Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HFC BANK - advice needed.


mebuck
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6171 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi.

 

I've just sent my Preliminary Request to retrieve penalties charged to my current account, and now I'm trying to see what else I can claim back.

 

I bought a laptop on hire-purchase (when I was stupid) about 4/5 years ago. Its since been paid off.

 

The final settlement figure was huge; as apparently they added a pile of interest on top of the figure for late payments over the years!

 

During the entire 4 years of the agreement, they never once sent me a statement. Recon I should request them? Am I within my rights to claim back any penalties or interest charged during a hire purchase agreement?

 

I definately know they used to charge me "administration fees" quite a bit.

 

I bought the laptop from Dixons, and HFC Bank provided the loan.

 

Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

I've just sent my Preliminary Request to retrieve penalties charged to my current account, and now I'm trying to see what else I can claim back.

 

I bought a laptop on hire-purchase (when I was stupid) about 4/5 years ago. Its since been paid off.

 

The final settlement figure was huge; as apparently they added a pile of interest on top of the figure for late payments over the years!

 

During the entire 4 years of the agreement, they never once sent me a statement. Recon I should request them? Am I within my rights to claim back any penalties or interest charged during a hire purchase agreement?

 

I definately know they used to charge me "administration fees" quite a bit.

 

I bought the laptop from Dixons, and HFC Bank provided the loan.

 

Regards,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok in the consumer section log onto the store concerned and start a thread there.

Run your claim after reading the faqs

 

FROM WHAT YOU SAY LOOKS LIKE YOU HAVE A CLAIM

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Hello,

Had great success is taking the Halifax to court last year, so I dug up some old accounts and tried the same with my other old banks.

The HFC Bank and I had a hire purchase agreement (through Dixons) for a laptop. I've since paid this off, but during the period they frequently charged me "admin fees" and additional interest for late payments.

I've totalled all this up and sent them a Request for Repayment.

They've said:

"HFC Bank have carefully considered the OFT's publication but does not accept the principle that its findings apply to your type of account" - they are saying its credit cards only.

and

"I regret we are not prepared to make any refund of the default charges payable or provide any compensation."

:confused: I'm a little concerned as this is the strongest shove off I've seen from the banks. Are they just getting in there early? Should I be deterred? Does it matter that this was a hire purchase agreement?

Has anybody else had any experiences? Shall I just plough on with the LBA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

HFC are easy. I didn't even threaten Court action. Here are the letters I used: -

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

I write with regards to the above account number.

 

I recently received a breakdown of my loan account and was shocked to discover the following: -

 

6 x £15 Admin Fee and 1 x £50 Default Fee. Total £140 + interest.

 

I respectfully request a refund of these penalties as they are disproportionate and are not a true representation of the actual loss incurred by HFC Bank. Furthermore I don't recall a clause in my original credit agreement whereby a £50 fee would be added to my account should it default.

 

If HFC say that these charges are not disproportionate, then will HFC please demonstrate this by letting me have a full breakdown of the costs which HFC have incurred as a result of my breaches, and in order to reassure me that these penalties really do reflect HFC Bank's costs?

 

I look Forward to hearing from you soon.

 

Yours Faithfully

 

HFC Replied, no sod of. I then wrote:

 

Dear HFC,

 

Thank you for your letter dated 5th April 2007, the contents of which have been duly noted. Please escalate my complaint in accordance with the “Guide to Internal Complaints Procedure” HFC Bank very kindly sent to me.

 

I understand that the charges for Late Payment, being Overlimit and being in Default are clearly set out in the agreements which a customer would sign. I now understand this because of the letter HFC Bank sent to me dated 5th April 2007. With all due respect, I don't believe that because a customer has simply signed an agreement that this would make HFC Bank's charges “fair and reasonable”.

 

One thing that interests me more than most is the leaflet which HFC Bank kindly provided. I note that HFC Bank subscribe to the Banking code and one of the standards of practice is that “all cases of financial difficulty will be dealt with quickly, sympathetically and positively”. This raises a couple of questions which I would like HFC Bank to provide an answer to: -

 

1. How is adding fees onto an account each month a positive and sympathetic approach?

 

2. Why when HFC contacted me about none payment were they not sympathetic?

 

3. If HFC Bank's charges are fair and reasonable, then as I requested in my previous letter, would HFC Bank please give a breakdown of how they arrived at these charges and send this information to me?

 

The fact you haven't already sent me this breakdown as requested in my previous letter leads me to believe that the charges HFC Bank have levied from me are not fair nor do they represent the true cost to HFC Bank.

 

Please refund these charges as requested in my letter dated 31st March 2007.

 

I look forward to hearing from you soon.

 

Yours sincerely

 

I then get a 50% offer. I say no way Pedro:

 

 

Dear HFC,

 

Thank you for your letter dated 20th April 2007, the contents of which have been duly noted. Please escalate my complaint in accordance with the “Guide to Internal Complaints Procedure” HFC Bank very kindly sent to me.

 

I understand that the charges for Late Payment, being Overlimit and being in Default are clearly set out in the agreements which a customer would sign. I now understand this because of the letters HFC Bank sent to me dated 5th April 2007 and 20th April 2007. With all due respect, I don't believe that because a customer has simply signed an agreement that this would make HFC Bank's charges “fair and reasonable”.

 

In my letter dated 12th April 2007, I raised the questions below. Unfortunately the letter I have received did not address these points and I would appreciate a response.

 

1. How is adding fees onto an account each month a positive and sympathetic approach (one of the Banking Code Guidelines)?

 

2. Why when HFC contacted me about none payment were they not sympathetic?

 

3. If HFC Bank's charges are fair and reasonable, then as I requested in my previous letter, would HFC Bank please give a breakdown of how they arrived at these charges and send this information to me?

 

4. Why was I not made of aware of the Payment Protection insurance?

 

The fact you haven't already sent me this breakdown as requested in my previous letters leads me to believe that the charges HFC Bank have levied from me are not fair nor do they represent the true cost to HFC Bank. I understand the explanations HFC have provided in terms of the fees charged to my account but don't believe the actual loss sustained by HFC Bank can be substantiated by the level of the charges imposed upon myself.

 

Please refund these charges as requested in my letters dated 31st March 2007 and 12th April 2007.

 

If HFC bank are not in a position to refund these charges then can I be granted referral rights so that I may take my case to the Financial Ombudsman? I am hoping this won't be necessary to save both HFC Bank and myself time in resolving this matter.

 

I do hope the above is not necessary and that we can reach a satisfactory conclusion.

 

I look forward to hearing from you soon.

 

Yours sincerely

 

HFC replied with a full offer.

Completed:

Woolwich: Received £30

Intelligent Finance: Received £1100 after two years and approximately 20 letters, 6 pieces of hair and an eyeball.

Barclaycard: Received £90

HFC: Received £170

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...