Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Transport police


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5395 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My thoughts are with the poor unfortunate passenger who would have to sit on a seat that had had someone else's feet on it. BUT YOU SIT ON A SEAT THATS HAD SOMEONE ELSES AR$E ON IT

God knows what a person has trodden on beforehand?!...:mad:

 

Zero tolerance is what is needed with the youth of today!

A total disrespect + lack of concern for other people is endemic in modern society.

I believe that the fault firmly lies on the shoulders of the parents.

It is all too easy to blame teachers or the government.

 

In a case like this, it is simply BAD MANNERS. HMM YEAH WHEN HAS BAD MANNERS BEEN A CRIMINAL OFFENCE DESERVING OF THE FULL WEIGHT OF THE LAW BEING USED? .:rolleyes: OH PLEASE

The person involved deserves having the full weight of the law thrown against him, to serve as an deterrent to others...:mad:

 

If not, what would it be the NEXT time??

Grafitti??...Vandalism??...Fare Dodging??...or EVEN WORSE??

Perhaps the shock of a conviction would nip his anti-social activity in the bud, before it escalates further?!

It could actually be beneficial to him in the long term!!...;):)

 

Come on MTM, this isn't very helpful now is it. the fact is yeah the lad had his feet on a chair, but he suffers from arthritis and put his feet up possibly to alleviate the pain he is probably a very nice lad and i dont see any reference to this boy being a persistent pain or repeat offender

 

i dont disagree with you that society has gone soft but there must be proportionality with things, if this guy had mugged an old lady or committed an wanton act of criminal damage then yes the full weight of the law should be used but hey he put his foot up on a chair

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

its still an offence in england to eat a mince pie on Christmas day too there are many absurd laws in england

 

the law should be applied proportionately too so the punishment should fit the crime

 

however, if there is a defence available to this lad he has the right to use it to defend himself

 

there is a principle in English law of the presumption of innocence until proven guilty before a court of law

 

it is my contention that if there is a defence available to this boy he should be entitled to it and therefore i will if possible to do so help him

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pen

 

my sincere appologies for not getting back sooner, when ever i seem to plan something, something comes along and blows my plans out of the water

 

i have to be honest and say i havent even had a chance to fully reread the thread so im gonna have to take a look in the morning now. thats as long as i dont get collared into other things

 

 

regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi pen,

 

the closed hearing will be recorded, very much like a DJ in chambers for small claims cases so there will be a record of all matters stated in the court

 

you need to see if the cheque has been cashed for sure as it will be helpful to know one way or the other.

 

im concerned as to the fact that this hearing on the 15th hasnt been notified by the court. i would certainly suggest contacting the court and checking with them as you have not received any notification of hearing. it may be the case that the form merely has been lost int he post as courts only use 1st class standard post so its in the hands of the postie:eek:

 

i will have a chat with someone who i know should be able to help and i will come back to you

 

the main thing is at this stage to check with the court as to whats going on with regards the 15th

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Paul,

 

Please dont tell me this was actually law. It is so stupid, scuse me while l scoff the mince pies, I have heard of sum allerged laws but this one must have been made buy some who hates mince pies.

 

Chrissi

 

yes it is actually law, it comes from the days of cromwell

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Pen.

 

I am glad the outcome was favourable towards your son.

 

They should now be apologising to you and your son for the problems they have caused let alone faking or attempting to fake a court document.

 

I also have had some laughs reading this thread especailly the stupid laws.

 

Good luck with your other battles.

 

Chrissi

 

yep like it being against the law to eat mince pies on christmas day:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow Dave! Very True! That is exactly the problem now - its all gone too far .....

- last weekend a friend was collecting my Daughter and was having a small natter in my hall the door 1/2 open - when she got out the "parking ambasadors" as we call them in Salisbury (well I actually call them another unprintable name!!) gave my friend a parking ticket that pointed out that she was in a parking permit zone and on a yellow line....well you can park outside our house for up to 2 hrs and as for the yellow line it wore out months ago and there is NO YELLOW LINE! But she paid the fine immediately! she must be MAD! If the markings are not clear, then without going into tooo much detail here, the case of Davis and Heatley in the high court ruled that the markings must be clear, if they are not then there should not be a penalty charge

 

further more if you can produce proof that the lines do not comply with the TSRGD 2002 you may be able to push the council to reimburse you under the ruling in the case of Woolwich equitable building society -V - inland revenue as this case sets out where a fine is paid where there is no basis in law to enforce it then you are entitled to restitution

 

We also got a ticket for parking across our own gates the weekend before it was 0910 on a Saturday morning! At the moment they are patrolling our quiet road all day, every day, and on that Saturday were going at it two at a time one on each side of the road!

Not very long ago they would have knocked on our door and said you had better move - but now they are intent on enforcing the law - or is that collecting the revenue? -

BUT when the yob kids near by kicked a hole in our fence and I took a photo of them , and the shop nearby had a good picture of the kids on their cctv we were told it was not in the public interest to prosecute them!!!!

BUT obviously criminal types like Pens' son really do need to be taught a lesson!;) That is in the public interest as they make £30 out of him/Pen.

It makes me MAD :mad: Keep thinking of moving abroad to try and find life like it was a few years ago when we were a free country.....:(

 

.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...