Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Milo19 Vs Capital One - **WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6465 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Made 1st approached for repayment on 5th July for £860.00, received letter from Mr. Robert Udy offering £214.00 - Wrote back with this response.

Thank you for your letter dated 18th July 2006.

I have to say that I find your offer of £264.00.00 some what insulting taking into account that the total Capital One have charged me currently stands at £660.00. I have included two charges that have been added since my first letter.

I am happy to acknowledge this as partial payment of the money owed to me, however I will still be looking for payment of the outstanding amount and this does not constitute closure of my overall claim.

With regard to your comments concerning the OFT statement of April 5th, whether or not you disagree with the OFT's analysis is irrelevant.

Indeed, your response indicates that you have clearly missed the whole point of the OFT enquiry, and subsequent statement. In line with the OFT, customers also agree that banks have a right, as a business, to levy charges where there has been a requirement to intervene in customer accounts. The argument of customers, and also of the OFT, is that these charges must be fair, proportional, and a reflection of the actual loss to the bank for their action.

 

When the charge is issued as a penalty, the position of customers and the OFT is that the charge is unlawful under contract law, and is therefore unenforceable. To quote the OFT statement, 'We consider that a contract term is likely to be unfair if it requires consumers to pay more as a result of a default than the court would order them to pay if they were sued for breach of contract. This means that a default charge should not exceed a reasonable pre-estimate of the administrative costs that the consumer ought to have realised would be likely to be incurred by his or her card issuer in dealing with defaults.'

 

Additionally, the OFT did NOT state that it 'believes a default fee of £12 is fair.' What they actually said, and I quote, 'We are not suggesting that default fees should be set at £12, and a court will certainly not consider that a default fee is fair just because it is below the threshold.'

 

As you are clearly aware, most banks, as well as the BBA, have indicated that they think the analysis is wrong, unfair, or only related to credit cards. However, the fact remains that the OFT has stated it is subject to all consumer contracts - including bank accounts, overdrafts and mortgages

 

When the OFT makes a ruling, then creditors are expected, and indeed required, to comply. All banks and credit card companies, in general, hold licences to lend money under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

With this in mind, and considering your ill-judged analysis, I may refer this to the OFT for misrepresentation, and one of the punishments available, is the revoking of a licence under the 1974 Act.

I require repayment in full of this money an if you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount with interest plus my costs and without further notice.

I look forward to hearing your comments

Now just waiting to hear from them. They have until10th August.

 

Barclays Bank - SETTLED - £4225.00

First National - SETTLED - £125.00

Lloyds TSB - SETTLED - £994.87

Capital 1 - SETTLED - £827.95

Online Finance - SETTLED - £349.60

Argos - SETTLED - £121.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Recieved a letter back to saying, "sorry to hear your disappointed, we dont have to give you anything, and our offer was out the kindness of their hearts"

 

Laugh is this came all too late, as they ran out of time, and more than likely Mr Robert Udy already has the court paper sitting in his in tray!!!!

Barclays Bank - SETTLED - £4225.00

First National - SETTLED - £125.00

Lloyds TSB - SETTLED - £994.87

Capital 1 - SETTLED - £827.95

Online Finance - SETTLED - £349.60

Argos - SETTLED - £121.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Letter recieved whilst I was in New York, dated 01/09 -

 

OFFERING FULL SETTLEMENT, WITH NO CONDITIONS. JUST WAITING FOR CHEQUE.

 

They aplied to more charges during this, so I wrote them a covering letter when I sent their form back saying, refund them, or I'll do the same!!!!

 

LOVELY - £827.95 - Just as I come back from holiday, and belive me, I'm now skint!!!!

 

YEAH BABY!!

Barclays Bank - SETTLED - £4225.00

First National - SETTLED - £125.00

Lloyds TSB - SETTLED - £994.87

Capital 1 - SETTLED - £827.95

Online Finance - SETTLED - £349.60

Argos - SETTLED - £121.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you - Just waiting for cheque before advising the court!!!

Barclays Bank - SETTLED - £4225.00

First National - SETTLED - £125.00

Lloyds TSB - SETTLED - £994.87

Capital 1 - SETTLED - £827.95

Online Finance - SETTLED - £349.60

Argos - SETTLED - £121.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Still not recieved a cheque, its been over a week?? any ideas!!??

Barclays Bank - SETTLED - £4225.00

First National - SETTLED - £125.00

Lloyds TSB - SETTLED - £994.87

Capital 1 - SETTLED - £827.95

Online Finance - SETTLED - £349.60

Argos - SETTLED - £121.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Milo19,

 

After receiving a similar reply from Mr Rober Udy, offering to reduce the fees added to £12 each - do you mind if I pinch your letter as I thought it was brill!

