Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CPP or CITI/OPUS fee reclaim???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4155 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I opened a credit card with The Associates some 10 years or so ago. Subsequently they were taken over by Citi Financial and more recently by OPUS.

I have contacted CPP to request a fee reclaim but they told me that it was nothing to do with them as I was referred to them by The Associates! They are no longer in existence so I contacted OPUS to reclaim and they said it ws nothing to do with them and I was to contact CPP!

I'm being passed pillar to post here - has anyone got any ideas as to who should take ownership of my request/claim??

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no idea ims21 but strictly speaking I don't think it is a PPI claim as it is more of a misold useless insurance scheme going under the name of Card Protection Plan to which I was coerced into paying for. Please re-post to another forum if you think this is incorrect!

 

 

 

As you have posted in the PPI forum I assume this is for a PPI claim?

 

If so read here

 

http://www.citibank.co.uk/personal/banking/info/contactus/feedback/ppicomplaints.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have reported about this myself having experienced EXACTLY the same.

My card was also an associates which Citi rebranded circa 2000/2001

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I did just that ims21/MARTIN3030 and have finally received a response from OPUS stating that "the policy provided by CPP is for card protection only, this is different to PPI.....card protection is not included in the hight court ruling relating to the possible mis-selling of insurance policies....if you wish to pursue this matter further then you will need to contact CPP directly...".

I have already contacted CPP who denied all responsibility as have OPUS now. What (if any) is my next step?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Any ideas guys?? Anyone??? :???:

 

I did just that ims21/MARTIN3030 and have finally received a response from OPUS stating that "the policy provided by CPP is for card protection only, this is different to PPI.....card protection is not included in the hight court ruling relating to the possible mis-selling of insurance policies....if you wish to pursue this matter further then you will need to contact CPP directly...".

I have already contacted CPP who denied all responsibility as have OPUS now. What (if any) is my next step?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is Citicard you are liable and they recently accepted liability and made a payment.in my own case with Associates CPP.

Do you have your original account number ?

In my own case,like you I was told by CPP that it was Citi who set up the policy.

CPP referred my complaint to Citicard,who then sent me an FOS form to fill in and said they would be investigating it.

That was in June 2012.It took them until Late November to make a refund.

I did not return the FOS Q &A form since as far as I know,there is no obligation to have to do this.

From memory,at the time of the Associates card,and also the period which followed,the fee for the CPP was about £25.It was automatically taken each year,and I think there were also monthly amounts taken.

If you have not got statements,you will have to calculate it based on estimated amounts.

I have already posted the address that you need to be sending this too in the thread in Citi forums.

You need to be firm with them putting it in writing that you do not expect the matter to be complicated in resolving and should not take months.

Work out what is owed and add the interest.

If you need any further help just ask.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Martin3030, I followed your advise and sent a further letter a month ago it read (amongst ather things) " I have recently become aware ofthe mis-selling of Consumer Card Protection and I have knowledge of the recentinvestigations into the Policy by the Financial Services Authority. I believeyou have not treated me fairly for the following reasons:

  • The Card Protection Policy was added without my full knowledge.
  • The Card Protection Policy exclusions were never properly explained, so I was unable to make an informed decision as to whether this policy was required or not.
  • I was not asked whether I already had any existing policies that would cover any unauthorised use of my card.
  • There was never any agreed contract for the policy.
  • I had no use for this policy.

Unless you can prove without doubt that thispolicy is fair, reasonable and suitable for my needs, I demand to be placedback into the position I would have been had this Card Protection Policy notbeen included. I will therefore demand a full refund of all of my payments andcompound interest charges as detailed on the attached spreadsheet. For yourinformation, I have previously submitted correspondence to you on October 15th2012 together with a completed payment protection insurance questionnaire whichwas then incorrectly forwarded by yourselves to OPUS Ltd. I now expect CITI to take ownership ofthis ongoing issue and resolve the situation immediately."

I have not received ANY response to this day! What would your further suggestions be?

Regards, Johnny.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Martin3030, I followed your advise and sent a further letter a month ago it read (amongst ather things) " I have recently become aware ofthe mis-selling of Consumer Card Protection and I have knowledge of the recentinvestigations into the Policy by the Financial Services Authority. I believeyou have not treated me fairly for the following reasons:

  • The Card Protection Policy was added without my full knowledge.
  • The Card Protection Policy exclusions were never properly explained, so I was unable to make an informed decision as to whether this policy was required or not.
  • I was not asked whether I already had any existing policies that would cover any unauthorised use of my card.
  • There was never any agreed contract for the policy.
  • I had no use for this policy.

Unless you can prove without doubt that thispolicy is fair, reasonable and suitable for my needs, I demand to be placedback into the position I would have been had this Card Protection Policy notbeen included. I will therefore demand a full refund of all of my payments andcompound interest charges as detailed on the attached spreadsheet. For yourinformation, I have previously submitted correspondence to you on October 15th2012 together with a completed payment protection insurance questionnaire whichwas then incorrectly forwarded by yourselves to OPUS Ltd. I now expect CITI to take ownership ofthis ongoing issue and resolve the situation immediately."

I have not received ANY response to this day! What would your further suggestions be?

Regards, Johnny.

 

 

 

Any suggestions at all??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...