Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

'Extinguished'- the debt itself or the legal obligation to pay?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5224 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My understanding of the word 'extinguished' in Scottish law regarding debts 5 yrs old or more is that it is the legal obligation to pay which becomes non-existent, rather than the actual debt itself. What I mean is, although you no longer have to pay the debt and nobody can legally compel you to, the debt is still in existence assuming you did actually borrow the money at some point and not repay it.

 

Is my understanding correct? Or are all my unsecured debts (over 7 yrs old with no acknowledgement/payment from me or court action taken by creditors during this time) actually non-existent? Do DCAs have the right to hold information about my old debts and sell it on even if they know perfectly well it is statute barred?

Edited by vincentcalhoun
adding information
Link to post
Share on other sites

Good question vincentcalhoun. My understanding is the same as yours. A debt may well be statute barred after 5 years but it would not prevent a lender recording adverse credit history against you. Typically this would be for internal purposes and probably has no time limitation. I dare say this is no different for you or I. “remember that £5 I loaned Jimmy when we were on a night out in 1975? Well he never repaid it so I’ll never lend to him again” That said I also understand that anything placed on your credit file is removed after 6 years. Now what I do not know if this 6 year status is wrongly quoted using English Statute because as you quite rightly say in Scotland it is only 5 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, you'd think us tight gits up in Scotland would make it about 30 yrs to recover a debt, considering our stingy reputation hehe.

 

I think you're right, all my original creditors probably do have some internal record of me, and that's fair enough, it's just the DCAs selling my information back and forth that concerns me, as I could still have to be writing statute barred template letters into my old age!

 

My credit report had some defaults on it, although that was in Autumn 2008, when I checked back around 7 months later it was clean as a whistle, that was because the 6 year limit had been fulfilled. The limit for adverse credit history on your report is 6 yrs in Scotland and England, it's just the Scottish are a wee bit luckier in only having a 5 yr limit on their debts :D

 

I just wish I knew how to get these people to stop passing on my info. If it turns out my understanding has been wrong, and it is my debts which are truely 'extinguished' and non-existent, rather than my legal obligation to pay them, then I think DCAs cant have any right to keep selling my personal information to companies which they know will harrass me illegally. I wish I could get clarification on this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thinking out the box for a moment, but surely you can stop a DCA in their tracks by advising then of yor familiarity with Office of Fair Trading's Guidance on debt collection such as ceasing collection activity on an unrecoverable, reasonably queried or disputed debt.

 

By raising a dispute over the matter they would have to cease action and knowing it was irrecoverable could do nothing more. As such any action will undoubtedly be construed as deceptive and unfair methods which would allow you to register a formal complaint. This could put in jeopardy their consumer credit licence and with it their ability to function.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...