Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Partnership penalties


oh.for.a.lottery.win
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4167 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi OFALW,

 

Are you certain that you filed the P/ship Return in addition to your individual Tax Returns.

 

When you submit any return using the on-line system, you get a receipt for it and this should be used to prove that any submission was made on time.

 

Stop calling HMRC as phone calls tend to be frustrating and pointless. You'll be told one thing by a human being but then "The System" will continue to do whatever it was you called to complain about.

 

Keep your complaints in writing only and, if you fail to get the proper result from initial letters, use the complaints procedures to appeal and escalate your complaint.

 

I also suggest you send a paper copy of the return confirming the time and date it was submitted including the HMRC Submission Receipt Number if you have it.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you checked through your old emails.

 

You may have rec'd one from HMRC confirming receipt of the P/ship Return when you sent it.

 

Alternatively, if it appears that, for some reason, the P/ship return was NOT rec'd by HMRC even thought you believe you sent it at the same time as the Personal Returns, do you have a copy of it.

 

Have you checked on your HMRC Portal to see if the P/ship return is visible from your end of their system.

 

Either print of a copy of the P/ship Return if you can, or print off a blank copy of one and fill it in manually. Then fwd it to HMRC saying something like :-

 

Dear sir or madam,

 

I refer to previous correspondence about the submission of the Partnership Tax Return for the year ended 5th April 2011.

 

I used appropriate software to submit my Personal Tax Return and the Partnership Tax Return before the 30th January 2012 deadline.

 

However, it appears that, for some unknown reason, the HMRC system has not received the return or it has been mislaid.

 

Could you please check your system to see if the Partnership Return has been mislaid or in some way mis-filed.

 

If your search proves fruitless, please let me know and I will supply a copy of the document.

 

In the meantime, will you please withdraw the initial and subsequent penalties that have been issued concerning this matter. If you failed to receive the Partnership Return, it is due to a technical error and not any failure or neglect on my part.

 

When Returns are submitted in the future, I will certainly double check they are shown as received by HMRC and keep copies of the relevant submission receipts.

 

I hope you will look favourably on this request as I believe I complied with my obligations which I take seriously.

 

Yours faithfully,

  • Confused 1

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...