Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

SGE loans debited money without permission


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3868 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I've had a major problem with this company

 

I applied for a loan online to which I received a call from them,

 

the guy was talking so fast I could barely understand what he was talking about offering me mobile phones contracts

 

I told him I didn't know what he was talking about & I wasn't interested in anything other than a loan..

 

he had already asked for my bank details which I reluctantly gave him after he advised me nothing would be debited out of my account.

 

We went through the loan part & turned out I didn't get one..

 

that was that or I thought

 

a week later £89.99 was taken out of my bank..

 

I was completly gutted as this was all I had with 2 young children to provide for!

 

I rang the company who was very rude & refused to give me my money back as I had paid & agreed for 'premium service'

 

i asked to speak to a manager to which he wouldn't do at 1st

 

I carried on at him and he said I'll av a long wait and stuck me on hold...

 

Credit ran out so am now dealing with them via email &

they are not helping me atall.

 

They are now saying they will listen to the call recording within 28days.

 

I've been completly left with no money

& this is all just really upsetting

 

any advise would be greatly received x

Link to post
Share on other sites

loads of people getting spoofed by various companies brokering a loan .

 

go get the moneyback via chargeback on your banks phone number

 

DONT get off the phone till it happens

 

http://whatconsumer.co.uk/visa-debit-chargeback/#axzz2j7cNJGGJ

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have spoken to my bank several times

they 1st off said once it shows on my statement I can dispute it

but when I called back once it was showing

they said as it was a broker they couldn't do anything

and would have to take it up with the company directly :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

The consumer credit act and the Office of Fair Trading both make clear that the maximum that can be charged for a broker's fee is £5 - if a loan cannot be sourced within 6 months. As such you have two options.

 

a) Request a refund less the £5 that they are allowed; or

b) Request a full refund on the grounds of misrepresentation of the broker.

 

Regardless of the route you attempt you MUST complain about them to the OFT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have spoken to my bank several times

they 1st off said once it shows on my statement I can dispute it

but when I called back once it was showing

they said as it was a broker they couldn't do anything

and would have to take it up with the company directly :(

 

WRONG.

 

who's the bank

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with barclays the 1st guy I spoke to was ok he said ring back as soon as it shows on the statement which I did to then be told there is nothing they can do, I am fuming at the way the sge loans have treated me I can't understand how they can do this to people, I'm just worried I'll never get my money bak :( x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there.

 

The consumer credit act and the Office of Fair Trading both make clear that the maximum that can be charged for a broker's fee is £5 - if a loan cannot be sourced within 6 months. As such you have two options.

 

a) Request a refund less the £5 that they are allowed; or

b) Request a full refund on the grounds of misrepresentation of the broker.

 

Regardless of the route you attempt you MUST complain about them to the OFT.

 

Sorry what is OFT I really have no idea on anything regarding his I have never been in any kind of situation I wouldn't normally be so stupid to give my details out, lesson learnt tho! :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays are wrong.

 

you must get on the phone and demand a chargeback and keep going up the chain till you get it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

seriously don't give up

 

keep going up the chain till you get it.

 

IF par chance

and I doubt they will

start going on about a thing called CPA

 

then this is very useful.

 

Regulator orders Banks and mutuals to review complaints about not cancelling recurring payments from November 2009.

Consumers who have set up a regular payment from their account will now be able to successfully cancel that arrangement

by contacting their card provider, the Financial Conduct Authority said.

The FCA has been examining how easy it is for customers to cancel Continuous Payment Authorities (CPAs)

due either to payday lendersicon or for other regular payments such as subscriptions or gymicon memberships.

 

CPAs, which are also commonly called recurring transactions or recurring payments,

are relatively easy to set up but can be hard to cancel, causing problems for consumers trying to manage their finances,the FCA said.

 

Now, following the FCA review of how the largest high street banks and mutuals process requests to cancel CPAs, they have agreed that they will ensure that when a customer asks for a recurring payment to end, that will be sufficient to cancel the arrangement. They have also confirmed that should a payment go through by mistake following cancellation by a customer the customer will be refunded immediately.

 

In addition to securing this commitment, the largest banks and mutuals have agreed to review every individual complaint they have received about the non-cancellation of a CPA and to pay redress where payments have continued to be made despite the customer cancelling the arrangement. This applies to all complaints since November 2009 when the Financial Services Authority, the FCA’s predecessor, began regulating banking conduct.

 

Clive Adamson, the FCA’s director of supervision, said: “It’s important that consumers are confident that banks are meeting their everyday banking needs. Today customers can be confident that when they ask for a Continuous Payment Authority to be cancelled – it will be cancelled - and that it can be done easily.

 

“We recognise that historically this is an area where some customers have struggled but the banks and mutuals have responded positively to our work on this issue. From now on we expect them to be getting this right. In addition, they have committed to review past complaints.”

 

http://www.ftadviser.com/2013/06/28/regulation/regulators/fca-banks-have-to-cancel-recurring-payments-if-requested-UxbeHUuYQIy0SEYbGRE4tJ/article.html

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...