Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI claim on defaulted loan??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4346 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I recently made a PPI claim, on a old Natwest loan, the said the owed me XXXX number made up of interest and payments, up till now i have had interest paid but none of the payments?

 

Since then i have been written to by 'Bank Smart' saying i took a loan with First Direct, which i did and it has insurance, i pressume they are canvassing for work and will charge me a princely sum for doing so?

 

Thing is this was with First Direct and when i got into financial trouble i CCA'd them and they had no paperwork so they stopped pursuing and removed it from my credit file, this was sometime ago.

 

If i go for a claim on this would i be re opening a can of worms? i think it would be statute barred now anyway.

 

Any advice would be welcomed.

 

Ollie pup

Link to post
Share on other sites

no go for for it.

 

they can only offset against notifed arrears contained in notice of sums in arrears letter.

 

dont quite understand your first line though.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry as usual i was asking two questions in one,

 

i have since phoned Natwest to confirm why i have only received interest payments on that claim

and as you say the rest has been used to offset, good news is it will clear the debt and i should get some back!

 

So with the new first direct claim it won't arouse them to start pursuing me again?

it is off the file and prob 6 years old, so if they get a payment from the PPI it won't mean i have admitted liability by a payment going onto the account?

 

And Bank Smart, are they just canvessing for business?

 

Things could be looking up.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

bank smartcost +30%

 

now back to nw

how old was ths account?

 

ever get any letters?

 

there is NO automactic right of offset

 

there are rules!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt is prob 5 or 6 years old, i've been paying it for nearly 3 years, irwin mitchell sols are holding it, there is 600 quid outstanding on the debt but the offset for ppi premiums is about 1300 quid, so if they do offset they said i will get some back, sound ok?

 

Only letters i get are statements from NW on the account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i suppose we need to ask

would you do this anyhow?

to get rid of the debt?

 

ideally, if you are in ARREARS that is they only time

they should off-set

 

and they should be sending you a letter better than once every 6 months

entitled 'notice of sums in arrears'

 

without these, they should not be any off-set.

 

if you want to question them

 

then go ahead

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...