Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Citifinancial (ex-Associates) & Hillesden Securities (aka DLC)


arthur256
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4315 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My Associates card account was sold to Hillesden in about 2005 after I was in hospital for six months and my income stopped unexpectedly.

 

When interest was frozen (04/2005) the balance was £1307, in 02/2006 it was £1013, in 10/2006 supposedly £1429! There is something seriously amiss with the figures as I was then paying nearly £30/month. They appear to have added nearly £600 and can't or won't say why!

 

Eventually they applied for a CCJ, which I did not oppose other than to confirm I could continue to pay £30pm, but not more - which the Court then confirmed.

 

This was later revised by mutual agreement to £10pm because my limited income fell again.

 

I have therefore already paid off a significant part of the original sum, but they have never sent a statement showing the payments and decreasing balance.

 

I requested a copy regulated Consumer Credit Agreement in October 2008. I understand it should be supplied within 12 working days, but have not sent it after over two years. They did say it "would follow" but it never did.

 

I also asked for a statement of the account - from April 2005 (when the balance was £1307) to date. This would identify the discrepancies, but Hillesden have not supplied anything to explain the inflated figures, so I suspended payments.

 

They are unable to enforce the missing agreement, being in breach of the Act, and will not justify their amount by a proper statement. Without any explanation, the balance appears to have been artificially inflated.

 

They just issued an Annual Statement of Account, which does not attempt to show the way the balance is arrived at! All it shows is an unchanged figure of £873 from 06/2009 TO 12/2010. I reckon the balance should be little more than £200, probably less if it includes unlawful extras prior to the sale of the debt.

 

In view of this extremely irregular handling of my debt by Hillesden, I was advised to request that the Judgment be set aside or struck out. I am writing to the Court (Northampton - who deal with the online service), asking for guidance on how to get it sorted out.

 

Has anybody else had this particular problem with Hillesden, and with what outcome? I have looked in the forum, and they seem almost as "sharp" as Link Financial, though in a different way.

 

TIA

 

Arthur

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...