NatWest

Data Protection Act Letter - 06/08/2006

Statements rec'd 14/9/2006

Preliminary Letter sent - 27/9/06

LBA - 18/10/06

Claim with Court - 31/10/2006

Got until 14/11/06 to acknowledge.

7/11/06 Received ltr offering full settlement minus

interest + court costs

12/11/06 - Rejection sent

17/11/6006 - Natwest Acknowledged

4/12/06 - Rec'd Natwest Def (Cobbetts)

5/1206 - Rec'd partial offer (Cobbetts)

THE WOOLWICH

Data Protection Act Letter - 06/08/2006

List of charges rec'd - 04/9/2006

Prelimary Letter sent - 06/09/2006

Response - 'fully investigating' - 11/09/2006

Claim with Court - 20/10/06

Acknowledged - 20/10/2006

Defence by 17/11/2006

AQ to be returned - 11/12/2006

Court Date - 14/02/2007

**SETTLED IN FULL**

CAPITAL ONE

**SETTLED IN FULL** 3/11/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Milo,

I really hope it comes through for you.... Just had a very discouraging conversation with Cap1 saying that they have been cleared by the OFT to only pay the exess of £12 fee this week so are not paying out anymore full claims.

I am in a real quandery now as my claim has other complications.

Good luck!

[SIZE=1] [SIZE=1][COLOR=royalblue][COLOR=black][B]NatWest [/B] Offer accepted - 24/07/06 - £615[/COLOR][/COLOR][/SIZE] [SIZE=1][COLOR=royalblue][COLOR=black]-----------------------------------------------[/COLOR][/COLOR][/SIZE] [SIZE=1][COLOR=royalblue][COLOR=black][B]Cap One [/B] Prelim - 22/08/06[/COLOR][/COLOR][/SIZE] [SIZE=1][COLOR=royalblue][COLOR=#000000]LBA sent - 06/09/06 [/COLOR][/COLOR][/SIZE][SIZE=1][COLOR=royalblue][COLOR=#000000] MCOL issued 06/10/06 Served 11/10/06. Acknowledged - Deadline 25/10/06 [COLOR=Red] Offer of full settlement via personal cheque accepted £269. Wait 14 days in post for cheque from - 07/11/06 [/COLOR] [/COLOR] [/COLOR][/SIZE][SIZE=2][COLOR=magenta][B][COLOR=darkslateblue]Hit the [/COLOR][COLOR=darkslateblue][URL="https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr"][COLOR=red]DONATE BUTTON[/COLOR] [/URL]and give 5% back to support this site! And don't forget the [COLOR=red]survey ;) [/COLOR][/COLOR][/B][/COLOR][/SIZE] [/SIZE]

Link to post
Share on other sites

....Just had a very discouraging conversation with Cap1 saying that they have been cleared by the OFT to only pay the exess of £12 fee this week so are not paying out anymore full claims.....

 

But aren't you also actioning on the grounds that you are claiming for monies taken by them in the form of charges, which is a disproprotiate penality and consequently unenforceable - contrary to common law. Invalid under the Unfiar (contracts) terms act 1977 s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. Para.8 and sch.2(1)(e). In the event that the charges are not a penalty then they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15.

 

and of course in your letter(s) to Capital One you would have asked Capital One to justify their charges but haven't done.

 

Capital One keep leaning towards what the OFT have stated but it's more than that.

NatWest

Data Protection Act Letter - 06/08/2006

Statements rec'd 14/9/2006

Preliminary Letter sent - 27/9/06

LBA - 18/10/06

Claim with Court - 31/10/2006

Got until 14/11/06 to acknowledge.

7/11/06 Received ltr offering full settlement minus

interest + court costs

12/11/06 - Rejection sent

17/11/6006 - Natwest Acknowledged

4/12/06 - Rec'd Natwest Def (Cobbetts)

5/1206 - Rec'd partial offer (Cobbetts)

THE WOOLWICH

Data Protection Act Letter - 06/08/2006

List of charges rec'd - 04/9/2006

Prelimary Letter sent - 06/09/2006

Response - 'fully investigating' - 11/09/2006

Claim with Court - 20/10/06

Acknowledged - 20/10/2006

Defence by 17/11/2006

AQ to be returned - 11/12/2006

Court Date - 14/02/2007

**SETTLED IN FULL**

CAPITAL ONE

**SETTLED IN FULL** 3/11/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Milo19,

 

After receiving a similar reply from Mr Rober Udy, offering to reduce the fees added to £12 each - do you mind if I pinch your letter as I thought it was brill!

 

Yes, no problem, just don't sign it from me :p

 

Hi Milo,

I really hope it comes through for you.... Just had a very discouraging conversation with Cap1 saying that they have been cleared by the OFT to only pay the exess of £12 fee this week so are not paying out anymore full claims.

I am in a real quandery now as my claim has other complications.

