Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI Expert Help - Can the bank insist on giving my money to a third party ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4478 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I am new, but I followed all of consumer action's advice on reclaiming PPI.

 

The bank upheld my claim and awarded me just under £10k this week for missold PPI I am disabled with Parkinsons disease.

 

The policy was added to the loan without me knowing

I was paying a loan at extorionate interest for many many years.

 

boy was I pleased to hear this I just sat and cried I never believed someone like me could get their money back......

I can only thank consumer action for this help.

This money would make a huge difference to me.

 

But then the bitter blow what someone gives with one hand they take back with another.

 

I took out at loan in 2000, the loan and the PPI was missold to me.

I am disabled with Parkinsons disease,

I suffer greatly,

I only rely on my pension money and the loan was sold to me as a business loan I have not got a business,

and there are lots of issues why the loan is wrong

I am negotiating with the bank to have the loan interest changed and the terms of the loan put back to what they should have been.

 

If it is upheld the loan would have in effect been paid of years ago.

 

The loan is in dispute and the bank set a credit collection agency on me,

but when I replied and told them that I wished to dispute it and provided proof that I would defend the action,

the Credit Collection agency looked at my case and declined to take it any further and referred it back to the bank.

 

I spoke to the Ombudsman and they wrote to the Bank notifying them to look into my loan complaint.

The bank were told to deal with my complaint by the ombudsman.

 

Instead what the bank are proposing is to take my PPI claim money and offset it against the loan and their costs and give it to the collection agency.

 

They have said I have 6 weeks to agree for my money to go to a collections agency.

 

The debt still remains in dispute and the bank have failed to look into the loan dispute.

 

I am arguing that the PPI was obtained illegally and remains my money and the PPI insurance and the loan are two legally different things. I have said whilst the loan remains in dispute I want my money repaid to me. Notwithstanding that there is tax to pay on this amount of money.

 

I know the law said that the banks must return the money to the individual if the policy was missold. Can they do as they see fit with an individuals money? Can they take it and just send it to whoever they want. I note that they have sent me a consent form but I have said no to signing it. I am not avoiding paying my debts but I want to have my complaint looked at properly and the loan dispute settled not for one branch of HSBC to pay it out and then settle a dispute to their satisfaction.

 

Any thoughts would be so greatly appreciated. Any Laws I could quote for them to repay my money to me.

 

 

Thank you first post I have ever done so thank you for reading my post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the bank still OWN the debt - they can.

 

check your credit file to see who owns it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for your kind reply.

 

Its owned by Metropolitan Collection Services, who are owned by HSBC but effectively I cannot pay the loan to HSBC anymore as they say it has been passed to a third party collection agency, and also hence the Consent order for me to agree for the money to be given to them. So not sure about this point.

 

Secondly, the £10k is subject to tax, HSBC say in their letter that this money may be subject to tax and I should keep a copy to enclose with my tax return........ can the bank just use all the money when technically its not all theirs to use ie its gross and there is tax to come off of this amount . Ie if the cheque came to me, I would have to pay the tax on it and then theoretically use the remainder to pay the loan. So are they not just taking my money in full and doing as they see fit with it, when its not all theirs too use ?

 

Thank you so much

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bank are entitled to set-off against any arrears on the account, beyond that the balance is due to you. Tax is recoverable on the 8% simple interest portion of the settlement only.

 

Did they supply you with a breakdown of premium refund, C.I/restitutional interest & simple interest?

 

And most importantly, are you satisfied that the figures are accurate?

 

Gez

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly, Metropolitan are the collection arm of HSBC, so the account is still in effect owned by HSBC and yes.. they can offset against any outstanding balance.

 

IMHO, if they are going to use it to offset, I dont see why you should pay any bliddy tax either.. !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...