Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Interest calculated wrong on my CCA – What Should i Do Next?


ste997
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5337 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I have recently heard about having loan written off due to varies things wrong with the CCA. I acknowledge I have the dept with intelligence finance on a fixed sum loan agreement and I still have the original customer copy of the loan agreement. Well according to the agreement I had 10,000.00 in cash and a further 3,819.20 for insurance making the total loan amount 13,819.20 at 60 months payment of 268.40 at 5.9% APR with annual interest of 5.95%.

 

Well using various loan interest calculations online using the above details show me that I’m paying £1.88 to much a month resulting in total payment £112.80 to much. I have been looking in to having this sorted out with them but reading various topics on this forum I believe I’m in the right to maybe fight to have this dept wrote off. I’m still paying my monthly installments of 268.40 and haven’t missed any payments since this was taken out on 19th April 2006.

 

What should I do, use the CCA request form and hope they can’t find a signed copy and take it from there or should I get legal advice to fight my corner using my original copy of my CCA to see if my interest has been calculated wrong.

I’m finding it hard to mange finance at the moment as I have just graduated university so any savings will help.

 

Looking forward to your replies

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you saying that you actually HAVE your copy of your agreement ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for getting back to me. Yeah I actually have my original customer copy but like a fool I am, I haven’t signed and dated my copy due to me not having to send it off, but I have learnt from that mistake. Thank you for working me that out and for conforming that it has been calculated wrongly. Where should I go from here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was the first payment made on 19th May 2006 or was it deferred to the 1st of June?

 

If it was deferred,it would bring the monthly payment to within 10p of their figure.

 

 

enamae

Please note: I have no qualifications in this area and any advice offered is given in good faith.

 

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/Ombudsman-news/40/40_setoff.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your first monthly payment (principal) was 20th July 06, three months after the date of the loan (19th Apr 06), that would probably explain why the monthly repayment amount would be higher (because there's more interest to pay). The APR they quoted you may well have been correct.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That would explain why the payments are higher as they are calculated on loan £10,000.00 + Insurance £3,819.20 + 1 months interest £69.10.

 

 

 

 

enamae

Please note: I have no qualifications in this area and any advice offered is given in good faith.

 

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/Ombudsman-news/40/40_setoff.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although the payment amounts appear to be correct, have you looked into the Insurance aspect of the Loan?

 

Was it Payment Protection? If it was, as you were a student, depending whether you were also working,this may have been mis-sold and therefore reclaimable.

 

enamae

Please note: I have no qualifications in this area and any advice offered is given in good faith.

 

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/Ombudsman-news/40/40_setoff.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...