Good luck!

 

Don't worry, as soon as they get the court papers, they cave in. If you get to the AQ bit, just ask the judge for a disclosure, they then sh*t themselves and pay up, or offer to at least.

 

 

I've sent a letter to a Mrs. Angelina Wilson, top dog at the executive office asking where the hell my cheque is and where my letter is confirming account closure!

Barclays Bank - SETTLED - £4225.00

First National - SETTLED - £125.00

Lloyds TSB - SETTLED - £994.87

Capital 1 - SETTLED - £827.95

Online Finance - SETTLED - £349.60

Argos - SETTLED - £121.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry, as soon as they get the court papers, they cave in. If you get to the AQ bit, just ask the judge for a disclosure, they then sh*t themselves and pay up, or offer to at least.

 

What do you mean by asking the judge for a disclosure? Tried reading through other threads and FAQ - but can't see it. Sorry if it's a daft question.

NatWest

Data Protection Act Letter - 06/08/2006

Statements rec'd 14/9/2006

Preliminary Letter sent - 27/9/06

LBA - 18/10/06

Claim with Court - 31/10/2006

Got until 14/11/06 to acknowledge.

7/11/06 Received ltr offering full settlement minus

interest + court costs

12/11/06 - Rejection sent

17/11/6006 - Natwest Acknowledged

4/12/06 - Rec'd Natwest Def (Cobbetts)

5/1206 - Rec'd partial offer (Cobbetts)

THE WOOLWICH

Data Protection Act Letter - 06/08/2006

List of charges rec'd - 04/9/2006

Prelimary Letter sent - 06/09/2006

Response - 'fully investigating' - 11/09/2006

Claim with Court - 20/10/06

Acknowledged - 20/10/2006

Defence by 17/11/2006

AQ to be returned - 11/12/2006

Court Date - 14/02/2007

**SETTLED IN FULL**

CAPITAL ONE

**SETTLED IN FULL** 3/11/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Milo... Still no payment - incredible.

Watching this space, along with quite a few others too I should think.

Yes, pray tell more about this disclosure business...

[SIZE=1] [SIZE=1][COLOR=royalblue][COLOR=black][B]NatWest [/B] Offer accepted - 24/07/06 - £615[/COLOR][/COLOR][/SIZE] [SIZE=1][COLOR=royalblue][COLOR=black]-----------------------------------------------[/COLOR][/COLOR][/SIZE] [SIZE=1][COLOR=royalblue][COLOR=black][B]Cap One [/B] Prelim - 22/08/06[/COLOR][/COLOR][/SIZE] [SIZE=1][COLOR=royalblue][COLOR=#000000]LBA sent - 06/09/06 [/COLOR][/COLOR][/SIZE][SIZE=1][COLOR=royalblue][COLOR=#000000] MCOL issued 06/10/06 Served 11/10/06. Acknowledged - Deadline 25/10/06 [COLOR=Red] Offer of full settlement via personal cheque accepted £269. Wait 14 days in post for cheque from - 07/11/06 [/COLOR] [/COLOR] [/COLOR][/SIZE][SIZE=2][COLOR=magenta][B][COLOR=darkslateblue]Hit the [/COLOR][COLOR=darkslateblue][URL="https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr"][COLOR=red]DONATE BUTTON[/COLOR] [/URL]and give 5% back to support this site! And don't forget the [COLOR=red]survey ;) [/COLOR][/COLOR][/B][/COLOR][/SIZE] [/SIZE]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - I think I've fathomed out what is meant by asking the judge/court for 'disclosure'.

 

I think it's where you can request the bank to lodge in court financial vouching for the actual loss sustain in your case, together with the banks full financial accounts revealing how much inome is generated from their bank charges, against the cost of administering dishonoured transactions.

 

Maybe wrong????

NatWest

Data Protection Act Letter - 06/08/2006

Statements rec'd 14/9/2006

Preliminary Letter sent - 27/9/06

LBA - 18/10/06

Claim with Court - 31/10/2006

Got until 14/11/06 to acknowledge.

7/11/06 Received ltr offering full settlement minus

interest + court costs

12/11/06 - Rejection sent

17/11/6006 - Natwest Acknowledged

4/12/06 - Rec'd Natwest Def (Cobbetts)

5/1206 - Rec'd partial offer (Cobbetts)

THE WOOLWICH

Data Protection Act Letter - 06/08/2006

List of charges rec'd - 04/9/2006

Prelimary Letter sent - 06/09/2006

Response - 'fully investigating' - 11/09/2006

Claim with Court - 20/10/06

Acknowledged - 20/10/2006

Defence by 17/11/2006

AQ to be returned - 11/12/2006

Court Date - 14/02/2007

**SETTLED IN FULL**

CAPITAL ONE

**SETTLED IN FULL** 3/11/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...