Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Sainsburys Loan - Started Claim in 2008 but Sainsburys Declined - Advice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4150 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I took out a Sainsburys loan during September 2001. I applied via the telephone and remember to this day the man I spoke to saying that I had been accepted for the loan, however unless I took out their "Credit Care Silver" insurance, then he wouldnt be able to go ahead and process it. The loan was for £3000 and the CreditCare Silver was an additional £331.50.

 

Here is a copy of the agreement.

 

Back in 2008 I claimed back any bank charges I had incurred and attempted to claim back the PPI. I sent Sainsburys a letter and this was the reply I received.

 

Dear Powerful_Rogue,

 

My understanding of your concerns is as follows:

 

You have explained that you purchased the above policy from us in September 2001 but now believe that it was mis-sold because you believe that you were not given the correct information when the policy was sold and the adviser stated that taking out the policy was essential for you to get the associated credit.

 

I have carried out an investigation into your concerns and would like to confirm my findings.

 

Your policy was taken out on 6th September 2001. At this time the General Insurance Standards Council (GISC) Private Customer Code applied. The principles of which, amongst others, required us to act fairly and reasonably, and give you enough information and help so you can make an informed decesion, before you make a final commitment to buy your insurance policy. Although this was a voluntary code, we subscribed to this, providing you with Policy Booklets and Schedules explaining your policy.

 

I have not found any evidence that would lead me to believe you were given the impression that the policy was a condition of taking out the load or that the loan would be compromised or not proceed without the inclusion of protection cover. The application form indicates that the cover would not be provided unless you specified in the relevant section that you wanted it and in this case the adviser completed the section on your behalf.

 

You then had a few days to consider whether you wanted to benefit from the protection that the policy offered and the cost of the cover was clearly separate from the loan.

 

Our records show that you approved the advisers actions by endorsing the application from with your signature and if you decide after the event that you did not require the cover, the policy literature would have detailed your cancellation rights advising that you had 30 days to cancel the policy.

 

In conclusion, you were eligible for the cover, it was a suitable product to meet your needs, it has never been our policy to insist that repayments cover must be taken out in connection with a loan, and it is a fair and reasonable product. As such there will be no refund. [/Quote]

That was back in 2008 and unfortunately feeling deflated and with little information about PPI claimbacks, I filed the letter and left it.

 

My question now is whether im too late to start a claim and whether ive blown my chance by contacting Sainsburys back in 2008.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no time limit on PPI reclaims

 

as for the above

pure speculation it was offered correctly

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...