Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

TSB Debt - lowell/BCW letters after 7yrs - Statute Barred Scotland???


poppy111
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4597 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If you start a thread in the Debt Action Group section of the site, everyone will be happy to help.

 

If your debt is over six years old, with no payments or correspondence in the last six years it may be statute barred. Have you any more information you can give?

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, poppy.

 

 

 

Law relating to debts: statute-barred debts

 

If a lender allows time to pass without receiving any payment an action for recovery may become barred.

 

 

Under the Limitations Act 1980 the time limits are

 

* in simple contracts (credit cards, loans, etc.), 6 years

* in contracts under seal (mortgages), 12 years.

 

If the debtor acknowledges the debt in writing or makes a part payment within the original limitation period, then the time limits start to run again from the date of acknowledgement or the date of payment.

 

Even though the lender may be barred from pursuing recovery, a debtor may decide to pay the debt after the expiry of the time limits. Because of this you should allow a debt which is otherwise statute-barred if the personal representatives pay the debt and you receive evidence that the payment has been made.

 

The above instructions do not apply to debts in Scotland. Under Scottish law, if a lender allows time to pass without receiving any payment an action for recovery may become barred under the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973. (For details of this Act see Gloag and Henderson 10th edition at Chapter 15.). These debts are completely extinguished and cannot be enforced. Once the prescriptive period expires the debt cannot be allowed as a deduction.

 

To sum up, basically once a debt becomes statute barred it is up to the debtor whether or not they wish to pay the debt. A debt can not become unstatute barred.

 

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi. if you are not sure when last payment was made,you could sar the oc.

is the debt on your credit file?

SAM:pLOWELL DETESTER

Thanks for info last payment was about 7-8years ago not sure about

credit file been a while since i checked it although have been refused a credit card last year

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for info last payment was about 7-8years ago not sure about

credit file been a while since i checked it although have been refused a credit card last year

MAYBE DEFAULTED A WHILE AFTER LAST PAYMENT ,SO STILL SHOWING ON FILE.BUT IF YOU HAVE NOT PAYED FOR 6 YEARS AT LEAST.....

 

STATUTE BARRED

CONGRATULATIONS

SAM:pLOWELL DETESTER

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again thanks to everyone who gave advice on statute barred and apologies for not replying to everyone.

new to this and still trying to find my way round the site.

 

just so you don,t get the wrong impression i did not set out not to pay this debt and was paying it up to about 7-8 years ago but when i ran out of bank pay-in slips i applied for more to the DCA who was handling it they never got in touch again

they did,nt bother so neither did i. not right but!!

 

It was last year that i got threatening letters from LP1 and then this year from BCW on their behalf so as i,ve not paid for at least 7 years i think i,ll just keep ignoring their threats and see what happens. thanks again to all

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hello all

just a update on how things are going

the demands continue to arrive.

 

I,am beginning to wonder if as in my case as this debt is statue barred

do these D.C. know it,s statue barred and are just trying bullying tactics to try and get money from you

 

As the threats range from severe to nearly begging me to pay something.

(1) Do i continue to ignore if i do answer does that mean the debt is restarted?

(2) Do i send my own threats claiming harassment if they don,t stop sending demands.

 

If anyone has any advice it would be appreciated. thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

More info needed.

1.When is the alleged debt from ?

2.Have you ever acknowledged it ?

3.If you are aware of the debt is it a live account or has it been sold on-if so was you sent default notices and any details of the sale ie assignment.

4.Who is the original creditor/lender

5.Who is chasing the debt ?

6.How much are we talking ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Three threads merged...........

 

Poppy111, please stick to this thread with any more updates ;)

 

Thanks.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you sent them the letter telling them this is statute barred?

