Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Quick quid at 2,356 per cent **


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5207 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I can't believe that a company like Quick quid are allowed to advertise on day time telly where those more likely to respond are those on low income, eg single parents and those on other low incomes. How do they get to there APR of 2356 ?

 

 

 

 

I Don't think they should be allowed to advertise on day time telly, at the rates they do. What do others think ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

from their website

 

Terms and Conditions apply. Finance charge will be between £10 and £14.75 per £50 borrowed. Typical 2356% APR. †Loan amounts are based on consumer's credit history and ability to repay loan. Not everyone may qualify for £1500 ‡QuickQuid performs traditional credit checks, while still accepting those with less-than-perfect credit. QuickQuid verifies applicant information via various national databases. §Funds will be deposited the same working day, if approved by 14:30. ¶Approval may take up to 30 minutes in most cases. Payday advances should be used for short-term financial needs only, not as a long-term financial solution. Customers with credit difficulties should seek credit counselling.

 

The maximum interest charged for say a £100 SHORT TERM loan is £29.50.

 

I don't see nothing wrong with that. It's when people use it as a long term solution they fall into a mess.

 

Or have I got this completely wrong?

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with ConsumerDude, the daytime advert is as bad as Wonga's 'App to Lend', you very quickly have to take out another loan to keep enough money to pay the loan and the interest back each month...

 

If it is such a short term loan then why not pay it back over 3 months instead of one, that way there would be less reason to borrow more to cover the larger shortfall - and make all these companies abandon the APR comparison (did you know there are about 15 ways to calculate APR...) and use XXX for every £50 borrowed as a comparison.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with ConsumerDude, the daytime advert is as bad as Wonga's 'App to Lend', you very quickly have to take out another loan to keep enough money to pay the loan and the interest back each month...

 

If it is such a short term loan then why not pay it back over 3 months instead of one, that way there would be less reason to borrow more to cover the larger shortfall - and make all these companies abandon the APR comparison (did you know there are about 15 ways to calculate APR...) and use XXX for every £50 borrowed as a comparison.

 

 

 

Thank you for that. Somethings are just wrong and this is one of them..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand what you mean, but people do have a freedom of choice.

for FAQs & Step By Step

click here

for Templates Library

click here

for Court Bundle

click here

________________

 

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Halifax C C

here

WON 121o121 'vs' Cahoot CC

here

WON 121o121 'vs' LloydsTSB (again)

here

 

________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately in the financial world they do not, when a bailiff comes knocking because you have missed a council tax payment and trebles the debt some people dont have the skills and internet access to demand the council take the debt back due to their circumstances.... so turn to the likes of these companies.

 

The credit crunch is now affecting all these sharks and hopefully none will survive more than another financial year.

 

I understand what you mean, but people do have a freedom of choice.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...