Repossession questioned by deeds not being signed

[ims21]

We have received the document from applecart which is currently being reviewed.

[ims21]

Here you go. This is apple's reference document

 

[ATTACH]44248[/ATTACH]

[ims21]

What would you like the title changed to given that this started off as a thread about IS IT ME? and the friend?

[ims21]

Thank you for picking up on this ims21......

 

Is It Me advised he would like the thread title amended to: "Accord Mortgages and other lenders Deeds are Unenforcible"

 

Please see his post #731 for confirmation.

 

Apple

 

 

Hmm I'm not sure we would be happy making such a statement.

 

Perhaps a better way would be to call it

 

"Are Accord Mortgages and Other Lenders Deeds Enforceable? - Discuss"

[ims21]

Yes I am aware of the discussion thread.

 

We will not be carrying a thread title which categorically states that these agreements are unenforceable.

[ims21]

Not much of a 'discussion' then? : )

 

That's a shame,.... hope you don't mind me saying........ we are not talking 'agreements'...we are talking 'Deed's.... (no offence)

 

Apple

 

Ok even if it is deeds

 

We will not be carrying a thread title which categorically states that these deeds are unenforceable.

[ims21]

Hi Is It Me...

 

ims21...opened and shut the 'discussion'....it would appear based purely on my post......I thought others would have got a chance to comment...but, no...it seems I'm the 'culprit'...sorry mate...If I'd have known that would have been the result......without democratic intervention....I promise, I would not have contributed anything at all....

 

Apple

 

What I actually said was that we will not carry a thread title which categorically states that these deeds are unenforceable. That aspect is not up for discussion.

 

The thread title has been changed but is still being reviewed and may still need to be changed again.

[ims21]

Can the site team change the name to

" Repossession questioned by deeds not being signed"

 

Done

[ims21]

Is there any reason why this defence cannot be posted on the open forum?

[ims21]

You can create a Word document and post that or create a PDF and post either as an attachment.

 

Layout won't then be affected and the document may then be of benefit to others.

[ims21]

When did you last look?

[ims21]

Just before I posted the issue up to you.

 

Apple

 

Please try now as I have changed some settings for you

[ims21]

I have access to ...'insert link'......, insert email link....., insert image,..... insert video,...... wrap,

 

Nothing to 'attach'.......

 

I would really like to get the info on....so, if you are unable to assist...say by this afternoon....to save further delay....I'll just have to post it up on the thread....(or, if you send me an email addres for a site team member, I can send it as is....without losing any of the formatting).....................it's only about 4 pages long....

 

Apple

 

Use the "Go Advanced" button to reply to a message and then scroll down to "Manage Attachments". You can then upload Word Documents or a PDF and insert the attachment.

 

If you cannot see a "Go advanced" button or the "Manage Attachments" button I will have a look at the settings for you again.

[ims21]

Applecart's defence

 

[ATTACH]46750[/ATTACH]

[ims21]

hello CAG whats the policy regarding allowing people to share information privately. is CAG against this?

 

Why can you not post documents on the open forum?

 

One major point is that you never know who you are dealing with off forum despite what they may appear to be on the open forum.

[ims21]

It didn't refer to anyone.

 

With an anonymous forum you never know who anybody is.

[ims21]

There are some issues that are with Techie at the moment in respect of access to the site and/or various forums.

 

It will be sorted as soon as possible.

[ims21]

This thread has been allowed to continue so that those who are interested in the subject matter can explore the ideas put forward.

 

However, it now seems that the few contributors to the thread are not happy about being given this opportunity.

 

So, with regard to the PM facilities, we have asked that all dealings are in open forum in order that interested members can see the whole picture and that the information posted can be checked and verified. We have also pointed out the dangers of dealing via PM and passing personal information via that medium. As I have pointed out, if you send some personal information which identifies you to another person, you never know who that other person is. Some didn't seem to understand this concept when I posted it before.

 

We have also asked you to refrain from posting the ideas being discussed here in the threads of people who come here with an immediate and genuine need to stop an eviction. Sadly that request was not taken on board by some and they received short shrift from the people who deal with home repossession on a day to day basis and, I might add, extremely successfully.

 

These successes have been achieved by using tried and trusted methods and processes rather than the apparently untried and untested ideas being discussed in this thread.

 

Were I to be in the position of a new member coming here for help with saving my home in the immediacy, I would want to be guided through a process where there is a proven and visible record of success.

 

As far as number of views, viewers etc. are concerned, it would be unwise to read anything more into the figures than has been presented. The fact that this thread has received 60,000 + views means nothing in itself and cannot be used as a measure of strength of interest in the subject matter. In addition, the figure of 179 members who have viewed this thread is not a measure of any strength. That figure will include those who have dropped in for a cursory glance, those who are bored and are just browsing around along with those who may have a genuine interest. One would have thought that those who had a genuine interest may have made a contribution or asked a question but there are very few participants which may tell it's own story.

 

So to the business end of this post.

 

You have been allowed this thread to carry out these discussions. Remember please that there are no "rights" to post on CAG and that you have been "allowed" to have this discussion here.

 

We will not permit these untested ideas to be explored in the open forum on threads of people who have come here in serious fear of repossession and where the tried and trusted methods have served people extremely well in the past. If we see that this requirement is not adhered to then we may have to impose some account restriction.

 

PM facilities are afforded to those who use them in the spirit in which they are meant and can be withdrawn from any member at any time. Again, please keep all information in the open forum. If this is not done then surely you are depriving those very people who have an interest in your topic of relevant information.

 

We will not permit any more swipes or derogatory posts about the site team or anyone else. Failure to adhere to this requirement may lead to account restrictions for those involved.

 

We will not enter into arguments on these points and any posts which seek to challenge the above will be removed.

 

Please now keep this thread on the actual subject matter in hand.

[ims21]

PM facility is not blocked on this thread.

[ims21]

PM facilities are dealt with on an individual basis and not on a thread by thread basis.

[ims21]

My answer is above

[ims21]

Members who have a number of posts which is below a certain threshold do not have the ability to PM other members. They can, however PM any of the Site Team.

 

Above that threshold, PM facilities are dealt with on an individual basis depending on behaviour of the member in question. An example would be where there is touting for business involved.

[ims21]

Ben.....like Jabba.....Please be quiet!!

 

Apple

 

Applecart, you are very close to overstepping the mark.

 

behave.

[ims21]

All are welcome to post on this thread but within the forum rules.

 

bhall is putting an alternative (as have others) and they are perfectly entitled to do this without attracting abuse from other posters.

 

People should read this thread and make their own decisions as to whether they wish to act on the ideas presented or steer well clear. That is a matter for each individual.

 

Yes, Bankfodder is the top dog on CAG.

[ims21]

The idea of an open forum is that all can post relatively freely.

 

Just because your opinions do not match those of others is no reason to prevent people from posting their comments and analysis and questions.

 

This is a thread open to all.