Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Insurance Loan-is this PPI?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3787 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good Evening,

 

I am not sure if I am posting on the correct thread :???:

 

I have come across paperwork for loans that I had with the Bank of Scotland in 1998 & 2000, it includes "Insurance Loan - Services being financed, Creditcare Insurance Premium (Cash Price)

 

Does anyone have any experience of these?

 

Thanks in advance,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Versions of PPI and credit card/loan protection I think, almost certainly reclaimable.

 

A SAR to the bank will provide the data for the basis of a reclaim.

 

I'll ask someone to look in as soon as they are available, more expert in reclaims.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG.

 

Single premium insurance added to the loan at the start is 99.99% to be PPI which can be reclaimed if mis-sold. There is no time limit in PPI reclaims.

 

Have you got all of the statements for these accounts or a record of all the payments made?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG.

 

Single premium insurance added to the loan at the start is 99.99% to be PPI which can be reclaimed if mis-sold. There is no time limit in PPI reclaims.

 

Have you got all of the statements for these accounts or a record of all the payments made?

 

Thanks for taking a look ims!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
Hi and welcome to CAG.

 

Single premium insurance added to the loan at the start is 99.99% to be PPI which can be reclaimed if mis-sold. There is no time limit in PPI reclaims.

 

Have you got all of the statements for these accounts or a record of all the payments made?

 

Hi ims,

 

You state that there is no time limit in PPI claims, however, I have read that you can only go back a set amount of years, what is the criteria?

 

Will a SAR request be enough? I am going back to 1997 & 2001 for two loans that were taken out, will I have to look out the statements or will the original paperwork be enough?

 

Apologies if this is a bit lengthy, any assistance will be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The six year limitation period would start from the date you discovered the "error".

 

In order to work out what redress you are due, you will need a record of the repayments made against the loans.

 

You already have the agreements (or at least the figures from them).

 

If these loans were paid off more than six years ago then there is a good chance that the lender won't have documentation for them.

 

This being the case, you would need to put in a claim and you would be relying on the lender to come up with a reasonably calculated offer.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The six year limitation period would start from the date you discovered the "error".

 

In order to work out what redress you are due, you will need a record of the repayments made against the loans.

 

You already have the agreements (or at least the figures from them).

 

If these loans were paid off more than six years ago then there is a good chance that the lender won't have documentation for them.

 

This being the case, you would need to put in a claim and you would be relying on the lender to come up with a reasonably calculated offer.

 

Thanks for the reply ims,

 

The loans were more than six years ago, I think I will send in a SAR and await their response, whilst I await a response I will search out my statements.

 

Thanks again, much appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be fantastic of you have got the statements because if the bank try to wriggle out of your claim then you will have ll of the relevant information to give them a bloody nose.

 

Looking to buy time until they respond, will be interesting if I can source my statements and compare with the banks,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I am about to send of my Subject Access Request to the Bank of Scotland, I have looked through the CAG Forum and there appears to be a few, have searched on-line and came across the following, Data Subject Access Request Dept, Lloyds Banking General Insurance, Tredegar Park, Newport, South Wales, NP10 8SB

 

Has any body else used this address succesfully?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Have you been able to do a spreadsheet showing how much you should get back?

 

The main form to send to the lender is the fos consumer questionnaire available from here

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/ppi.html

 

It is also a good idea to send a copy of the spreadsheet as well so that they know you are aware of what should be coming back.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ims, thanks for the reply

 

I have used a spreadsheet that I had previously, however, doesn't look quite right, can't seem to find the CAG one?

 

Thanks

 

Have you been able to do a spreadsheet showing how much you should get back?

 

The main form to send to the lender is the fos consumer questionnaire available from here

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/ppi.html

 

It is also a good idea to send a copy of the spreadsheet as well so that they know you are aware of what should be coming back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...