Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bill of sale with the funding corp


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3969 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I made the obvious ( now ) mistake of advising the funding corporation that due to relationship breakdown i will be going bankrupt.

 

They have now hounded me non stop for repo of my car.

 

I have read with great interest all the posts on here and a lot of help has been gained. I

 

am now in need of specific help/advice.

 

Around two years ago i missed a payment and at the time they agreed to add it to the end of my agreement,

they are now citing this as the reason that they are going to repo the car.

 

I have a man from the funding corp ( or at leat i say he is, he states he works for separate company who liase with the police relating to cars on finance being stolen ).

 

To be honest part of me wants to just hold my hands up and give up

but after reading posts on here part of me feels why should i when they have been nothing but a nigtmare for me from start to finish.

 

The car was sold to me on a bill of sale with a credit agreement that states is regulated by the CCA 1974.

 

This man is wanting me to tell him where the car is so he can collect it kind of now.

 

Is it correct he has to have a stamped copy of the bill of sale to do this??

 

And also i read with interet about where a car can be repossesed from,

can it be from a private work car park??

 

Any help greatfully received

Link to post
Share on other sites

wheres the court stamp on that bill of sale?

 

I cant see one!!

 

must be stamped to be legal.

 

contact the court and ask if its been registered

 

if its not

 

then tough they cant take the car.

 

and no he cannot repo from PRIVATE LAND/ROAD.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dx is spot on as usual. Get on to the court. If they take it and the bill isnt registered, then you can get them for theft.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

No logbook loan repossessions are not always legal,

if linked to a CCA agreement or if the BOS has not been registered with the high court.

If BOS registered then yes they can reposses, but have to show registration and debt details.

If linked to a CCA then can not reposses if on private property without a court order ( but can if on public road and under a third has only been paid ).

Over a third, they need a court order wherever it is.

020 7947 7772

QBEnforcement@hmcts.gsi.g ov.uk.

QB Enforcement Section, Room E15-E17, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL.

is the number to ring and check if your BoS has been registered.

many many are not!

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi allThanks so very much for your help. Think my next step is to make sure BOS is registered. Oh and i am guessing it is linked to a CCA as it states so and i do have a credit agreement with them and also there is more than a third paid.Again thanks so much for your time in replying to me.J

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi allThanks so very much for your help. Think my next step is to make sure BOS is registered. Oh and i am guessing it is linked to a CCA as it states so and i do have a credit agreement with them and also there is more than a third paid.Again thanks so much for your time in replying to me.J

 

I am afraid that the third rule does not apply apply to BOS agreements, they will seize the car under any of the five causes named in the 1882 act, if payments or missed or there are bankruptcy issues, although they do have to issue a default notice.

 

Also as said they cannot enter private land without a court order.

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...