Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Capital One PPI charges


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5925 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi....

 

i'm posting this for my mother-in-law....(no funny in-law jokes please...she's actually really nice....!!!!)

 

anyway, she got herself a C 1 credit card about 6 years ago, no problems...then got a letter a while ago asking her if she would like an upgraded card, which she accepted....but they just sent her another card...fine so she kept both, used them paid, paid the card bill each month no problems.....recently she noticed that she was being charged for a PPI on both cards neither which asked for.

she has now asked why this was and was told that she was sold the PPI's by telephone......which she has told me never happen.....problems starting!!!!

so far she has by letter asked for the money back...about £800.... and was told no, the PPI's were sold to her by phone and thats that....!

she has now managed to ask for her statements from day one of her account which she has now got.....

 

i presume we now need to ask for a copy of the original agreement for the cards to make sure PPI was not asked for.....

 

what do we do next.....???

 

i have some experience of claiming charges back myself as i successfully got all my bank charges back last year from nationwide with that help of this fantastic site.....and "milk tray man"......you know who you are..:-)

 

Nick V Nationwide

 

 

regards

 

Nick (busa)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi , i am claiming ppi from cap1 now, at court stage.

what you need to do is to cca them , paying the £1.00 fee, and i would do a full sar data protection request so you can have all the info you need from cap1.

make sure you have a copy of the ppi policy and with the sar request ask for transcripts of the phone calls made .

in the meantime work out the fees paid and use the credit card spread sheets to enter the details. this can be found in the a-z list on the site.

 

good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

cheers oggy..

 

cca what's that then......cant remember?

 

oh...and whats the link to your thread, id like to keep an eye on it to see how your doing.....good luck with it...

 

Nick

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

 

I work for a BBC1 consumer affairs programme called "Don't Get Done, Get Dom", in which presenter Dominic Littlewood attempts to resolve issues that have arisen between consumers and companies.

 

Having read your story, we would be extremely keen to hear from you to see if there is anything we might be able to do to help.

 

If you would like to talk to us, please get in touch at:

 

robertgee@flametv.co.uk

0207 713 6868

 

Thanks very much,

 

Robert Gershinson

Don’t Get Done, Get Dom (BBC1)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

Capital One account taken out in 2000.

 

Im claiming back husbands PPI charges Capital One also said it was agreed over the phone in October 2004. Now my husband is an ex purchasing director from the motor industry and there is no way on this earth he would agree to anything like this over the phone.

 

We have a copy of the CCA and this now turns out to be an application form not an agreement so we have put together two court bundles which was sent to the Court last week.

 

Today we have had a phone call from Capital One offering to refund £50 of the PPI back, but it would have to come of the balance of the account.

 

Needless to say we told them we have two claims in with the court, and basically see you there. The guy then said it will go to there Solicitors then and we will incure charges. Seems odd as we are the one thats taken them to Court.

 

Lynn

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...