Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Quick Quid legal status


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4421 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I read this post with interest

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?324448-Contact-and-company-info

 

The "green lanes" address on the website is actually just a virtual office

 

http://www.prime-secretarial.co.uk/prices.html

 

I'm wondering if Quick Quid or it's parent would actually be able to sue someone in a UK county court, being an American company?

 

Also who is the actual agreement between?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

course they can. Lots of businesses has virutal addresses. The company i work for, has our address for mailin, but infact the mil gets diverted somewhere else. it gets scanned onto our computers, and we ction the letters from there scanned versions. i imagine any letters to QQ are the same.... get scanned, then actioned in the US.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I have been hearing in a few places that QuickQuid is not registered/compliant in the UK properly, and cannot go to Court, or if they tried, then the debtor would have enough of a defence to get it thrown out, due to their dodgy status, can anyone confirm this?

 

I believe one of the early payday loan companys from about 7 years ago, it turned out their debts were unenforcable in the UK for similar reasons - based in Gibralter or somewhere.

 

As an example, I think PayPal have "virtual offices" in the UK, but afaik, its impossible for UK Citizens to sue them, as they are based in Luxumbourg - they specifically moved there to avoid UK regulation and consumer rights. So I can see how this would work in reverse.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe it was PoundstilPayday who were operating from Malta, not Gibraltar who fell foul of the UK authortities.

 

What you need to do about QQ is to complain to the US state they are apparently based in, via the local governor there, they do not want 'dirty money' on their hands and they have far more legislative powers against these predatory lenders.

 

Mention that this company 'outsource' their staff and have home based telephone people dealing with issues - I suspect many of these 'staff' are paid on a commission basis and often do not declare their pitiful earnings, if they do eventually get paid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope, a completely different company and different parent company, unconnected to Quick Quid. Already established on this forum.

 

Don't confuse companies together who do not operate together.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...