Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Citifinancial card - Clarity DCA just paid poss SB'ed already Help Please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4090 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My fiance received correspondence from Clarity DCA - we aren't sure if this is likely to be Statute Barred as we have checked credit file and it doesn't show there and we have done a registry search and no CCJ's are present.

 

Clarity haven't mentioned if legal action was taken, and if not because the last payment made according to them was December 2006 then we assume it was SB in December 2012 - is that right?

 

Note that they wrote to him in October 2012 but he hasn't acknowledged the debt in writing, he just rang them and said he wanted more details about it and then they sent a copy of the original agreement but we have no details of what he paid off it etc.

 

He didn't make any payment to Clarity until February 2013, where he paid the odd £83 over the phone.

 

I just want to check what's best to do - here is the letter:

 

 

Letter from Clarity re Citifinancial dated 12 October 2012

Our client Britannica Recoveries

Balance £6083

Loan Taken out 13 November 2003

Last payment made December 2006

(my partner rang them and asked them to send a copy of the original agreement to him and they emailed it to him on 31 January 2013. The agreement showed the date it was taken out as 13 November 2003. He then rang them up in February 2013, paid off the odd £83 by debit card and set up a direct debit of £50 per month).

 

The £50 direct debit hasn't started it was due to start in April 2013 but we have now cancelled it.

 

We think an SB letter might be the right way to go, but they might start saying they contacted us in October 2012 before the 6 years was up?

 

Thanks in advance for any advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

cancel that DD now

 

and use chargeback tto get that payment back

you've been spoofed

 

it was SB'ed when you paid

 

so its STILL SB'd

 

nohing can unbar a debt not even a judge.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://whatconsumer.co.uk/visa-debit-chargeback/

 

i'll get someone to do you a letter

 

about the SB bit anddemanding your money back as you've been fleeced into paying it was already sb'd.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, looking in as dx suggested, I will read through your thread and put a letter together for you in the next 24 hours until then please do nothing.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you both.

 

I've just found another letter they sent him dated 7 February 2013

 

"We wrote to you recently but our records indicate that we have not reached an agreement with you. We would like to work with you to agree a solution which us both affordable to you and acceptable for our client. We can of course only do this if you contact us,

 

If we do not hear from you we will need to work with our client to consider the options available. These include our representative, Fieldcall Ltd, visiting you at your home to reach an agreement with you.

We very much hope and expect that this can be avoided and we look forward to hearing from you"

 

At this point my partner paid them £83.00 over the phone and was told he would have to set up a payment plan for £50 per month for ten years or a settlement of £4562.25

 

Really worrying reading the bit about the Fieldcall calling to the house now :sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

you do realise these muppets are NOT BAILIFFS

 

they have NO LEGAL POWERS..

 

sorry but they had you blind.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

never heard of fieldcall

 

your CAT has more powers than they do.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Field Call Ltd, Based in Northampton, dediicated field visit company also has ''councelling'' services, quite ''persistant''in their approach, but as dx said NOT bailiffs, NO legal powers in fact nothing other than bein a pert.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

cancel that DD now

 

and use chargeback tto get that payment back

you've been spoofed

 

it was SB'ed when you paid

 

so its STILL SB'd

 

nohing can unbar a debt not even a judge.

 

dx

 

Hello

 

I mentioned this to someone and they said there is no way I can do a chargeback on something like this. it's just tough luck. Not sure if anyone has succesfully done a chargeback after paying a barred debt???

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes you can

 

paid under duress

 

go get 'em!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dx is correct the bank should act immediately if a payment was made under durress, imparticular if threats 0f any type of inappropriate enforcement prodedures are made.

 

So we have a situation where payment has been AFTER the debt has become statute barred? The problem here an getting any payments back is that the debt stillexists in law BUT the creditor/DCA cannot enforce the debt through the courts, also if the debtor has NOT informed the creditor in writting that the debt IS statute barred and they will not be paying (as per OFT Guidance 2003 updated Nov.2012 any payments made prior to this statement are usulally considered as ''gifted'' to the creditor and as such are not recoverable.

 

So I'll deal with a letter for the actual statute barred ststus.

 

To The Data Controller

 

Clarity

 

Ref: use the one on their letter.

 

Sir/ Madam,

 

 

Formal Notification.

 

I refer to recent corresponce from Clarity regarding an alleged debt for £ xxxx xxx originating fro an account with xxxxxxxxxx, please note I do not accept any liability for the alleged and this letter is NOT acknowledgment that any libility subsists.

 

 

I have now checke my credit history and have concluded that this debt is statute barred and in fact was already statute barred on xx xx xxxx when a pyment was made, therefore NO further payments will be made now or in the future.

 

Clarity may attempt to claim that making the said payment has restarted the 6 year ''clock'' and that the limitation period has been extended please note I am fully aware that this not the case and any such challenge to the status of the debt has no merit.

 

I consider that Clarity has misled me regarding the status of the debt and has unfairly taken payment of £ xxx .xx knowing full well that no such payments should have been made, any direct debit facility has been cancelled and Clarity will be held liable for any attempts to take payments and I will seek to recover any charges accrued by Clarity attempting to claim further funds.

 

Clarity should now seriously consider refunding any payments taken since contact was made.

 

For clarification this account is STATUTE BARRED and NO PAYMENT WILL BE MADE.

 

Clarity will now cease to process all data relating to me and remove it from its records and conirm that these instuctions have been carried out within 7 working days.

 

Send by RM recorded delivery and check receipt..

 

Pls let me know the result.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...