Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

NEXT Directory - response to CCA request


bradfordlad
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4739 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

as you may know, I have several issues at the moment with various creditors.

 

Anyway, a couple of months ago, I wrote to Next to ask for a copy of my original agreement. Nothing fancy, just a nice request. I got a letter back with a copy of a blank "Consumer Credit Agreement".

 

I did a formal CCA request a couple of weeks ago, and I've (hopefully) linked to their response below.

 

Would anyone be so kind as to have a look and share their thoughts?

 

I don't think it takes a genius to see that its rubbish, but wonder what my options are regarding future payments.

 

For the record, I had to request reduced payments unitl further notice due to major changes in personal circumstances. Interestingly, while all my other creditors kicked up a stink, Next just said "YES!" and are happily accepting a much lower payment, with no interest being charged.

 

Anyway - here's my letters:

 

Response: http://i777.photobucket.com/albums/yy57/citygent1911/Next1.gif

 

Supposed CCA: http://i777.photobucket.com/albums/yy57/citygent1911/Next2.gif

 

Thanks in advance.

 

BL

Well 6 years on and most of the defaults have disappeared, thank you CAG for a

ll your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

So should I stop paying them altogther? They have been quite reasonable with me - thats what makes me think they've got no paperwork!!

 

Should I ask to see the agreement bearing my signature?

Well 6 years on and most of the defaults have disappeared, thank you CAG for a

ll your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 6 months later...

Hi everyone - bit of an update...

 

Been ignoring Next for a few months, as they keep sending the same "True Copy" of an agreement so not been ars*d to waste a stamp on them.

 

Had a letter recently from Moorcroft Debt Collections - requesting payment of the full outstanding balance.

 

As far as I can see, I havn't received a Default Notice from Next, so is this classed as unlawful rescission? If so, I might just tell Moorcroft to shove it :) Has anyone else heard of Next terminating without a DN?

 

Thanks in advance - BL

Well 6 years on and most of the defaults have disappeared, thank you CAG for a

ll your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

I had an account with Next, for which they withdrew the credit facility last year. I had not missed a payment on the account since it was opened around six years ago. Apparently, they review credit files on a regular basis and decide to remove the facility. as they did this, I stopped paying them and they have defaulted the account, I have been getting letters and calls from Debt Manager LTD, yesterday I got a letter from them with a load of old statements and a completely blank agreement!!

 

So I would say that unlawful recission is quite commonplace with Next.

Vodafone - Default removed (07/01/07).

MBNA - Claim settled with contractual interest and adjusted credit file to show no late payments (12/02/07).

CABOT - Taken to Court by Cabot/Morgan over alleged credit card debt, case dismissed (06/12/10).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...