Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cupcake vs Egg 03


cupcake68
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4597 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanks guys

 

I was originally buying time to see what the outcome of PT's case would do for me.

 

It has kind of just dragged along from there but GH suggested I CCA Egg because they cant take me to court if they have not complied with my request. Is this the case and if so what do I d about it?

 

I realise I am now just pushing my luck ad hoping that being that it is BC and he is known for not being the best that they may trip themselves up.

 

I know the chances are that I am gong to get a CCJ and possibly a charge but am I not right in saying that as my house is in joint names (we are not married)and there is very little equity in it that a charging order won't do much for them?

 

Can someone also please clarify that because they have chosen small claims track that this is better for me because of the charges being less?

 

Thanks agani

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 480
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ummm, sorry if I'm being silly, haven't Egg already taken you to court ? (well BC but same debt) so not really sure I get the thinking that even though you already have had two copies of the agreement, sending a CCA request to Egg again will change anything ? Like I said, sorry if I'm being silly, I havent read the entire thread just had a quick peruse earlier.

 

The debts £15k isnt it. What kind of offer will you be making in your admission ?(assuming they send the docs as ordered by 25th Nov) If you go with monthly installments then its more likely you'll get that accepted and ordered and then the liklihood of getting a CO is lower.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The High Court has ruled that Egg credit card agreements are enforceable

 

So, i share the concerns of MU

 

 

When did they do that?

My Posts exist exclusively to assist me in preparing litigation against another party.

As such, it is almost certainly protected by litigation privilege.

 

The legal requirements for claiming litigation privilege are well established and are not in dispute.

Communication between a solicitor, or the client, or a third party will be protected by litigation privilege where the communications are for the dominent purpose of obtaining legal advice in connection with, or conducting litigation in prospect: Re: "Highgate Traders Limited (1984)"BCLC 151.

 

Copyright Information: All information contained in this website , Associated websites, and Forum posts are Copyright "Reclaim The Right Ltd". If you wish to use the information on this site for publication elsewhere then please email the administrator for permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it was around September 2010 when the judgment was handed down

 

Isnt this similiar to the Manchester cases? The onus of proof was on the claimant? Totally different to EGG being the claimant.

My Posts exist exclusively to assist me in preparing litigation against another party.

As such, it is almost certainly protected by litigation privilege.

 

The legal requirements for claiming litigation privilege are well established and are not in dispute.

Communication between a solicitor, or the client, or a third party will be protected by litigation privilege where the communications are for the dominent purpose of obtaining legal advice in connection with, or conducting litigation in prospect: Re: "Highgate Traders Limited (1984)"BCLC 151.

 

Copyright Information: All information contained in this website , Associated websites, and Forum posts are Copyright "Reclaim The Right Ltd". If you wish to use the information on this site for publication elsewhere then please email the administrator for permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know the chances are that I am gong to get a CCJ and possibly a charge but am I not right in saying that as my house is in joint names (we are not married)and there is very little equity in it that a charging order won't do much for them?

 

Can someone also please clarify that because they have chosen small claims track that this is better for me because of the charges being less?

 

Thanks agani

 

Cupcake

 

Hi CC. Long time no speak :smile:.

 

Even if by some chance they got the CO it's unlikely to be of any worth to them unless you're planning on moving soon. Have your arguments ready though, it's worth a fight.

 

SC will limit your exposure to costs btw.

 

M

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I must point out the risk of costs is still there if you defend a case which is undefendable, this may be deemed as unreasonable conduct and if this is the case, then the court can and likely will depart from the rules on costs in the SCT and can award any costs incurred as a result of unreasonable conduct

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

its often incorrectly overlook on these forums, and i have had so many people contact our office saying that they want to appeal cos the judge wasnt allowed to order costs, and we have to explain that he or she can in circumstances such as those in 27(2)(g) CPR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, just one thing - have you ever received a copy of the agreement & T&Cs that were applicable at the time of signing.

 

IIRC you have only received a copy of the agreement & T&C's that applied in 2009.

 

This is the Timeline you posted http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?198523-cupcake68-Vs-Egg&p=2956717&viewfull=1#post2956717

 

As I have been saying, you are fishing and may be just delaying the inevitable BUT you have raised an official complaint that they are still in default of your original CCA request and they have still not complied with that let alone the recent one. Whilst not complying fully they cannot obtain a Judgement. It may be worth submitting an app to Order their compliance - then you can't get hijacked on teh day before a trial (gives you time to negotiate, submit an S129 app, or admit etc before trial)

 

Still wondering why this account is with Carter & SCT rather than Drydens & fast track .....

If you find my advice helpful - please click on my scales

<<<<<< - they're over there!

