Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

ISME Shop Direct PPI - **£3K WON AFTER 18mts**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3348 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My friend has had a catalogue with account cover plus on (PPI) for over 20years.

She has been in financial difficulty for three years and cant afford her catalogue payments.

 

It was only when I got involved that I found out about PPI.

She says she didn't want the cover but was pressured into taking it.

 

She was either unemployed or on part time work at the time.

 

I suppose that's how club books make their money from people who cant afford to pay outright.

 

Having used the compound interest calculator using just £1 @ 44.8% it comes out today at £ 4,412.89

 

Now she has been paying them for 22years so this is going to be a huge claim?

 

That makes me think it will be strongly contested.

 

your thoughts please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

aha sounds like kays lifestyle account

doing the same for a neighbour

 

her claim is almost £5k

 

since 1989!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

yes

 

is the date also exactly 6yrs from the date of your request par chance?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's probably due to the fact that they don't hold records any further back than that.

 

Don't like to play the killjoy but I wouldn't get her hopes up. A catalogue company wouldn't have been regulated at the time hence no access to FOS. It's probably going to be difficult to prove her employment status from 25 years ago as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

done twice now.

 

cant of been isme either

 

were not around 20yrs ago

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's probably due to the fact that they don't hold records any further back than that.

 

Don't like to play the killjoy but I wouldn't get her hopes up. A catalogue company wouldn't have been regulated at the time hence no access to FOS. It's probably going to be difficult to prove her employment status from 25 years ago as well.

 

You arent seriously suggesting they hold exactly 6 years data and no more?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

 

is the date also exactly 6yrs from the date of your request par chance?

 

dx

 

Yes exactly to the date of receiving the SAR request.

 

What i have received is coded and as complicated as they could make it

 

What statements they have provided the print is so small micro film is bigger ..lol.

 

When you phone them before you speak to anyone you get a message informing you ALL calls are recorded...

 

.SO where are the copies of the voice comms or transcripts? No copy of original agreement.

 

Yet when I spoke with their PPI insurance team a month ago he could see the date the account was opened,

the date the PPI commenced, the amount of the first payment and the rate of interest?

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have got the info yes

 

sar is not limited to 6yrs

 

you should write back stating you consider the sar incomplete

you want ALL the data they hold, not JUST to the 6yrs barrier

 

whatever act or prevention of fraud stuff they are invoking is not an excuse for not supplying it

under an sar

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's probably going to be difficult to prove her employment status from 25 years ago as well...................If they have no records its going to be more difficult for them to dispute too...works both ways!

Edited by hsbcfiddled
add text
Link to post
Share on other sites

exactly!!

 

its funny what info they came up with on one I did.

 

they stated they had evidence this person was in full time employment

so was not an unemployed single mum at the time.

 

funny how the first orders were all baby stuff!!

 

and the baby was born 3 weeks before

 

they coughed nicely

 

don't trust anything they say.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

exactly!!

 

its funny what info they came up with on one I did.

 

they stated they had evidence this person was in full time employment

so was not an unemployed single mum at the time.

 

funny how the first orders were all baby stuff!!

 

and the baby was born 3 weeks before

 

they coughed nicely

 

don't trust anything they say.

 

dx

 

So did you get the full details including original agreement dx?

Link to post
Share on other sites

rarely do you get an agreement

they don't have any

 

you first order serves as your agreement to the agreement!

they used to send them out

2 in a tear-off page

you signed both

kept one

sent the other back

 

most people didn't bother

 

PENALTY fees are sadly only reclaimable outside of 6yrs

throught the courts

or

if you can prove that had the PPI not been there that month

the penalty would not have been necessary.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that cut -off date is TOO near to exactly 6yrs from your request

 

you need to write back

and demand statements from BEFORE 6yrs

they obv have them.

 

the SAR is NOT limited to ONLY 6yrs

 

it is ALL data they hold on your on whatever system & at what ever age.

 

there is no 'get-out' for them under the fraud act to not supply the data if they have it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that cut -off date is TOO near to exactly 6yrs from your request

 

you need to write back

and demand statements from BEFORE 6yrs

they obv have them.

 

the SAR is NOT limited to ONLY 6yrs

 

it is ALL data they hold on your on whatever system & at what ever age.

 

there is no 'get-out' for them under the fraud act to not supply the data if they have it.

 

dx

 

I have already drawn up a letter in the strongest terms informing that them that I believe this was a deliberate tactic and they have not complied with the SAR and that if they do not comply within the 40 day time limit I will inform the ICO. I asked for Data Proctection Officers name and evidence of any destruction. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

good move

 

cant harm anything.

 

you might find it useful to read the shelley Barclaycard thread

in the Barclaycard successes forum on this

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

scan up the letter please

 

never give up on the first fob off letter.

 

set your default scan page size to A4 less than 300DPI [150 will do]

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture[jpg] file

don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

'

BUT......

ENSURE: remove all pers info inc. barcodes etc

but leave all monetary figures and dates.

.

************************* ************************* *******

{DO NOT USE A BIRO OR PEN OR USE SEE THRU TAPE OR LABELS]

************************* ************************* ***********

.

DO IT IN MSPAINT.EXE or any photo editing program

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites ...

http://freejpgtopdf.com/

..

if you have multiple scans/pics

put them in a word doc FIRST and convert that to PDF

or http://www.freepdfconvert.com/

or

use www.pdfmerge.com

 

convert existing PC files to PDF [office has an installable print to PDF option]

..

it would be better to upload a multipage pdf if

you have many images too rather than many single pdfs

.

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

try and logically name your file so people know what it is.

though dont use full bank names or CAG in the title

i'e Default notice DD-mm-yyyy TSB

.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

follow the guide please

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

First some of the infosupplied re SAR:

 

Statements are in small print and only one year from date of SAR request even though account commenced in 1991.

 

Charges have been levied for

Account cover plus,

Account interest,

missed payment fee,

insufficient payment fee,

late payment fee,

debt collection letter,

debt collection telephone call fee,

 

 

and for just one year it totals £700 approx on an amount of £1000 balance in Sept 2012.

 

No copies of agreements,

or PPI agreements,

or account cover plus have been provided.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...