Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CCA return for M+S loan - look enforceable?


Clinging_2da_wreckage
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5250 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Caggers.

 

Please could any kind person take a butchers at the linked CCA request response and give me some advice?

 

I think it looks the real deal and the signatures look ok. Sigh!

 

Any help very much appreciated

 

Thanks

 

 

http://i793.photobucket.com/albums/yy218/quiggers76534/MS%20CCA/MSLoan1a.jpg

 

http://i793.photobucket.com/albums/yy218/quiggers76534/MS%20CCA/MSLoan2a.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does look enforceable to me, all the prescribed terms seem to be there. Given the quality of the document though, it's quite possible that all they have is a microfiche copy, and not the original signed document.

 

Did you receive a default and termination notice? If so, post those up as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Huff&Puff

 

Thanks for your response.

 

Trawling through my files I doesn't appear that I recieved an official default and termination notice.

 

Just a threatogram from a DCR informing me my account was overdue and they had been instructed to recover the amount owed.

 

Is a microfiche copy not enforcable then?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can produce a microfiche in court BUT they must also produce a technical expert who has knowledge of the data base the microfiche was stored in and can state in court that the microfiche was not tampered with in the processing. They are highly unlikely to be able to do that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Microfiche is a form of film. It is normally stored in things like filing cabinets, boxes, etc. but not in a database.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, never ask for anything. You can use the lack of compliance as a defence if they ever took you to court.

 

How do you want to play this? If you feel obliged to pay them something, just write back and say that £1 a month is all you will pay, and they can take it or leave it. Or you could just ignore them for the moment and see where they go with it. I suspect it will just be empty threatograms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone checked these figures through a loan calculator? I have and it appears the APR is wrong. The calculator I have used shows that the repayments should be £115.47 per month not as shown £116.75 with an APR 6.9%. Can someone else check as it would question enforceability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone checked these figures through a loan calculator? I have and it appears the APR is wrong. The calculator I have used shows that the repayments should be £115.47 per month not as shown £116.75 with an APR 6.9%. Can someone else check as it would question enforceability
.

 

It would seem that there is a deferred period at the front end which could account for it, (loan period 88 months? - number of payments 84)

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Palomino,surprise and cashins, thank you for your contributions.

 

Understood Huff&Puff.

 

We have been paying £5 a month for a few months now so it might be hard to reduce it? I am thinking maybe I should continue as is and if they start to try and up the ante maybe I will try the hardball approach.

 

Maybe that sounds lame but £5 a month could be a small price to pay to avoid the all the stress.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not at all, if you're happy with that arrangement, then there's nothing wrong with not rocking the boat. Be aware though, that we never see a DCA that doesn't get greedy sooner or later, so they'll be back eventually, wanting to up your repayments :(

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...