Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI SIngle Premium on Loan - Advice needed on Loan Interest reclaim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4143 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I am a little brain dead today, having read through reams of LTSB loans documents (and other documents) provided under a DSAR.

 

I have my Loan statements, of loans which were consolidated into other loans (twice), and have read the excellent threads and guidance on spreadsheets on single PPI reclaims.

 

I thought I had it all sussed - until I was entering some figures into the spreadsheet, by reading the figures from my Loan Statement.

 

I thought I was quite savvy with figures,

having calculated the settlement figures from loan 1 which are rolled into Loan 2,

and the relevant % of each payment relevant to PPI#1 and PPI#2 etc.

 

However I was only looking at monthly payments and totals - not lines of added interest.

 

The loan I have doesn't add the interest upfront (like NRAM loans)

this is the more regular type of loan which decrease each month with interest calculated and added each month.

 

The problem I have is the interest charges on the loan, for example (not my real figures)

 

Loan repayments :

2/1/04 £150 Monthly repayment (PPI element = 20% of total so therefore PPI value for spreadsheet = £30)

2/2/04 £150 Monthly Repayment (PPI element = 20% of total so therefore PPI value for spreadsheet = £30)

 

but what about these entries

1/1/04 £60 interest charges

1/2/04 £60 interest charges

 

I have read through the guides on PPI and it says that interest is handled separately on the forum - but I have been unable to find it.

 

I have all of the interest charges on each month of every loan, so do I take the 20% of the interest charge as the 'actual interest' element charges on top of the PPI.

 

I'm sure the answer is simple, but my day is fogged up with LTSB and I can't see or think clearly!

 

And then do I just add a line entry into the spread sheet for interest element also?

eg lines would be

PPI £30

interest £6

PPI £30

interest £6 etc

 

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

I think I need a little break.

Back Soon & Thanks

CS

Link to post
Share on other sites

interest doesn't come into it. that is covered already by the PPI payment.....

 

on your loan agreements it will give a figure per month that PPI costs you.

 

you use that figure in the spreadsheet wherever you made the FULL PAYMENT [the figure to the right on the agreement]

 

if you paid more or less in one month, or settled

you need to use the PPI PCM% calculation [PPI element/full PCM * 100 = PPI PCM%]

 

 

if you want i'll post one up

as i've done lots of lloyds loans.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx,

 

Thanks for your response. I don't know where my need to charge them extra for additional interest came from! I think maybe I was just trying to overcharge them like they have me over the years :wink:

 

I've been in a LTSB haze over the past week or so.

 

thanks for your help, still many lines to go on the excel sheets. I've been on a DMP for over 6 years (PPI wasn't stopped!), with several different payments so lots of pro-rata calculations happening at the moment, on top of 3 roll over PPI's.

 

thanks

CS

Link to post
Share on other sites

hope its a free dmp?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Yes the DMP is PP.

 

At first I was happy, and they have been good throughout the years. But they didn't get interest stopped on LTSB or BC - which has been as major problem for me, as over six and a half years later I have AP's on BC with no sight of the end yet due to their interest charges.

 

However more recently, PP have delayed a few payments from them to creditors, which have caused issues with a default being registered with LTSB 6 years after the DMP started! I hadn't missed any payments to trigger it!

 

Which is what prompted the LTSB SAR request etc. I got SAR from PP too, and was quite surprised when the records didn't match - it goes towards an explanation as to why I've received 6 years of 'arrears' letters from LTSB.

 

As I am now more financially aware, and should have most of the debts cleared by the end of this year, over £60k paid up. I am going to start to self manage for this final year, to ensure payments get there on time and I am in control of payments.

 

Thanks to this site for the help, it has given me the confidence to take them on, pay them under my terms and fight back with COBS/BCOBS - only one sent off so far but more on the way. I am preparing about 10k in PPI claims too, just collating many SAR statements and documents for each creditor.

I was young an naive and I was taken advantage of (I have extensive cover at work) and not once did I select PPI. I'm older and wiser having been through the mill a bit over the past 7 years!

 

Thanks again for your help

 

CS

Link to post
Share on other sites

aha the old AP marker

 

you do know that a brig letter will prob get that debt removed?

 

the AP markers over such a long period is deemed as unfair

 

and ever more now they isued a default.

give brig a shout to pop in.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...