Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Barclays requesting information on PPI Claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3888 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

I am new to this forum and would really like some advice /guidance, please.

 

I have recently submitted a PPI claim to Barclays and they responded with the normal letter, saying they were looking into it. Then Yesterday I received another letter from the requesting more information:

 

1. Please provide documentary evidence of your employment at the time of sale. Accetable documentary evidence would be a copy of a letter from the Dept of work and pensions if you were unemployed or a copy of your accounts if you were self-employed.

 

I was employed with one company for the time of all the loans mentioned - so how do I respond to this question. As I was neither unemployed or self-employed.

 

2. Please provide any further details to support your complaint that the policy was unsuitable for your needs because you were part of your employer's sick pay scheme at the time of sale. In particular you may want to detail your employer name., the level of cover and length of cover provided

 

I can provide the name of my employer and could potentially call them for their sickness terms - would this suffice?

 

3. Please provide additonal details relating to how the policy was sold to you (May 2001 sale only). You may want to detail where the sale took place, who you may have spoken to, what information you were given, or any other information you can recall.

 

I cannot remember who I spoke to, where the sale took place (although I believe this one was a top up to an existing loan) - How to answer?

 

You may wish to include any additional information that you able to provide to assist us in fully and fairly assessing your complaint as quickly as possible.

All needs to be back to them in 10 days time!?!

 

Any advice/help/guidance, please?

I can see from going through the forum there is lots of help, so feeling pretty hopeful.

Sorry, if this has been asked before, but I didn't come across any replies in my search.

 

P.S. I am also going to send them the SAR letter - should I send this with my replies or separately?

:???::???::???::???::???::???:

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your Subject Access Request should be separate to the PPI claim.

 

I will ask one of the PPI people to look in on you regarding your other questions.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thinking about this more rationally now,

 

perhaps replying with my employers details for the time of the loans and then saying:

 

to enable me to answer the other questions asked I require them to send me the SAR information.

 

...I have banked with them my entire life (including my business accounts, & numerous savings accounts too), so I am sure there will be a lot of information to send :|

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be reluctant to send specific details yet

 

get that sar done

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My business account is new, in the last year......but still they can see from their records for the loan periods, I was receiving monthly payments from my employer, into my bank account.:|

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...