Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Egg [Now Canada Square Operations plc] LOAN - PPI SUCCESS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4195 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just thought I'd flag this as another success, received a cheque for 1869 quid.

 

 

Here's the story:

 

About 6 years ago I had been an Egg card customer for a couple of years and we needed to replace some old wooden windows and have some decorating done.

 

The lot was going to come to about 16 grand, Egg had a good loan rate on at the time so I decided to approach them.

 

I thought it better to do it by phone so I could fully explain my finances and what I wanted the money for.

 

Was on the phone with an underwriter for about 40 minutes going through everything, she gave me the monthly cost over 5 years which was about 340 quid a month which was fine with protection and I didn't twig at the time this really should have been optional but I thought I better take it otherwise she may not approve the loan (that was certainly how it sounded)

 

Anyway we completed the call and she indicated she had authorised the payment of the amount into my account and it should appear next day.

 

Sure enough there it was, there was about 4 grand on top for the premium which was paid to Norwich Union.

 

As the months went on I began to think 'surely the amount owed would go down quicker if I got rid of the PPI'.

 

I let it run for about 12 months so Egg could see there was no issues with the repayments, but then I sent them a message asking for it to be cancelled as I wanted more of the payment to go against paying off the loan amount.

 

They agreed.

 

I thought no more about it until last year when I was nearly made redundant but thankfully that didn't happen but I did go from shifts to office hours (I was paid a shift allowance and the union agreed a lump sum mitigation payment to allow us to adjust to being without it)

 

While all this was going on I received a letter from Egg indicating the loan was being sold to Brittanica-Moorgate and would be serviced by Moorgate Loan Servicing.

 

A bit of research unconvered a complex web of companies, some of whom operated out of Luxembourg.

 

I received the lump sum from my employer in my July pay and decided to get rid of what remained of the loan with it as the company was also referred to as Brittanica-Moorgate recoveries (I had not missed a single payment on any financial commitment and did not want my bank getting spooked by this as I know from friends that have had financial trouble that debts are usually sold to recovery firms)

 

I rang and got a settlement figure and the account details I needed to make the payment then rang my bank to do the transfer (as it was nearly 5 grand I didn't want anything to go wrong)

 

Bank did the payment and I rang Moorgate back to confirm the money should now be in their account.

 

They said they would issue a letter indicating the loan had been settled (had to chase this a couple of times but it did come eventually) and thought no more about it.

 

After hearing Martin Lewis talking about PPI I did wonder a couple of times whether I should look into it but as the loan had been sold on and I didn't think Egg Banking plc still existed I didn't think I'd get anywhere as I didn't know what company would now be responsible.

 

Around August I got a letter from Canada Square Operations plc (letterhead indicated it was formerly Egg Banking plc) stating they were now responsible for the PPI sold by Egg and they enclosed a claim form.

 

I let it sit there for a couple of weeks and then filled it in and sent it back

 

Two weeks later got a letter confirming receipt.

 

Three weeks later another saying it was being investigated.

 

Another few weeks later got a letter saying the complaint had been upheld and offering me the settlement figure above, signed the form and sent it back, cheque arrived last week, sent it to my bank and it was showing on my account last Friday, just leaving it to clear now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...