Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MBNA PPI Query


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4077 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

you might well have to 'guestimate' what you paid in ppi in the years prior to what statements you have/are likely to get.

 

do you have the original agreement par chance?

 

and when was YOUR last financial transaction [in/out] on the dard?

 

i would not worry too much about the DCA, there's little they can do to you & would have brought the debt for 3p/£ so's it wont be worth their while once they catch wind of the PPI reclaim.

 

pers i'd ignore them.

 

nothing to stop you sending a letter to wind them up though...

 

something along the lines of

 

you are claiming there is £XXX outstanding , currently i'm looking to reclaim £XXX PPI so the A/C is in dispute anyhow.bye bye any debt you are currently trying to fleece me for.........

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 219
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

didn't know you'ed sent a cca...have we seen it?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the info so far :D

 

While I'm waiting for MBNA to respond to my request for the full 14+ years of PPI I've paid I've been looking at the calcutators in the stickies on here. I can see how they work fine and the single figure I put in as a test turned a £46 PPI payment into nearly £150 over 4.5 years. I worked this out using an interest rate of 18% which was plucked out of the air to be fair. I'm just wondering how I should find out these rates as I have nothing in my SAR that mentions rates charged over the time of the card although I realise the 8% added at the end is fixed?

 

yea that going to be your difficulty is 'guestimating the int they charged you on the years you don't have statements for.

as for the 8%

i would pers refrain from adding that until/if you move to the court stage.

When I do get my figures I can see it's going to take me a month of sundays to type it all in and add it all up but I'm kind of looking forwards to it :D

 

you should be in for a tidy sum.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

either look in the MBNA forum for info of int rates for those years you need

or start a new thread there asking if people have that info.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'd p'haps add to or change the last line to read.

 

should there be an outstanding balance remaining.

 

that'll wind 'em up

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sold before the rectify date - thats typical for mbna.

and they've got the 14 days correct too...thats rare!

 

now, what figure is mentioned on the dn that you must pay before the 25th....

 

full bal or arrears...

 

it wont matter much to the ppi reclaim as they can only off-set arrears anyhow/eitherway

 

dx

 

oh and PS MBNA dont do termination letters

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no thats ok they've just asked for arrears

 

very rare for that from MBNA

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i believe that is correct

 

there are a few MBNA threads here the same

have a read.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you cannot have two dn's for the same 'default'

if nowt has changed since the issue of the first invalid one, they cannot issue a second.

 

there are lots of good threads on your situation, pretty typical

 

dx

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you get a letter demanding the full amount [not just arrears] then you are only liable for the arrears. [but in your case they haven't so no dice]

as for DN, again, you cannot have two for the same default, even if one is 'invalid'.

 

with the ppi issue, they have 8 weeks,

unless you know otherwise that the info exists, i doubt you'll get it as its past 6yrs?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are not a mecenary.

its money you have been fleeced of unlawfully.

 

now, so if you are relying on your orig SAR, then they objectively, have only 40 calendar day from the date you sent the SAR to comply to it.

did you send the failure to comply letter or just one of your own?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

cal

 

you are being too kind

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

na thats not right.

 

is the £76.80 what you paid each month?

 

if it is then use this at 8%

 

http://www.egalegal.com/compoundWindow.html

 

rests = 12

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sri yes i was thinking this was another ppi claim.

 

so's its a credit card and you paid on av £75 PCM PPI dating back to 1994

and you've av the int rate too? that they charged you?

 

also didn't realise the card was £15k! that a hell of a balance for a card. esp from MBNA

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

£75@17.9% on 19/11/94 till 10/11/10 =

int = £1209.22

tot = £1284.22

using this int calc...

 

http://www.egalegal.com/compoundWindow.html

 

rests = 12

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Claiming Interest

 

What interest can I claim?

If you are claiming unlawful charges from a bank, credit card company or finance company or claiming back PPI payments, you can claim back the interest they have levied on the charges you are reclaiming.

