to 2012 before the debt was assigned to the DCA so the DCA can see I'm not telling porkies about when the cause of default action took place)?

Edited by molly2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading back on this payments never actually ceased? You made reduced payments for a period the account was then defaulted and sold on?

The letter means the DCA is the data controller for the account from the date it was acquired.

 

Any data prior to that is still in the domain of the original creditor.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The contractual minimum was around £300 per month.

I made payments of £15 per month for a couple of years and now I'm currently making payments of £1 per month.

The account was defaulted in March 2012 when the payments reduced to £1.

It was sold to DCA in August 2012.

 

I've drafted a letter to Marbles to ask them to change their default date to 2009 and inform DCA Portfolio Ltd of the new default date. Shall I send it to Marbles ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exactly which DCA is this please?

 

Two Major DCAs use 'portfolio ' in their trading style Lowell and Hoist?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

molly if we have accurate data to work with it is easier to give accurate advice, the approach may be different dependent on this.

I will get back to you.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd be getting an sar off to HFC too

they'll be PPI & PENALTY charges to reclaim I bet

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok. Can you backtrack right to the start please.

 

Give us a concise breakdown of the dates where each thing happened.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

May 2008 Marbles credit card balance 10k

 

June 2008 Missed first contractual payment of 300 (paid nothing)

 

August 2008 Started DMP, paid 15 per month to Marbles who initially freeze interest but over the years add 3k of interest and a few late payment charges

 

September 2008 AP marker applied at CRAs by Marbles

 

January 2012 DMP payments to Marbles reduced to 1 per month

 

April 2012 Marbles issue default dated April 2012

 

August 2012 Marbles sell 13k debt to Lowell Portfolio I and remove their own entry from at least 2 CRAs

 

September 2012 Lowell add a CRA entry with default date April 2012

Edited by molly2
Link to post
Share on other sites

According to guidance note 9 ICO the default occurred as soon as you failed to meet your contractual obligations. “A default is said to occur as soon as a borrower fails to meet the terms of their credit agreement”

 

Some further breaches of the guidelines;

 

“Accounts should not be routinely filed as being in default where full payments or those due under a rescheduled agreement are fewer than three consecutive months in arrears.”

 

“Accounts should normally be filed as being in default where those payments due have not been received for six months.”

 

"This guidance does not relate to lenders’ internal policies regarding collection activities or decisions to write off debts, and so on. It is concerned solely with the filing of information for credit referencing purposes. Such internal policies and practices should not be the determining factor in when and how a default is filed.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding what constitutes a default and the breakdown of relationship I refer to guideline 10 which gives the following as an indication of when a breakdown has occurred in the relationship between the lender and the individual.

 

“The account has been referred to a collection agency or in-house debt collection department.”

 

“The lender takes or has taken steps to cut off the service provided” - I assume you stopped using the card.

 

“The customer has not made satisfactory proposals in response to a demand for repayment” - £15 is understandably not a satisfactory proposal as it would take hundreds of years to clear the balance.

 

“The customer has given clear indication that they do not intend to meet their contractual obligations.”

Link to post
Share on other sites

It can also be argued that £15 is a token payment hence guadance note 17.

“Lenders should not file a default where there is a genuine and agreed variation in the payment schedule. (The only exception to this is where a debt management programme is put in place where the level of repayment represents only a token sum which is only accepted by the lender because the customer cannot afford to pay more.”

 

and finally your efforts to pay have left you in a far worse position than someone who made no effort at all as they would have had a default registered far earlier.

“Where a rescheduling of this type breaks down, a default may be filed when the total value of the arrears is equivalent to three monthly payments under the original terms. However, this should not result in the customer being placed in a worse position than someone who has made no effort to pay whatsoever. “

 

Much ammunition to suggest the default should have been registered many many months earlier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...