Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI on top of PPI on top of PPI on loans


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4110 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello one and all

 

Site donation due, but can someone please provide instructions on how to please

 

I received a payment from the Bank before I even received thier letter with regards ppi on a loan and then refinanced with another loan provided by them.

 

EXAMPLE

 

Loan 1 PPI (Bank)

Loan 2 PPI refinanced PPI (Bank)

 

Problem is refinanced again with another loan not bank

 

Loan 3 PPI refinanced loan (Egg loan - ppi on this loan already paid back)

 

What and should I, write back to my bank and state, as I have no idea how to explain the above and whether they are even responsible for me getting this last loan to pay off thier loan 6 months later and also a credit card bill :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

so lloyds was refinanced by egg?

 

trying to match this into your existing threads

rather than guess

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello once again DX

 

Thanks for your help, but previous threads are not really related to this one.

 

If I posted all the issues with general insurance and credit cards loans and even pension there would be about 15-20 theads. Been such an idiot.

 

PS gonna use the donation link when son gets up, figured out about donation - just never used PAYPAL.

 

:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so i'm trying to workout what you are asking.

 

you had 2 loans that rolled with one bank

 

then a third from another bank that paid those off

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and the banks are

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You already guessed - may have to have user id changed.

 

Worse still I might as well complicate matters even further.

 

I had a business loan "non-cancellable agreement" with first bank, one of the exclusions was must work for the company for at least 16 hours per week.

 

Anyway's - first bank state we agree your insurance was mis-sold, but because you Ltd has been dissolved we cannot correct the mistake (not what the FOS state) mis-sold is mis-sold.

 

But I get the feeling that the first personal loan may of been used to pay some of the "Business Loan" too - but needs confirming. See what I mean about 15 threads.

 

Thanks

 

Mike

Link to post
Share on other sites

no need for a username chagne at all.

 

and you are correct

it was a ltd co. still should be returned

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX

 

FOS and you think the same,

but I get the feeling now that the reason the settlement for the personal loans was "Bank A"

Hope I don't realise I have a PPi,

onto a PPI onto a PPI onto another external PPI loan and then a re-mortgage

 

What I am thinking is "Deny first business loan" so the PPI starts with second personal loan and finishes with third personal loan? hence payment before letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

whoosh........

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoosh you lost me there mate, lol don't really help with getting an idea on what to write when reclaiming, but at least I can now giggle at my past mistakes. Thanks :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats what woosh means you lost me...

 

you've a knack of explaining things in the most obscure way..

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry here is an explanation, hope its kind of clear and not obscure

 

Business Loan Bank (A) - One of the exclusions means could never claim on it. - mis-sold PPI

 

Bank (A) - States we accept the insurance was mis-sold, but because you have not got the business account to refund it too claim rejected, Ltd Co dis-solved

 

Personal Loan (1) Bank (A) - Repays remainder of Business loan, this loan (1) has PPI on it again mis-sold

Personal Loan (2) Bank (A) - Repays personal loan (1) this loan (2) has PPI on it again mis-sold

Personal Loan (3) Bank (B) - Repays personal loan (2) to Bank (A), this loan (3) has PPI on it again mis-sold

 

Re-financed after 4-5 years with a re-mortgage to pay off remainder of loan (3)

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

After a little rooting it looks as though the business loan was paid off before the initial first personal loan.

 

Now just wondering if a loan is refinanced but not with the same Bank is it still worth trying to reclaim refinanced PPI?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont know of anyone that has successfully charged a PPI provider

interest from another account/bank.

 

however there is nothing to stop you knocking up a ppi reclaim

 

as long as you know the PPI PCM %

you then charge that on the refinance figure over to the other loan.

 

have you all the statements

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello DX

 

Something to pass onto other CAG user requests regarding refinancing loans with PPI.

 

Spoke today to FOS - Informed me that parts 1 & 2 can be dealt with regarding personal loans with Lloyd's, As to part 3 Egg loan and refinanced Lloyd's loan they will not take on the case as its a another party and should be dealt with separately.

 

So DX your initial thought is correct - big shame otherwise I would have right up till 2012 from 2001

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...