Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Are bank charges subject to VAT?


BankFodder
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4134 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

am very curious to know whether bank charges are subject to VAT?

 

I imagine that if they are just penalties and accurately reflect the losses incurred by the banks when bouncing a DD or bearing an unauthorised overdraft, then they might not be VATable.

 

 

 

However if the charge really is the fee charged by the bank for providing a service - as some of the banks somtimes say - then surely there must be a VAT element included within the charge.

 

If not, then why not. Why would these charges be zero rated?

 

If they are VATable then has anyone received a properly prepared VAT invoice?

 

The point of this question is that If the charges VATable then it is scarcely imaginable that the banks are not paying it. They don't make these kinds of mistakes. On the other hand, maybe stranger things have happened.

 

What interests me is that if the charges are VATable then I would expect that they would be required to issue VAT receipts and at present they don't do this.

 

To require VAT receipts would be a good way of obtaining from any Bank the entire histoory of overdraft and interest charges going back a long way without having to resort to Data Protection or having to pay for bank statements.

 

If the charges are not VATable, could this be that the banks have represented them to C&E as being true penalties? If so then we should be entitled to know about it.

 

If the charges are more than penalties and thereofre contribute to the profit made by the banks then why are the not VATable and surely receipts should be given.

 

 

This thread needs someone knowledgeable about VAT to respond to it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I've just spoken to a friend of mine who recently retired from HMRC and he confirmed that most bank charges are exempt. There are three main classes of transaction for VAT purposes standard rates (17.5% for most things), zero rated (where the item could attract VAT but this is charged at 0%) and exempt which is deemed outside the scope of VAT.

 

A lot of financial transactions are exempt (eg interest on a loan) and bank overdraft and credit card penalty charges fall within this category. The main exception to this general rule are forms of commission based transactions. This means that for example a broker's loan arrangement fee could be vatable but this depend heavily on the terms of the cpmtract.

 

If anyone wants the statutory references for this, please let me know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 years later...

There is no VAT on bank charges as financial services are exempt.

 

A very intersting observation because bailiffs fees are VAT chargeable, but since there is no receipt or invoicing system, or none that is visible to the VAT payer, then it is "scarcely imaginable" that the bailiffs are not paying it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Ok, a liitle late in response but I would like statutory references, please.

 

"and bank overdraft and credit card penalty charges fall within this category"

 

BUT they arent penalty charges, are they? The Supreme Court said so. rolleyes.gif

 

The Banks won the Test Case by convincing the Supreme Court that their charges are a FEE for a SERVICE and that this service is a core to their business bringing in billions every year.

 

Damn right they should be paying VAT and issuing VAT receipts.

 

Its now not a trivial amount like interest on a loan, they state its a definate service they provide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4134 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...