Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

M&S Personal Reserve


NotGotAClue
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4682 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I hope this is the right forum for the Personal Reserve account also if not please will someone point me to the correct one?

 

I sent a CCA request to M&S on 23/05 (with proof of posting that day also). It was delivered on 25/05 according to Post Office Track & Trace. M&S sent a reply which was dated 08/06 but the postmark is 10/06 at 07:38AM and was delivered to me on 11/06.

 

Before I scan the document and post it up (it is only an application and not an agreeement as far as I can tell) can someone please verify whether the dates between me sending it and getting it back are within the required timeframe bearing in mind the bank holiday inbetween? If it is not within the 12(?) working days what should I do now?

 

Depending on whether they have complied with the timeframes, I may also have a question about validity of their reply and also PPI reclaim.

 

Thank you for being gentle with a newbie:oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

My opinion is you got what you requested...may have been a bit late but there you go.

 

What is the nature of your queries please?

 

Ims

 

PS Welcome to CAG

Edited by ims21

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi IMS and thank you for the welcome:-) Sorry for not being clearer in my original question, hope I can clarify.

 

The main query was "is their reply within the statutory time limit for replying based on the above dates?". If it is not, then the secondary query is "what is the impact of this?" as I believe (but do need confirmation) that they then cannot enforce the agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Please accept my apologies for the slow response - my router died and I had to wait until today to get a replacement :sad:

 

Thank you, I understand where I was going wrong now! I'm trying to catch up with mails now but later will post up another question about their reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, now that I'm back online, please will someone look at the attached and tell me if M&S have met their obligations and suggest what I do next? Is the fact that it's an application and not an agreement as far as I can tell of any relevance as I think there have been some changes in this area?

 

The poor quality of the terms and conditions is not from my scanner, many of the documents they sent to me were virtually unreadable.

 

Many thanks for your assistance.

M&S CCA response - anonymous.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi NGAC

 

May I ask where this query is going? I mean what is the ultimate goal?

 

You mention in your first post a ppi reclaim?

 

Can you give the full story as you are likely to get far more replies if you can paint the full picture for the Caggers.

 

Many thanks

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi IMS, of course you can ask:-) Like many on here a combination of circumstances has led me unable to meet my outgoings. As an alternative to bankruptcy - which is very, very close and would leave the lenders getting virtually nothing - I would like to negotiate a lower settlement figure. Based on some discussions I had previously had (including on one occasion me asking to hold off talking to them for 2 weeks as my father passed away that morning and I had his funeral to organise and their reply suggesting that I ask friends and relatives at the funeral for money to pay the loan:-x) I realised that negotiating from a position of weakness will get me nowhere.

 

So my ultimate goal is to pay a much lower full & final settlement. To get to this point I need to move the negotiating strength from them to me. It's how I get to that point that I have NotGotAClue and where I need as much assistance as possible!

 

I figured that if I can get to the stage where they believe they will not get anything (either from an invalid CCA or some other method that the gurus suggest) and then even worse for them they think they may have to pay out on a PPI claim that they may be willing to negotiate. Please understand that I do not expect to get my debt written off (although that would be nice), nor do I deny incurring the debt. I just want to be able to negotiate on fair terms with them.

 

Hope that answers your question but please fire away if you need more information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi NGAC

 

Excellent, thank you for that. Hope you didn't mind me asking. This gives a complete picture and some of the more experenced Caggers will now, I'm sure, give some input on the matter of getting to the position of strength.

 

It seems to me that if you launch a ppi reclaim it does give you an instant defence and potentially high value bargaining chip. I'd certainly be investigating this.

 

Have you looked at the PDFs on the fos website as there is a wealth of information there as well as the threads on CAG.

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you IMS, I look forward to as much assistance as anyone is able to provide! I hadn't even begun to look at the PPI claim yet but I'll start that soon and also search for the PDFs on the FOS website. I almost want to save the PPI until after I've almost finalised a settlement, as a method to hopefully further reduce the settlement value. However, your advice especially as regards complexity and timescales will certainly come in handy once I've researched that side.

 

The one problem I have found with this forum is the huge quantity of excellent advice and guidance, leaves my brain frazzled:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The one problem I have found with this forum is the huge quantity of excellent advice and guidance, leaves my brain frazzled:-D

 

Hi

 

Yes it is a bit daunting to start with but you'll soon get the hang of it.

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

My apologies for disappearing for a while again.

 

 

In the interim, repossession proceedings have escalated on the house and my wife has been diagnosed in the last 3 weeks with cancer

- come on world I'm sure you can find something else to throw at us grrrrr.

 

please will someone have a look at the previous documents and advise whether the CCA reply is valid?

 

 

At the same time I will be reading up on the PPI section as advised by ims and following that route in parallel.

 

NGAC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi NGAC

 

I think it wise to accept that they have complied with your request. Things have changed regarding the precise nature of docs returned under a cca request and whether a creditor can issue proceedings on what once would have been deemed incorrect paperwork.

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's not an Agreement; it's an Application. It says so on the top.... I've had one similar and M&S (via their DCA) backed off when sent an additional request under CPUTR. Not heard anything for a approx. a year.

 

You'll have to read the CPUTR thread to understand this.... please don't ask me..... lol!

 

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi NGAC

 

I think it wise to accept that they have complied with your request. Things have changed regarding the precise nature of docs returned under a cca request and whether a creditor can issue proceedings on what once would have been deemed incorrect paperwork.

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Thank you ims.

I'll go with your advice and try and make some time to read up on the PPI still.

 

 

For my own education I see a few people have referred to the changes but can't find any specific details.

 

 

don't perhaps have a link do you as I'm useless with my search terms?

 

Thank you again

NGAC

 

That's not an Agreement; it's an Application. It says so on the top.... I've had one similar and M&S (via their DCA) backed off when sent an additional request under CPUTR. Not heard anything for a approx. a year.

 

You'll have to read the CPUTR thread to understand this.... please don't ask me..... lol!

 

:-)

 

Thank you, I always want to learn more so off to the CPUTR thread to get even further confused :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...