Well, it's a funny black star now ...

The small print - any advice I give is freely given on the understanding that I am a layman and am not legally qualified in anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi GH

 

Great to hear from you.

 

I have had no reply to my CCA request of 15th October 2010 and am still unclear as to whether they have supplied the original agreement in the past or whether it was the current agreement or maybe they have not changed it at al since July 07!!!

 

Also when they sent the recent copy of agreement via carter they only sent the agreement so technically they have not supplied the termination or default notices!

 

I am going to wait until 25th to call the court and see if they have complied and if a date has been set but don't know what I should be doing because they have ignored my request.

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi GH

 

Great to hear from you.

 

I have had no reply to my CCA request of 15th October 2010 and am still unclear as to whether they have supplied the original agreement in the past or whether it was the current agreement or maybe they have not changed it at al since July 07!!!

 

Also when they sent the recent copy of agreement via carter they only sent the agreement so technically they have not supplied the termination or default notices!

 

I am going to wait until 25th to call the court and see if they have complied and if a date has been set but don't know what I should be doing because they have ignored my request.

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi MU

 

Yes they did file, the date has been set to 3 days before I am due to give birth!!!

 

I now have to try and negotiate a deal with them.

 

My situation is pretty dire at the moment and I have recently tried to negotiate a deal with my bank re an overdraft. I offered them £5 a month and they refused saying I could't afford it but then went on to order that I pay £350 immediately!!!

 

If Egg behave in the same manner we might not be able to agree a monthly payment!!

 

Wish me luck!

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MU

 

Yes they did file, the date has been set to 3 days before I am due to give birth!!!

 

I now have to try and negotiate a deal with them.

 

My situation is pretty dire at the moment and I have recently tried to negotiate a deal with my bank re an overdraft. I offered them £5 a month and they refused saying I could't afford it but then went on to order that I pay £350 immediately!!!

 

If Egg behave in the same manner we might not be able to agree a monthly payment!!

 

Wish me luck!

 

Cupcake

 

Cupcake

 

Surely with a doctor's note you can get this case postponed until after you have had the baby? they shouldn't be asking you to go through such a stressful experience at such a time - unless the judge can double up as a midwife!

 

Secondly, if the Bank has said this in writing they clearly accept your hardship (not being able to afford £5 per month) - so MUST treat you sympathetically - report them to FOS (and cost them around £500) if they won't play ball with treating you appropriately and sympathetically whilst in hardship. They should immediately suspend all interest and charges and agree an AFFORDABLE repayment schedule. There is more on this on the MSE web site (not sure if CAG also has such generic stuff too?)

 

Good luck - hope this helps!

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BD

 

I think I have to try and negotiate a payment plan before the court date (5 months away!) I don't have much of a case now they have supplied an agreement!

 

I am not too worried at this point because to be honest they can't have what I don't have so they will have to wait but I am not expecting it to be easy to agree a plan when they see how little we have right now!

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Ok

 

Can't put it off any longer!!

 

I need to try and arrange a suitable payment to Egg to stop court proceedings

 

Do I write to Egg or Brian Carter to do this?

 

Am I right in saying I explain our circumstances and give them a breakdown of our income and expenditure. I then make an offer (which is unlikely to be more than a couple of pound a month!!).

 

Thanks guys

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cupcake

 

Sorry - I forgot to post yesterday. This is what I did to get Egg and Bryan Carter off my back. I am now paying £5 per month (for next 800 months or so - by which time I'll be over 130 years old).

 

I would send a VERY BRIEF (not at all detailed I&E) along the lines of the Common Financial Statement (got from CCCS or National Debtline) showing that you have fairly divided your remaining disposable income on a pro rata basis among all unsecured creditors.

 

If not already registered, then ring CCCS ASAP and get a telephone appointment. Have all your Income and Expenditure info along with all unsecured debts ready and they'll help you put the I&E together. They should also be able to get Egg to give you a bit of time to get this info to them. NB. They are NOT TOTALLY on your side - funded by Banks and their aim is to get debts repaid but in affordable amounts and longer timescales. They won't help like CAG will regarding unenforceability issues or lower F&F negotiations etc - but a useful tool in your tool box to get a bit of piece of mind and avoid court proceedings.

 

Hope this helps?

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cupcake

 

In late 2009 I tried to get a thread going to gather info on who was likely to go to Court, back off, keep bluffing, etc. etc.

 

Only 2 or 3 guys responded - see attached link.

 

Hope it helps?

 

BD

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?227592-How-ready-are-various-DCA-s-or-Original-Creditors-to-go-to-Court&p=2520642&viewfull=1#post2520642

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...