Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Great Universal Handbag Cover & Account Cover


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5834 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

Bit of advice wanted please following conversation with my mum. She was sold Handbag Cover by someone calling from Great Universal on the day she came out of hospital following an eye operation. She doesn't know what the cover is for & said she pleaded with them to stop calling her to sell her things. Anyhow, next statement came through £29.99 charged. When she called to cancel it saying she hadn't signed they said she made a verbal agreement & only had 10 days to cancel.

 

Also, they have recently added account cover back onto her account under a different guise. A few months a go I realised she was paying PPI & told her to cancel which she did. She said they called again to say that they had an account cover that suited her. She would have been paying PPI for over 10 years and she was definately unemployed during some of this period. When she was employed she only works 5 hours per week, I wouldn't have thought she would be covered by PPI for this? Was thinking of clearing the balance in full, closing the acount & then writing to request a refund. Is this the right order to do things? Do I need to get proof she was unemployed? Any help much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres nothing to stop you making a claim whilst money is still owed on the account.

 

What on earth is Handbag cover?? ALso am I right in thinking she cancelled the PPI then they phoned her and sold her the same insurance under a different name soon after? That would be very devious if so!

 

I'm affraid I don't know enough to offer much advise but I'm sure someone wiser will be along soon :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply Sparklez30:)

 

The handbag cover is provided by 08000 HelpMe which must be linked to Great Universal as they charged it to her statement. I spoke to someone to complain that they pressured her & sold her something she doesn't need. They cancel your mobile, credit cards & sort your passport. She has old pay as you go phone, no credit or debit cards & has never been abroad ever! I'm just writing a letter asking them to refund the fee. If they don't I want a copy of the phone transcript as it will be incriminating that they were overly forceful. If they say they don't have it I can suggest they have no proof that she entered the agreement so will threaten the FS Ombudsman.

 

Regarding the PPI they are slippery buggers. I told her to cancel it which she did as she only works 5 hours a week. If you look up the terms of there current policy it says if you don't work 16 hours we will pay one third your monthly bill if you spend 5 nights in hospital! Wow so generous! I'm sure this is how they get round selling it to people who don't work. Con is the premium isn't a fraction of the full price considering they only provide a fraction of cover. Have cleared the balance but not closed the account & am going to send S.A.R.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi Guys,

 

Just a quick update. I think Mum got the £29.95 refunded in to her catalogue account for the Handbag Cover within a week of me sending the letter. I say I think as I haven't seen a statement & the letter seemed a bit confused saying they wouldn't take the premium & they had refunded it!

 

Anyhow, regarding the Great Universal PPI the letter was sent early May. We have received no acknowledgement that they had received the letter & they cashed the £10 cheque 27th May. To date I still have received nothing. Do you think I should kick up a bit of a stink to them that to add insult to injury when querying unjust payments that they have taken £10 & provided me with nothing. Should I remind them that I am within my rights to report them to the Information Commisioner? As regards sending them a Letter Before Action, the amount in dispute is only £50ish. Surely, it will cost more than that to go to the small claims court. Am I not able to write to the Financial Services Ombudsman & ask them to resolve this case?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello apn8keh,

 

Anyhow, regarding the Great Universal PPI the letter was sent early May. We have received no acknowledgement that they had received the letter & they cashed the £10 cheque 27th May. To date I still have received nothing. Do you think I should kick up a bit of a stink to them that to add insult to injury when querying unjust payments that they have taken £10 & provided me with nothing. Should I remind them that I am within my rights to report them to the Information Commisioner? As regards sending them a Letter Before Action, the amount in dispute is only £50ish. Surely, it will cost more than that to go to the small claims court. Am I not able to write to the Financial Services Ombudsman & ask them to resolve this case?

 

They have legally 40 days to supply the data requested under the terms of the SAR, check on the date of your letter or use the date of the Cheque date work out the 40 days and then either submit a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service (Ombudsman) or issue a Letter Before Action and go down the Court route. If you go FOS first and the complaint is upheld then bingo If the complaint is not upheld then you can proceed down the Court route (you cannot do it the other way round) If you go to Court and lose it is most unlikely the FOS would look at your case.

 

 

Hope this helps

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...