Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CCJ paid for 9 Years but has PPI on PPI Loans


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3212 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i wouldn't just stop paying, there is a CCJ in place whatever the CRA shows and you have ample evidence of the chain of assignment;

 

if you stop paying the creditor can take action to enforce the debt such as bailiffs or applying for a charge and then sale of your property.

The creditor can at any time apply for a variation to the original order to change the payment amount so that advice is also totally incorrect.

 

implying that you need only pay for 6 years and then the CCJ is somehow satisfied, even when thousands of pounds are still owing, is entirely beyond me.

poss confused the CRA file with the right to enforce an unpaid CCJ but that is a very strange mistake to make.

 

I hope you see this message in good time to keep making the ordered payment to the creditor.

Edited by asokn
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

if it were me i would stop payment

and force their hand...

 

what HAVE you got on me marlin.....

 

NOTHING!!

 

come on then, take me court - bet they cant

 

you weren't who took the CCJ out in the first place.

so cant just jump in with a CO after 9yrs anyhow.

 

dx

 

So you force their hand and they make you bankrupt or take all of your assets or force a sale of the house etc...

 

Once the payment arrangement is defaulted on the entire remaining sum becomes due in full and is enforceable.

 

I'm sorry but the advice being given above is terrible advice, if you want to play games with the judgment creditor then do so with your own debts; don't advise a stranger to take such a stupid and unnecessary risk with their life.

 

To correct another piece of inaccurate advice, there is no limitation on a charging order application.

Edited by asokn
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I would also appreciate it if the mods stopped editing important parts of my posts; this is far too serious an issue to the OP for the rest of us to dance around the obvious inaccuracies in the advice being given by others. I believe the primary purpose of this forum is to give good advice, the advice being given is negligent, irresponsible and would be hugely damaging to the OP if followed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you have your advise to give

i have mine,

your advise it is always good, never had any issue with it & never will - i dont operate that way.

 

but try not to be personaly confrontational - there is no need for it.

 

IF marlin know about the CCJ then my advise is crass

but if they don't it's A way to go

 

sadly i've seen this before. twice now,

 

lets wait and see

but as the PPI reclaim will wipe the debt out

 

we will never know!

 

keep up the good work asokn.

 

dx

 

The OP has now had the benefit of different views on this issue and has made an informed choice. That's the aim at the end of the day so a job well done by all!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...