Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

CCA APPLICATION Form.


pabrmu
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5210 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

Applied for CCA on 16/10/09 and received the usual letter asking for signature and a further letter to sign and return to them:

http://i343.photobucket.com/albums/o473/pabrmu/MS2.jpg

It is interesting to note that they say in the last paragraph " I wish to apply for a copy of my M&S Credit Card application form........"

I have drafted the following reply:

http://i343.photobucket.com/albums/o473/pabrmu/MS3-1.jpg

I have no doubt that they will continue to prevaricate, so I intend sending them one further letter to the effect that as they have not sent a properly executed CCA, I consider the matter to be in dispute and will not continue any further dialogue or payments until they comply.

Any comments, you good,good people.

Pat.

Edited by ErikaPNP
pm sent to member
Link to post
Share on other sites

Your good at writing letters....should I ever need anything doing I know where to come ;):)

 

I take it as the 28th October is only a few days away & with more postal strikes planned (3 days next wk?) no sooner have you posted the above letter, hot on its tracks no doubt will be the In Dispute Letter.....to them!!

 

I must admit though like you it weird them asking this on a CCA! The only thing I had a letter back requesting a signature like this was on my SAR request with MBNA tho where they even sent the postal order back too :mad:(stalling tactics!), I had some postings on my thread at the time saying I didnt need to provide it nor should I have needed to send a proof of identity either like a driv lic / passport.

 

So in your case you shouldnt have to either, after all like you said they have been dealing with you at this address for correspondence for a long time now so obviously are the person you say you are, it is merely them avoiding fulfilling this legal request!!!

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mydogsawestie,

Thanks for the kind words.

I cant really take any credit for most of the letter writing as most of it has been cribbed from this site!

I don't doubt that my "In Dispute" letter will be winging its way very shortly!

Pat

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck with it, please post when you receive your next reply and/or your next action as i am in the same boat. Received a letter yesterday requiring my signature and i have sent them a reply to the effect that it is not required and after all they have been dealing with me at this address etc for several years.

I do think they are stalling, i tend to think that they may well not have an original agreement which is why they are sending these letters?

 

Your letters from them are identical to mine! :D I will keep an eye out for your response, my letter back to them will be posted tomorrow.

 

All the best

D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

Can one of you clever people help.

When applying for a CCA request, I see that a few companies only ever send the application form, probably because this is all that was ever used to open an account.

I was led to believe that a CCA request was for the actual AGREEMENT form, not the application form.

However, somewhere else on this forum, it has been said that in some circumstances, the application form can be used if all the required info was contained within.

Does anybody know if this is correct?

Pat.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

After a couple of letters, M & S have now sent what they say is the agreement.

Needless to say, it is the application form.

After reading through the form:

 

http://i343.photobucket.com/albums/o473/pabrmu/sc00abac68.jpg

 

perhaps the most telling sentence, and probably the one that gives them away is : ONCE YOU HAVE SIGNED THIS AGREEMENT, YOU WILL HAVE FOR SHORT TIME A RIGHT TO CANCEL IT. EXACT DETAILS OF HOW YOU CAN DO THIS WILL BE SENT TO YOU BY POST BY THE CREDITOR.

Surely, this says that this cannot be an agreement as the actual agreement would have to give the exact clause.

Anyways, I have sent M &S this letter:

 

http://i343.photobucket.com/albums/o473/pabrmu/ms21.jpg

Any views?

Pat

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

As you have said in your letter to them, there are no prescibed terms on what they have sent you. Of course they could be on the reverse of the original piece of paper.

 

In the meantime the account is in dispute since 04/11/2009. So no more payments, no more interest. Of course that won't stop there being lots of telephone calls and other collection activity despite the dispute.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It continues!

They have almost repeated their previous letter to me, so I have again responded.

Can anyone advise what is the liklihood that they would take this to court?

Has anyone else been taken to court on such an obvious application form?

http://i343.photobucket.com/albums/o473/pabrmu/ms40.jpg

http://i343.photobucket.com/albums/o473/pabrmu/ms41.jpg

 

Pat

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems that M&S are very slow to take anyone to court (especially those of us with old Chargecard agreements that they converted to &MORE credit cards). Which doesn't mean that you won't get lots of letters threatening to take you to court, from M&S, Collect Direct (UK) or some of their other DCAs.

 

The end of that latest letter from M&S suggests they they consider they have given you their final response (the reference to referral to the FOS). Did one of their previous letters say it was a final response?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi everyone,

After tons of calls and letters from M&S, this is the latest one:

http://i343.photobucket.com/albums/o473/pabrmu/MS30.jpg.

This was the application in question:

http://i343.photobucket.com/albums/o473/pabrmu/sc00abac68.jpg

 

Even though they state that the application form says: "Credit Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974", the bottom line states "Once you have signed the agreement, you have a short time to cancel it.Exact details of how and when you can do this will be sent to you by post by the creditor".

This would imply to me that these details should have been on the form for it to be an agreement.

I now intend replying yet again with this information.

Can anyone comment on this and more important, can anybody say if M&S have taken anyone to court on an application form?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

what do you expect them to say? We surrender. Not very likely.

The issue is in the covering letter - that they consider it compliant as a single document in more than one piece. But as far as I can see they have only supplied one piece - the application form and if that is all they have they have little chance.

BUT if this did get to court, what they would almost certainly try is to put in a set of T&Cs and try to convince the court that these were the "other piece", that they were contained within the sig document (even if separate) and thus compliant and thus enforceable. Whether the court would agree or not would depend on what they came up with in the way of T&Cs and how convincing they looked

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...