Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

ge money !! returning the favour


oggy1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5507 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi to you all,

this will take some sorting out.

i still have the mortgage with ge but what the heck!!

breif outline: they have taken me to court a couple of times, applied loads of charges over the last 20 years, cashed my endownment policy without my signature in 1997.

the balance outstanding is £2000 different to what they want to remortgage and now they have found a " floating " account , which is mine and is in arrears.they cant give me exact details for some reason.

 

any suggestions would be appreciated !!!!!!!!!!:confused: :confused:

 

have sent SAR today by recorded delivery

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am waiting for all the information on this and i have spoken to ge about the policy and they said asit was tied to the mortgage they have the right to cash the policy in without my say so

i think this is going to be interesting.:wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am waiting for all the information on this and i have spoken to ge about the policy and they said asit was tied to the mortgage they have the right to cash the policy in without my say so

i think this is going to be interesting.:wink:

 

I think you might be right, cant wait to hear what they say about it.

Brecken xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
had a reply today to my S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to ge money.

i am amazed !!!

they will supply me statements free of charge if i want a full subject access request and could i let them know ?

im confused , i thought i had asked for that already.:rolleyes:

 

A lot of the SARs say

Alternatively, a full set of statements will be acceptable, or words to that effect.

Maybe they are refering to that.

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi everyone,

had a response today at last, asking if i can confirm by return if i require a full sar and they will supply in the timescales if required.

i must be mistaken , isnt that what the sar required in the first place.?????????????

Link to post
Share on other sites

had a parcel of documents today, very badly packaged, royal mail tried to seal the envelope.

i am disgusted the way they have sent important info out like that.

 

anyway they have been running another account in connection with my mortgage account with approx £1350 owing.

they seem to have started this in 1993/4 and called it a projected balancing account .

i would be gratefull if anybody has ever heard of this before.

they are saying it is money that i owe on top of my mortgage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

sorry for not responding earlier but been really busy on other cases.

i cant remember signing any deed of any description and under the full sar i requested all the documentation relating to this transaction and they just dont respond.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they haven't sent you all documentation as a request of a SAR within the timescale you can report them to the ICO via their website. I would write again to GE Money that they haven't complied within the timescale and that they have left you no alternative but to report this matter to the ICO. The ICO did intervene with one of my cases, Morgan Stanley, for not complying to a SAR. Alternatively, fill in an N1 court claim form.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry for not responding earlier but been really busy on other cases.

i cant remember signing any deed of any description and under the full S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) i requested all the documentation relating to this transaction and they just dont respond.

 

 

OGGY is this a first mortgage with GE or a secured loan with GE (second charge)

 

It would be worth your time filing a complaint with Financial Ombudsman Services (FOS) explain the qwhole thing to FOS and ask them to lok right through the whole matter from beginning to end.

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/consumer/form/mortgage-endowment-questionnaire.doc also read FAQs mortgage endowment complaints

 

GE can't do this and write saying the charges are in the contract they are wrong. You've given them opportunity to respond and put matters right - they are still pulling wool over your eyes - so NOW you go FOS and get the whole thing sorted properly - you'll be surprised at the outcome.

 

Do not remortgage till you have the outcome of an FOS investigation - you will find GE will soon be placing you on their marketing lists to send you flyers encouraging you remortgage at a cheaper rate and they'll phone offering you the same - ignore and decline any such offers till you've had proper answers from FOS. There will be more in your favour to get this investigated completely.

 

Send with your completed complaint form copies of any relevant papers as far back as you can go and a copy of your agreement & statement etc.. try give FOS as full a picure as you can.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

thanks for the advice , as i have some time now i will do as you suggest and report ge finance.

this was a mortgage in its own right with first national , which was part of ge finance.

they then renamed first national to ge , still at the same address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

i have written to ge capital 5 times giving 7 days to respond to the missing documentation and i have not even had an acknowledgement let alone a proper reply.

i am going to issue a court claim under the data protection act.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

issued a claim under the data protection act and recived a letter from ge today to pay the whole amount, no mention of supplying the requested documents though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

have recieved a cheque from ge to prevent court action with an assurance they will supply the requested documents.

 

if i accept the payment and they dont comply can i start court action again for the same thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

hi

back with the mortgage charges, now after many letters they will not refund the charges as they are applied within the terms and conditions.

i have had a copy of the deed of assigment and i did not sign it, they say the mortgage agreement gives them the right to cash in the endowment when it falls into arrears.

 

any ideas would help on my long battle.

thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they will not refund the charges as they are applied within the terms and conditions.
The banks have always said that - still ended up paying up, though

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...