Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cupcake VS Monument d


cupcake68
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4988 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Lowells Financial and Lowells Portfolio are two seperate entities but operate under the same roof.

 

There is a post by Banker_Rhymes_With on the forum which explains who owns who, and to whom you should communicate.

 

I'll have a look tomorrow if I remember.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys

 

I sent a CCA request to Monument in March and didn't hear anything so sent the account in dispute letter in April.

 

Since then I have been putting up with many calls and letters etc. but never received an agreement.

 

I had been passed onto portman house dca so I sent them the bemused letter.

 

I have now received a letter from monument saying they never received my cca request!

 

I have checked on the po website and the letters were both delivered (do they hold this information forever? - how do i prove delivery if not?)

 

I think their problem may be because I sent it to an address on the most recent statement I had at the time which is not the same address as they are quoting on their letterhead now.

 

What should I do now?

 

Is it my problem if they haven't had it sent through to the right department?

 

Thanks

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

as long as it went in a post box or was handed in at the post office then it is deemed delivered and served according to the interpretations act 1978, section 7. It does not matter if it was special delivery or normal second class.

 

This situation is a common messing you around stance. Send them a copy of the cca, quote the interpretations act and tell them it is in 78(6) dispute end of story either put up or shut up.

 

THen write to the new set of idiots and quote dpa and cputr and tell them in dispute with last lot, illegal to pass to 3rd party, I wont write to you again.

 

YOU set the hoops THEY do the jumpimg

simplez

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Guys!

 

The po site says it was delivered and gives a date but doesn't let me open the signature bit.

 

Should I be printing or saving(on pc) all proofs of delivery?

 

How long po keep the details on site?

 

If this interpreations act is correct does that not mean they can say they sent a copy of the cca when they didn't?

 

Thanks

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bring it up on the screen. Press both Ctrl and Print Screen SysRq at the same time. Open word and press ctrl and v at the same time and there you have it in word for posterity.

 

 

Given that they didnt 'get' you request, how can they say they sent you a reply? Anyway, if you put the matter in 78(6) dispute then they will have to provide an enforceable agreement to end the dispute. If they 'claim' they've already done that then they can send it again by reply:p.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Cupcake,

 

I feel ready to take on Monument for my CCA, not that I am getting anywhere with my other CCA requests!

 

Please could you tell me what address you sent your original request to, was it the address on the statement of Saffron Road Leicester?

 

Thank you

 

Dotty50

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just an update (in case this thread is of interest to anybody!!)

 

The latest letter from Lowells acknowledges my request for a copy of my agreement. "Compucredit are still in the process of retrieving the required paperwork and once this has been forwarded onto us a copy will be posted to you. There will be no further correspondence from us until the agreement has been received at which point we will require payment in full"

 

Tum ti tum!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Dotty

 

Sorry I have taken so long to reply - I must have over looked this thread!!

 

My original cca request was sent to customer services PO Box 6476, Northampton NN4 1ZN.

 

As printed on the front of my January 2009 statement (this request was sent in March 09).

 

This is the address they say is not theirs!!

 

Since then any correspondence received from them has been 51 Saffron Road, Leicester LE18 4US.

 

Hope that helps.

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask a quick question?

 

I have complained to the FOS about Monument and they have returned my file along with a form to fill in.

 

I have explained the situation as best I can and have now got onto the "please give us any other details that you think will help us understand your complaint" box........

 

Should I mention that the DN they sent me dated 17 June 09 (received 24 June 09!!) sent 2nd class royal mail, asking for payment by 1 july 09 was not properly executed?

 

Or should I be keeping this information back still?

 

Thanks guys!!

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CB

 

I received a DN in July 09 that was dated 060709, sent 2nd class received on 100709 stating we had to pay the arrears by 200709.

 

I think that means not enough time to remedy!

 

Then, in August I received a letter telling me my account had been closed. Not because of the way I have operated my account but due to the current economic climate!!!

 

I was then told in December 09 telling me that Barclays trasnferred it's rights to Raphaels, who then transferred their rights to Compucredit and Compucredit were now trasnferring me to JC International.

 

I'm assuming that means account closed?!

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, defective DN, unlawfully rescinded;

Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) Regulations 1983, a failure of a Default Notice or Termination Notice to be accurate not only invalidates such notice (Woodchester Lease Management Services Ltd V Swain & Co NLD 14 July 1998 but it is an unlawful rescission of contract which would not only prevent the court enforcing any alleged debt (Wilson V First County Trust Ltd [2003] UKHL 40, Wilson V Robertsons (London) Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 1088, Wilson V Pawnbrokers [2005] EWCA Civ 147) - but would also give the claimant a claim for damages in the sum of £1000 (Kpophraror V Woolwich Building Society [1996] 4 All ER 119).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have now received another copy of the reply card they say is my agreement. It is what I originally signed but does not have any of the prescribed terms.

 

I am no going to send this letter (as advised by Nurse Elsa on my amex thread- it has kept them quiet for some months now!)

 

Thank you for responding to my formal request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a copy of the compliant executed agreement relating to the above account.

However, unfortunately the document you provided does not satisfy this request, in that it is an reply card and does not contain the prescribed terms and conditions necessary to make it an agreement enforceable by the Courts. I am sure you must be aware, in the current climate, of what the prescribed terms are, but if you are in any doubt I will be pleased to elaborate.

 

Consequently, until a valid executed agreement is supplied, the account remains in dispute and as such further enforcement action cannot be taken.

 

I am fully aware of the recent test case of RBS vs McGuffick, however to pre-empt any attempt at confusion on your part I would point out that this referred to an agreement which was compliant but temporarily unavailable, therefore does not apply in my case.[/

 

With regard to the definition of "enforcement", I would remind you also that you are still required to comply with OFT debt collecting guidelines in order to retain your Consumer Credit Licence.

 

I am anxious to be reasonable in this matter, therefore I am allowing you a further 14 days in which to comply with the requirements of my request and supply a valid agreement

 

We'll see what they come up with.

 

Cupcake

Edited by cupcake68
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Cupcake,

 

Not a problem, I did use the Saffron Road address and they responded very quickly, just deciding what to do next.

 

Like yours, mine was closed last year even though it was always paid on time but have just stopped the direct debit.

 

Will probably ask for details of their payment break plan, which I have been paying and put a claim in for that first as they sent nothing referring to it in the SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just an update!

 

Heard from Lowells.

 

"We thank you for your recent letter and apologise for the delay in replying.

 

Your comments have been noted and we have queried these with Compucredit.

 

We will advise you of their response upon receipt"

 

I wonder how long they will take?

 

Cupcake

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Cupcake,

 

Just had a read, thanks for putting the link to it for me.

 

There doesn't seem to be many threads for this card so it is good to find someone to follow it with.

 

I only stopped paying this card earlier this year so no DCA's yet but at least I will now be familiar with the ones they use.

 

My next job is to go through the statements they sent and work out PPI, they have offered half of what they say I have paid over the last 6 years but no mention of interest so rejection letter on its way soon.

 

BTW it's called Payment Break Plan, were you paying it? They state that it is not PP but it is, in disguise!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi Guys

 

I have finally received Lowells response (waiting since March 2010).

 

"After reviewing the account, we are prepared to take a commercial view in relation to this matter and as a gesture of goodwill and strictly without any admission of liability, we are prepared to close the account and write-off any outstanding balance.

 

We trust that you will find this satisfactory and that this mater is now closed."

 

:-D

 

Thanks to Undercover Elsas letter!! (will be thanking her personally next).

 

Do I need to do any more?

 

Thanks so much for everybodies support and advice.

 

Cupcake

Edited by cupcake68
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...