Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5490 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey ya..

 

Another quicky..

 

I was away in Scotland at the weekend, and i've just found out my husband didn't make payment to brighthouse on Saturday.. I have just rang them up and asked for a re-write and i was told no chance as i do not have OSC..

 

Where do i stand with this??

 

Im now expecting a couple heavys at the door as i can't afford to make the week + an extra week payment.. The items we have are not "luxary" apart from the wii which i am dumping on the desk next time im in town..

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

When this happened to me, I just went in regardless, paid the one weeks amount (which they put in the yellow money :rolleyes:) then went back on the Saturday and made another payment.

 

They then could not say I had not paid them - if they didn't take it off the agreements, then that was not my fault ;)

 

Also, you don't need OSC for a re-write. However, as you are only one week late, it's not really worth the hassle of the re-write. Just do what I have suggested. They may well refuse to take the money off the agreements, but they wont refuse to put it in the yellow money :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good advice from Clemma!

 

And I was also going to say that they will rarely do a re-write when an account is less than about 3 weeks late.

 

If you can return an item to reliee the debt then great.

 

More importantly though, if you do make a payment but they refuse to pay any of your agreements, instead putting it into yellow money, then do 2 things:

 

1) KEEP THE RECEIPT as this proves you went in on that day

 

2) TAKE THE CASHIERS NAME which will scare the smelly stuff out of them!

 

Doesn't hurt!!

 

PJ

PlumberJon :-D

 

UNUS VIR OBVIAM ORBIS TERRARUM

 

Are you being harrassed by a DCA or Brighthouse. Click the link for OFT Debt collection guidelines. Chances are, they could be in breach of some part of sections 2 or 3 or both!

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

 

 

I just give advice, I can't do it for you though!!

 

If you were helped, then please wiggle my scales, and you might get a wiggle back!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

just wantto add something im in 5 weeks arears and when i went in to pay in the yellow money they told me they had stopped the yellow money dont know if they was lying but they said they stopped it last month

 

i went to legal aid and they did a three way telephone call to bright house and i ave been quite lucky they ave done a rewrite on my account took all the arrears off and as i can not afford the weekly amount any more we came to an agreement that i took one of the items back which i didnt really need and lowered my weekly payments from 72 pounds to 30 pounds and extented my agreements thay would not do this before but legal aid informed them they was not to cum to my house and take anything as i was willing to pay some thing back and she told them that if they did not accept the 30 pound a week she was going to apply to court for my payments to be lowered so they accepted my offer and all the late charges was to be wiped off my account

i would advise any body to phone legal aid up have them in on the conversation as they seemed to b more helpful in that way it shows me that they can help u but just dont want to unless u have somebody to back u up who knows ur rights #

and thank you clemma for all ur advise it was really helpful and u put my mind to rest thanxs:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...