Hi no i,ve not sent anything.Have not even acknowledged any of there letters they stopped in sept started again april same contents last warning or final demand

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pops....if you have not made a payment or acknowledged the debt in 6 years (5 in Scotland) then it will be statute barred, please send this letter here by recorded delivery - http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/599-letter-sent-when-debt-is-statute-barred.html

 

Once you state that you have no intention of paying towards a debt that is statute barred they HAVE to stop harrassing you... this is what the OFT say

 

2.14 (b) -

continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello

will tell you what i know

1. 1999

2. Was paying it to some DC can,t remember who up to 7yrs ago pay-in book was finished never got a new one they never got in touch again.

3. L.P.1 said it was now theirs year past FEB have never acknowledged their letters

4. TSB

5. Was L.P.1 now BCW on there behalf.

6.£3500

Thats the best i can do.

hope thats enough info

Moved house 4yrs ago have never paid anything here and was approx 3yrs at last address since paying anything

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats more than enough information! Send the letter posted by 42man to them ASAP. If they send you more threatening letters AFTER they have received the Statute Barred letter then come back here. When I was being chased for an SB debt AFTER telling them so, I just sent them a letter threatening to charge them for any more replies I had to send.......I haven't heard from them since (this was January) ;)

Edited by clemma
Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't notice the Scotland part - the letter posted by 42man is not applicable. Send this one instead

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Acc/Ref No 4563210025897412

 

You have contacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself.

 

I would point out that under The Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 Part 1 Section 6 "If, after the appropriate date, an obligation to which this section applies has subsisted for a continuous period of 5 years:

 

(a) without any relevant claim having been made in relation to the obligation, and

(b) without the subsistence of the obligation having been relevantly acknowledged,

then as from the expiration of that period the obligation shall be extinguished:"

 

I would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that "it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period".

 

The last acknowledgement of this alleged debt was made over five years ago. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from myself in the relevant period under Part 1 Section 6 of The Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 , I would respectfully suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against myself to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

Should you continue to pursue this account without providing this evidence I shall seek an interdict and damages accordingly. A formal complaint will also be made to Trading Standards along with a report to the OFT questioning your fitness to hold a consumer credit license.

 

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed and that no further contact will be made concerning the above account after that last letter.

 

I look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

Thanks to everyone who gave advise. Have decided to go with what you all suggested and post a statute barred letter off to them will keep you posted what happens. Before i go someone asked to click there scales if they had been helpful. No idea what that means but thanks anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi

well since deciding to send statute barred letter i was in the process of typing it out when i got a phone call DC 8:30 bank holiday taking by suprise

 

really said the first thing that came into my mind and that was to deny any knowledge of this debt which wasn't a lie really as they got the wrong bank

 

they said they would send for a copy of the agreement when i mentioned it was likely to be statute barred even if the debt was true they hung up. I

 

sent a letter to them denying debt unless they could provide a copy of the agreement.

This letter was signed for on the 7th of may have heard nothing since.

 

At a loss what to do next.

(a) Do i send another letter saying they have failed to produce a copy during the time limits ( 12 days i think they are allowed )

(b) send statute barred letter.© or sit and wait?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hi all did,nt think i would be contacting you again regarding this case since sending statute barred letter to LP1. They have contacted me stating that this debt was restarted because they say i paid £ 1:00

on the 12th jan 2010 which i have no knowledge of. I never even acknowledged there letters never mind paying anything any advice on where i stand now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi poppy

 

The phantom payment claim :!:

 

They have to prove beyond a doubt that it was you that made the payment so you now ask them for . .

 

The exact date

 

The location the payment was made from

 

If by cheque the name of the account holder/Bank

 

If by card the last four digits of the number

 

If by PO the number

 

If cash a copy of the receipt issued at the time

 

 

Don't let this little trick scare you as DCA's try this a lot and besides all the time scales you mention back up the Stat Barred

 

Get a letter sorted and then enjoy the weekend OR enjoy the weekend and do the letter Monday

 

R

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] I asked them to wait whilst I got my Bank card :violin:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Information that may help if a CCA request is refused due to the lack of a signature . . http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?248863-Signature-demands-fight-back-possible-!&highlight=

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...