Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFC paid PPI refund to Lowells


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4344 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Posting for a friend,

currently in dispute with Lowells,

claiming for statute barred debt (Scotland), os balance £380 which originated from HFC.

 

Reclaimed PPI from HFC and was offered £280 which he accepted.

 

Ph HFC today enquiring where monies were and was told they had paid the monies to Lowells.

 

He wasn`t informed at anytime this was going to happen.

 

If a PPI refund is for monies he has already paid for missold insurance,

can they legally give this to Lowells?

Any advice appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In Scotland the debt is extinguished after 5 years under SB.

 

So first off....is your friend absolutely sure it is SB?

 

Did Lowell buy the debt and was a "Notice of Assignment" received OR do HFC still own the account?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi he is positive it`s SB, he cannot remember receiving a Notice of Assignment and received letter from Lowells few months ago chasing debt so he assumes they have bought the debt from HFC

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first one is a statement of account saying he is due £380 as he has fallen behind with payments.

He is in dispute over the SB as they claim he made a payment in July 2007 therefore debt is not SB.

 

He has asked for proof of this payment as he was unemployed at this time

and had already fallen seriously behind with other debtors,

so he knows he did not pay it, but he has not received proof yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you either post up the first letter he received from Lowell or type it up if you can't post it.

 

If posting use this method

 

Dx100 – Instructions on uploading pdfs

 

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets

as a picture file

remove all pers info inc barcodes etc using paint

but leave all figures and dates.

go to one of the many free online pdf converter websites

convert the image to pdf format.

or ir you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

NB:you can set where it goes in the post by hitting insert inline.

the hit reply button

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm........

 

only £280 for a PPI reclaim?

 

me dont think that is correct!

 

what was the debt/account?

and when did he take it out?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi it was for electrical goods taken out from a superstore about 7 years ago and the total amount was £900 approx.

 

The letter he received from Lowells states,

 

"Statement of Account, This Notice is being given to you as required by the Consumer Credit Act because you fell behind with your payments etc etc."

 

Goes on to give statement date and amount outstanding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...