You can also claim interest specified under s69 of the County Courts Act 1984 calculated as simple interest at 8% per annum (0.022%/day) on all the charges and interest levied on those charges from the date of the charge until the date of (court) judgement or earlier settlement. You can only claim this interest when you file a claim in court.

Instead of s69 interest, some people are claiming interest in restitution for the ‘unjust enrichment’ of the bank, credit card company or finance company. The argument is that the bank has used my money to lend to other people at interest and therefore made a profit for the bank. In order to put things back as they would have been had the bank not used my money in this way (restitution), that profit ought to be taken off them. This profit is calculated as compound interest at the bank’s normal interest rate on all the charges and interest levied on those charges from the date of the charge until the date of (court) judgement or earlier settlement. Interest for restitution is supported by case law (Sempra Metals) - you can read a summary of the case in the [Times.]

What interest can I not claim?

You cannot claim overdraft interest on ‘legitimate’ overdrafts, that is, on that portion of overdrafts not made up of unlawful charges. Similarly you cannot claim back interest on purchases made with a credit card, nor the interest charged on a fixed-sum loan.

[edit]

Estimating interest charged

 

You can claim back the interest you have had levied on the charges you are reclaiming. The problem is that you can only calculate this exactly if you have access to every transaction on your account and to the software the bank use to calculate the interest. Obviously, we get all the transactions from the bank or credit card statements sent in response to a Subject Access Request. However, there is no way of obtaining exact information on how the bank calculates interest charges. Therefore, we need a method of estimating this interest.

 

PPI on loan agreements

This is actually the easiest to calculate. On a properly executed agreement you will find the following information: • PPI charges • APR Calculate the number of years since the agreement came into force. This can be years and parts of year expressed as a decimal (eg 2 years and 145 days is 2+(145/365) = 2.397 years) – call this ‘y’, say.

Interest on the PPI is then

PPI * (1 + APR)^y – PPI

(Remember to express the APR as a decimal – 26% should go in the equation as 0.26)

Current Accounts

Most banks use a complicated method of charging overdraft interest based on a daily rate applied to the daily balance with the interest charge added up and charged at the end of the month. There is no interest charge if the account is in credit or if the balance is above any agreed free overdraft limit.

The simplest way of estimating the interest on charges is to keep a running total of charges and then multiply each interest charge on the statement by the proportion of the balance attributable to charges at the interest date:

Interest on charges = Total charges to date/Account balance * interest charge.

Having done this for each interest charge on the statements, add them up to get the total interest charged on the bank charges being reclaimed. This method is the one used in the Advanced Spreadsheets in the Bank Templates Library. Remember that an overdraft balance is negative.

Credit Cards

The method used by credit card companies to add interest is very similar to the method used by banks for calculating the interest on overdrafts. The same Advanced Spreadsheet can be used as for Current Account charges. Alternatively, you can use this simpler spreadsheet. Again, remember that the credit card balance is negative.

Check

Some people are very surprised when they first calculate the interest on charges for their claim as it seems too big. This is because compound interest mounts up very quickly. As a simple ‘sanity check’ you can apply the following:

At 14% APR a debt doubles roughly every 5 years

At 19% APR a debt doubles roughly every 4 years

At 26% APR a debt doubles roughly every 3 years

At 32% APR a debt doubles roughly every 30 months

At 40% APR a debt doubles roughly every 2 years

 

See the original thread here for a tutorial on how to calclate interest using the Advanced Spreadsheets

 

*****************************

 

 

 

pers i'd claim up to today as they have gained from your loss

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

put your sheet on that thread

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 57 ?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

yep i refer to those earllier.

 

il see if i can find some time tomoorow to loook at your xls

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

very busy today sorry

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers i'd delete all about the 5th arrow point

 

forget it.

 

 

as for the spreadsheet.

 

taking the first charge of 1994 that now = £1302!

dont know how you've done that sheet

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as post 56

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

cant see the logic behind that.

 

if you had a bal from month one

you must of had PPI.

 

whats their PPI calc on the t&c etc

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so typicaly what is their PPI level then?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you are telling me you only spent £200 in the 1st month?

 

doubt it.....

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...