Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Who does the base rate cut benefit?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5623 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The way I see it it won't be passed on to customers, it merly gives the banks an excuse to cut savings rates thus protecting/increasing thier margins. Case in point Nationwide HAS increased its SVR but this is not available to new customers.

 

Overdraft, credit card and loan rates remain high. If we accept that bank rates have no link to the BOE base rate won't that have negative consequences for consumer confidence.

 

Also am I the only person that is alarmed at the fact that governments here and abroad seem determined to try to solve the problem by throwing money at the problem? If this doesn't work the kitty is empty (well moreso), so wasn't there a case for riding this out then spending money later when the wrost was over???

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"and certainly will out perform a savings account."

 

Perhaps, perhaps not, but in the current climate who wants to take a risk?

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The way I see it it won't be passed on to customers, it merly gives the banks an excuse to cut savings rates thus protecting/increasing thier margins. Case in point Nationwide HAS increased its SVR but this is not available to new customers. What was the old rate and what is the new rate? My understanding is that it has cut its SVR by the same amount as Base rate. The savings rates argument for the bank I work for is nonsense because the savings rates are above base rate on a number of products, Savings Bonds, ISA transfers and Credit Card Accelerator.(all can give interest above base rate).

 

Overdraft, credit card and loan rates remain high. If we accept that bank rates have no link to the BOE base rate won't that have negative consequences for consumer confidence.

Rates on Credit cards, overdrafts are high if you use them, not everyone uses them. Loan rates are normally fixed at the point you take them out.What about LIBOR? You haven't mentioned that.

Also am I the only person that is alarmed at the fact that governments here and abroad seem determined to try to solve the problem by throwing money at the problem? If this doesn't work the kitty is empty (well moreso), so wasn't there a case for riding this out then spending money later when the wrost was over???

 

Not if the worst can be avoided. This is a short term issue which for some people will have long term ramifications. To answer a post further down this list, it is the ideal time to invest. Most investments are for a period of 5 or 6 years. If I was a betting man I would be buying shares NOW or investing NOW because history tells us that the market will recover.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I agree it may be a good time to invest but there again it may not financial advisors have disclaimers saying in effect even though all the advice I gave you is based on the past the past is not a reliable indication of future performance.

 

My main point is if hefty base rate cuts don't have the desired effect this says to the public we can't do anything about this. This is IMO not a good impression to make.

 

Wheres that other poster whos saying I've come to accept if debt is the problem then repayment is the solution, I'd like to see that persons comments...

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...