Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

AA99 v GE Money Car Loan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4610 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My daughter's car loan is with GE Money and we had major problems with them 2007. They issued a default notice which was not valid. Judging by the dating of yours I would say the same thing has happened with you as my daughter.

 

Firstly, a default notice you should be given 14 days. As you say, GE Money always date theirs on a Sunday. So the chances are you probably wouldn't have received it until the Tuesday thereby not giving you 14 days. You need to keep your envelopes with GE Money.

 

I would be inclined to write to GE Money and tell them that the default notice that they have issued is not valid. Also the amount shown should not include charges, so if they have included charges again this is not valid.

 

I dealt with my daughter's case from February 07 to August 07 when I wrote to the Chief Executive and threatened legal action. Within 2 days of this letter being delivered I had a phone call from Head of Complaints. My daughter finished up with £1,500 compensation. He said to me on reading the file he was highly embarrassed and lessons needed to be learnt.

 

Doesn't seem that they have learnt any to me as the dating of default notices was one that I highlighted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 248
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Yes its worked. If you didn't receive this until 3.9.08 and they want it rectified by 14.9.08 then you haven't been given the 14 days statutory notice.

 

Write to them saying thank you for the Default notice dated Sunday, 31st August, received 3.9.08 settlement date 14.9.08. As you are aware this Default Notice is not valid as you have not given me the statutory 14 days notice to rectify the situation. How you deal with this is then up to you. I would certainly be stating that they shouldn't be registering this with any CRA's as you will take legal action if necessary against GE Money and will be seeking compensation. Is the amount correct? This should be shown as the amount you are in arrears and should not show any penalty charges. You also need to point this out to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

When did they post it - they should give 14 days clear notice. As you didn't receive this until 3rd September, they haven't given you the required notice. My daughter had the same with them. I wrote and told them it wasn't valid. Also, are there any charges in this total as again the figure has to be a true one which doesn include any charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All what you have received is what my daughter received. Despite Head of Complaints advising me that they had lessons to learn following my correspondence they obviously havent' learnt them.

 

I would send a letter to Head of Complaints - you could always phone us to see who it is now so that you can address it personally, also copy in the Chief Executive. Explain the position and say that the default notice they have issued is not valid as (a) contains charges (b) doesn't give the requisite 14 days notice. Unfortunately, we were dealing with them from February to September before we got sorted.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Watch 'em. I had 9 of these letters every four weeks got the same letter. Its because they don't know how to deal with the matter, so much for their Head of Complaints saying to me that lessons would be learnt. They obviously don't listen to him either. I think you need to send all your correspondence to the Chief Executive. You will need to ring them and ask who it is and where he is based. HE was in London when I wrote to him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

42MAN - I had Citi sell on a debt whilst complaint was actually with the FOS. When I quoted what you've just said, as I was under the same impression, the FOS emailed me and asked me where I obtained this information from. Basically, they are a waste of space when it comes to anything like agreements and OFT Guidelines. However, the FOS did pursue Citi and Citi had to buy it back from 1st Credit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I would invest a £1.00 and send for a copy of the agreement. You will then see whether GE passed the agreement over when they assigned it. Quite often they don't. Don't forget don't sign the letter. I think you already have a copy but don't worry about that, it is worth seeing what they have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, send a CCA request to Link - if they have got a copy then they are snookered, all the threats in the world won't do them any good. Quite often no paperwork gets handed over, if they can't supply you with a copy and they have to ask GE for it there is no saying they will hand it over. I presently have a case where a DCA has bought a debt with no paperwork and the original creditor have been asked for the agreement and have not handed it over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason I would CCA them you would know exactly what paperwork they have got and it would give you peace of mind if they couldn't come up with the agreement. You would be in a stronger position if they fail to come up with a copy of the agreement within 12 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...