Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Citifinancial Not being Fair


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4251 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I am posting a thread here for the first time and it is on behalf of my parents.

 

they took out a loan in June 1997 and have made all payments since and never missed a payment.

 

So as far as they are concerned their 15 year loan agreement was going to end in June 2012.

 

However, Citifinancial sent them a letter stating that in June telling tham that they still owed Citifinancial over £2000 because of interest on missed payments.

 

My parents paid approx 95% of the monthly amount and the other 5% was made by the DWP (father had an industrial injury).

 

My parents were baffled by this as they always made their payments on time (via their branch formerly known as Avco but they shut down)

and then via cheques that were sent to Citifinancial directly.

 

a complaint was made and they first stated that it was an error on their part as the DWP amount was not taken into account.

 

But then they again stated they still owed them the money

and they sent a statement from the past 2 years showing all payments being made on time but still showing a balance of over £2000.

 

The issue is that because the loan was secured (parents have paid off mortgage to their provider)

 

they have yesterday sent a letter that they will instruct solicitors to sell the house and recover the amount owing to them,

 

even though an official complaint was made to them 7 weeks ago asking them for a full explanantion on how a balance of over £2000 can be owed,

 

even though my parents made all their payments on time, they never received any letters stating that there was any overdue amount owing because of interest on late payments.

 

I feel that this organisation are being dishonest and vile,

it is quite convinient to ask for a balance owing at the same time the agreement should have ended.

 

Can anybody please help as my parents

 

don't know what to do as they have made a complaint

but in the 7th week of the 8 week period given for Citifinancial to respond to the claim,

their collections department are threatening them with legal action

and their property being sold without their consent

(even though deed is with my parents and mortgage has ended).

 

 

Sorry about the rant and the length of the post.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you all the statements?

 

sounds like PENALTY charges

 

ignore the threat-o-gram about selling the house

garbage!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the quick reply DX

 

They have not/will not send all the statements.

 

Is it worth me contatcing their collections department tommorow and telling them that an official claim has already been made and that they should stop sending junk through the post to my parents.

 

Or should they consider asking for all their history of payments via some sort of request (is it a SAR?) and if so how can my parents do this?

 

Finally call them and tell remind them abou the claim and wait for their response at the end of the 8 week period.

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

never call only one - you need a paper trail writing ONLY.

 

send them an sar

they must comply, its a legal request.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They certainly wont get an order for sale for £2K, and it is wrong for them to try that.

 

Yes you are correct the Subject Access Request is the way to go now, there is a £10 statutory fee for the SAR, the creditor has 40 days to comply, there is a remplate in the CAG library, amend to suit.

 

The SAR should de addressed to the creditors Data Controller maked Private & Confidential. and sent by recorded delivery, so you can ckeck delivery, the 40 days starts when they receive it.

 

Send the following seperately to their compliance manager, recorded delivery.

 

Ref: as on their letter.

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

I refer toyour letter dated xx xx xxxx in which you alleged an amount of £2000.00 remains to be paid in regard to account No. xxxxxxxxxx, please take note we do not acknowledge that any obligation still subsists on this account.

 

All due payments have been made on time and have been supplimented by a 5% contribution from the DWP, therefore no oustanding amount can be claimed.

 

Giving due consideration to this matter it would appear maladadministration onn behalf of your company has resulted in the unfounded claim now being made.

 

This matter is now formally in dispute and this letter may be considered a formal complaint, copies if necessary will be made to the appropriate regulators and finally to the Financial Ombudsman Service should you fail to rectify this very obvious mistake.

 

This letter is sent by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery and receipt will be tracked.

 

Get SAR ready but send the letter earlier if possible.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...