Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HSBC playing hard ball


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4651 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a loan from HSBC/HFC in 2001.

When I applied for PPI to be returned to me I was informed “we have done a "reasonable" search, but cannot locate the document” - in other words tough luck!

I set about looking through my own documents and found the date I had the loan, how much it was for, monthly payments, and end of the loan.

 

Could somebody please help me to work out how much I should be asking back for PPI/interest given the figures below?

 

Here are the details:

 

  • Amount borrowed £1,265.43

  • Interest 29.3%)

  • Monthly payments £63.76

  • Loan start date February 2001, over 36 months (I hold bank statements of payments made)

  • Loan ended 16 August 2004 with a final payment of £820.19 (Bank Statements held)

I requested refund in June 2010; the 6 year period did not expire until 16 August 2010

 

So the situation is, I still have not received the document I requested and am entitled to by law.

 

I then wrote to them again and said:

 

If you do not hold Data for a period longer than 6 years I would also request confirmation of this in writing along with your methods used for disposal of such information to comply with the Data Protection Act, stating the name and contact information of your registered Data Controller and Code Compliance Officer.

 

Needless to say they did not reply and it is now over a year since my request, any ideas what my next move should be as regards ignoring my request of document, initially they only had (40) days to produce it.?

Any help is gratefully received

 

Many Thanks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by Pisces01

Pisces

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, HSBC will not divulge that information to me. I asked them to work it out as it is their business and it would be a simple task for them to sort out, but they are sticking with "unable to locate douments".

 

I collected my own info from past letters, best I can come up with, but all the information is there, so I am thinking if I could provide them with an amount to refund me, they could either accept that or arrive at their own sum.

 

There was definately PPI added as I had 2 loans (both with PPI) but cannot find the credit agreement, so asked them for it and now they are stonewalling.

 

Funny, they came up with a date my loan ended. How could they state a date without the document.

My guess is, they wont admit they have it now cos they dont want to return whats owing to me.

 

At the very least I should be able to sue them for not producing the document within the legal time frame, is this correct?

 

Failure to comply with a disclosure request under the data protection act is an offence.

 

 

Thanks

Edited by Pisces01

Pisces

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Yes, I did that (SAR)and they returned my postal order twice.

 

I accept that you are unable to work out how much refund I should have, but given the information I have provided HSBC they should be able to work it out, would you agree?

Pisces

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

If they have the documentation of course they can. And if they have the docs they should of course have supplied them to you followign your SAR.

 

I think you have three courses of action open to you...

 

1 Pass the whole ppi claim thing over to fos deal with.

 

2 Push HSBC further by writing a formal complaint and going through their complaints procedure, copying in the CEO.

 

3 Prepare to sue them for non compliance under the Data Protection Act but there is no guarantee of success as if they don't have the docs then they don't have them.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...