Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Monument - Unfair charges & contact details


Red Eric
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4727 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I'm a newbie on here, so apologies if this has been covered in another thread.

 

Unfortunately my father passed away recently, leaving behind some debt. One Credit Card was with Monument with approximately £3000 still owing. According to recent statements he was being charged monthly charges (interest plus a payment break plan) which was actually more than his monthly direct debit, so the debt has been increasing over time.

 

I have noted on several statements that Payment Protection Insurance (seems to appear every 3 years in the month of March - however the latest payment, dated 2010 was credited back) has been added.

 

I am really unsure how to deal with this (as Executor of his Will). Do Payment Break Plans not normally result in interest being frozen? Can I expect the debt to be cleared due to the PPI element?

 

I have tried contacting the Monument Customer Services team on the 0800 number, but have found that they are non-English speaking, completely useless & want everything in writing. I need to discuss the PPI element with them, but they are unwilling to discuss this on the phone!

 

Therefore, I have written to "Customer Services" (I use this term very loosely!) to advise of my father's death, enclosing a copy of his Death Certificate & a copy of his will. I advised that I understood that the debt could be wiped out due to the PPI element, but have recently received a letter advising of the balance outstanding, with no mention of PPI at all! I guess my father may have cancelled the PPI in 2010, but can find no correspondence to confirm this. If I can't clear the debt can I claim for mis-sold PPI? Also, can I claim for unfair account charges?

 

Hope anyone can help...?

 

Many thanks in advance!

 

Eric

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks! Will go down that route...

 

Was also hoping to contact them to discuss this, but looks like I'll hit a brick wall...

 

Does anyone know if interest should still be charged if a Payment Break plan is in place?

Link to post
Share on other sites

been there done that too..

 

 

add up what you see labelled as any 'fees'

and any payments to the PBP [they will swear its NOT PPI but it IS]

 

use this:

 

to work things out

just put in the date reason and charge

the spreadsheet will do the rest

 

you can safely for this 'exercise' putthem all in one sheet for now.

 

once you've done this

 

look at the total

 

if its anywhere near what is outstandign then comeback here

 

you owe nowt and they wont go near a court or the estate.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...